• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Good, Bad, Ugly - EWU

Didn't look good.

Trainer behind him looked like she was holding him up on the ride off the field.

If he's been concussed once this year wonder if he'll take the rest of the year off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
BillingsMafia said:
AZGrizFan said:
BillingsMafia said:
The Stitt offense is not an effective offense. Even it the dropped balls were caught the out come would have been the same.

The cat game is going to be close and this team is not a lock to beat anyone. We had a great 20 year run but dark days are ahead.

You sound like a cat fan too. Go be one.
I thought you were in time out?

It's over.
My timeout, that is.
 
HookedonGriz said:
Good:
- felt like our D struggled, but it really was just giving up too many critical big plays. Griz hold them to their lowest points and total yards (except for UNI holding them to 34 points) and that included better output than ndsu (who has a great defense).
- getting JLM back. Probably not 100 percent yet but still did his thing. 10 receptions and that grab on the sideline was a thing of beauty.
- Bingham catches everything and blocks very well
- showing some fight when the game was out of reach and getting a couple big picks

Bad:
- key injuries to Calhoun and Horner
- Brady throwing 2 picks....again continues to panic whenever their is pressure
- our O line getting owned again and alllowing too much pressure.
- way too many dropped balls. Wtf was going on with our receivers. They were very costly too as a couple could have been TDs

Ugly:
- that damn field that owns us
- doc3gt and his collies
- another missed PAT
- Stitt continuing to be a stubborn douche nozzle leaving Semenza in to miss PATs in like 6 straight games. Let Purdy kick PATs for fu%#s sake as it couldn't possibly be worse.

Feel free to add. They looked pretty darn good on both sides of the ball for about 10 minutes then went to shit.

Griz should just go for 2 on every TD. They only have to convert 50% to equal 100% on kicks. And we won't have to watch Semenza duck hooking it from the 10 yard line anymore. BTW, he almost missed on the first TD too.
 
Ugly: I can no longer stomach reading through most egriz threads these days. Why?

Ugliest: Some of our fans on egriz.
 
Bad- Stitt punting on 4th down while down 19 points at the 5 min mark. Sure the Griz were deep in their own territory but why punt? You just surrendered the win with that decision.
 
Our kicker is 33 out of 41 at xp's. yikes, that's 80 percent... it's funny how it's okay to admit he's playing poorly on here, but admitting the same thing about qb1 is blasphemy
 
G-BEARS said:
Our kicker is 33 out of 41 at xp's. yikes, that's 80 percent... it's funny how it's okay to admit he's playing poorly on here, but admitting the same thing about qb1 is blasphemy


It isn't blasphemy. It just isn't borne out in the numbers, which makes it an opinion. And when it's an opinion not borne out by the numbers, it's bound to be questioned.
 
EverettGriz said:
G-BEARS said:
Our kicker is 33 out of 41 at xp's. yikes, that's 80 percent... it's funny how it's okay to admit he's playing poorly on here, but admitting the same thing about qb1 is blasphemy


It isn't blasphemy. It just isn't borne out in the numbers, which makes it an opinion. And when it's an opinion not borne out by the numbers, it's bound to be questioned.

Another numbers driven minion, who woulda thunk it.
 
EverettGriz said:
G-BEARS said:
Our kicker is 33 out of 41 at xp's. yikes, that's 80 percent... it's funny how it's okay to admit he's playing poorly on here, but admitting the same thing about qb1 is blasphemy


It isn't blasphemy. It just isn't borne out in the numbers, which makes it an opinion. And when it's an opinion not borne out by the numbers, it's bound to be questioned.
Here are some numbers that bear it out. UM scores 16 against a team allowing an average of 33 per game.
 
G-BEARS said:
Our kicker is 33 out of 41 at xp's. yikes, that's 80 percent... it's funny how it's okay to admit he's playing poorly on here, but admitting the same thing about qb1 is blasphemy

So, you are using the numbers, which show the kicker has missed a ton of extra points, to support saying he has played poorly (at least in kicking points)? Seems fine and supported to me. Who would possibly disagree with the statement that the kicker has missed way to many extra points?

Now let's see you use stats, or anything concrete other than your opinion, to show that BG has been playing poorly. Again, we don't want your opinion. Back up your view with something tangible.
 
PlayerRep said:
Now let's see you use stats, or anything concrete other than your opinion, to show that BG has been playing poorly. Again, we don't want your opinion. Back up your view with something tangible.
It's frustrating to see how well the offense is doing on actually moving the ball, but comparing that to tangible results.

In the two recent games, Our Offense put up 1,081 yards against our opponents' combined offense of 860 yards. But, we scored 50 points, they scored 80.

Our Defense kept our opponents' combined yardage of 860 yards well below their typical game yardages of 920 yards. But, our Defense kept their combined scores to 80 which is exactly their average scores against all of their opponents this season. Like of the Offense, the kids seem to be doing the job on the field, but we can't keep the other guys out of the end zone.

Of course, looked at another way, NAU and EWU were able to score the same number of points against our Defense with 860 yards of play that usually takes them 920 yards to achieve. We made it easy for them.

The average scores of EWU and NAU opponents this season is 57 points per game. We scored 50. We are not the best that those two teams have faced. We are not even average. We are below average. It's not for lack of talent on the field.
 
