i have to disagree with a few things here. first, st mary's is a decent team. they finish second every year to only gonzaga. they beat them in their gym last year, and were close to pulling it out at gonzaga this year. you can say the ref should have swallowed his whistle, and let the game go into overtime, but that is bs. st. mary played the same out-of-bounds defense the last two possesions, and one was a layup, and the other was a foul. the last thing i said before the pass was dont let them have a layup. and what did they do? and there was actually two different gonzaga players that could have scored on that play. how 'bout instead of the ref swallowing his whistle, maybe smu could have not been morons three times in a row, and played the inbound! just because a guy makes a huge mistake with a tick on the clock doesn't mean the ref pretends not to see it. the same goes for when a team is down three and bombs a half courter. just because it is the end of the game, doesn't mean if the defender is stupid, and fouls the shooter, you dont call it. and this scenario seems to happen a few times every season. teams only have to play good ball for 39:57, and then expect the refs to do, or not to do, the rest. dude got fouled in