UMGriz75 said:
PlayerRep said:
Now let's see you use stats, or anything concrete other than your opinion, to show that BG has been playing poorly. Again, we don't want your opinion. Back up your view with something tangible.
It's frustrating to see how well the offense is doing on actually moving the ball, but comparing that to tangible results.

In the two recent games, Our Offense put up 1,081 yards against our opponents' combined offense of 860 yards. But, we scored 50 points, they scored 80.

Our Defense kept our opponents' combined yardage of 860 yards well below their typical game yardages of 920 yards. But, our Defense kept their combined scores to 80 which is exactly their average scores against all of their opponents this season. Like of the Offense, the kids seem to be doing the job on the field, but we can't keep the other guys out of the end zone.

Of course, looked at another way, NAU and EWU were able to score the same number of points against our Defense with 860 yards of play that usually takes them 920 yards to achieve. We made it easy for them.

The average scores of EWU and NAU opponents this season is 57 points per game. We scored 50. We are not the best that those two teams have faced. We are not even average. We are below average. It's not for lack of talent on the field.

Yeah, have to agree here. Watched multiple Ewu games. NO CO, UC DAVIS, MSU all were able to perform at a higher level against them. MT was not able to execute. The game plan was there ( wide open receivers etc) but the execution was way off (dropped passes, blown coverage etc)

Difference was those teams capitalized on the opportunity when presented where UM was unable to do so.
 
And I am all for that kind of statistical and other analysis. I have also said in the past that I am not sold on the offense, at least yet, in part because it seems to lead to too much inconsistency and seems prone to mistake. I have also said that the defense is also prone to mistakes that can lead to big plays for the opposing team. Baldwin also said this after the game and was quoted on it. My views were only impressions and based on watching games and looking at results from afar. Don't know if my impressions are correct or would be borne out by stats.
 
Throw the stats out the window. The highest ranked team we have beat is uni at 29th.

St Francis....50
Suu............33
Sac St.........98
Miss. Valley...125
Uni.............29

We should have big numbers. The positive going forward is msu is 74. Northern Co is 30. Isu..76
With Northern Colorado on the road it will be close. Choate is preparing for UM as we speak. The 4 year seniors on that team haven't beat the Griz and I'm sure Newell and Brekke would love nothing more than to beat us (I highly doubt they can).
The stats show everything but the truth......the truth is Stitt better get these kids ready to play 60 minutes of football for three games or we may end with a train wreck.
 
Good offense was able to start fast and control time of possession initially and first score.
Bad allowing EWU's best WR to get behind DBs. 15 yard PI looks pretty good compared to long pass completions.
Ugly DBs being beat for big plays and TDs, long plays killed UM player moral. Defense not prepared for quick snaps. Injuries. Not getting the 50/50 balls in air or fumbles. First half score after controlling the ball well.

Congratulations to EWU their players executed very well, hats off to Baldwin for a well coached game.

Hope the DBs can work out some of the coverage issues or take a PI when beat instead of big chunk plays.

Not complaining about the player more the officials, looked like JC got hit in earhole with the crown of the helmet, with injury timeout isn't targeting able to be called by replay or does it have to be called on the field or is it not targeting because RB is a runner and defensive player has right to hit helmet to helmet with the crown of the helmet or was it not helmet to helmet. Did not have problem with how EWU defensive players played thought officials dropped the ball.

Griz are now cornered with their backs against the wall, we will see how they respond. Go Griz!
 
Diesel said:
Good offense was able to start fast and control time of possession initially and first score.
Bad allowing EWU's best WR to get behind DBs. 15 yard PI looks pretty good compared to long pass completions.
Ugly DBs being beat for big plays and TDs, long plays killed UM player moral. Defense not prepared for quick snaps. Injuries. Not getting the 50/50 balls in air or fumbles. First half score after controlling the ball well.

Congratulations to EWU their players executed very well, hats off to Baldwin for a well coached game.

Hope the DBs can work out some of the coverage issues or take a PI when beat instead of big chunk plays.

Not complaining about the player more the officials, looked like JC got hit in earhole with the crown of the helmet, with injury timeout isn't targeting able to be called by replay or does it have to be called on the field or is it not targeting because RB is a runner and defensive player has right to hit helmet to helmet with the crown of the helmet or was it not helmet to helmet. Did not have problem with how EWU defensive players played thought officials dropped the ball.

Griz are now cornered with their backs against the wall, we will see how they respond. Go Griz!

SRX_EWUMONT_011_TT_t1140.jpg
Grizzlies running back Jeremy Calhoun (8) is brought down by EWU during a college football game on Saturday, Oct 29, 2016, at Roos Field in Cheney, Wash. (Tyler Tjomsland / The Spokesman-Review
 
PGM the hit to helmet was the initial contact before being driven into the turf. Good picture of facemask penalty that didn't get called. Helmet being pulled down over his eyes. I'm not saying it was a dirty play or officials caused Griz to lose, just saying they had a long time to look at play that caused injury. Question of replay being able to call a targeting on play if it isn't called on the field, maybe targeting has to be called on field then automatic review or not reviewable w/o call on field.
 
mtgrizrule said:
Ugly: I can no longer stomach reading through most egriz threads these days. Why?

Ugliest: Some of our fans on egriz.

Oh come on dude. Is it really anything that new? Seriously, what were you expecting??

And have you ever visited other fan boards where a historically very successful program is struggling? Makes this board look tame. Check out the Golden Domers' fan sites sometime after a tough loss for a good definition of apoplectic. It's really quite funny :cry:
 
Back
Top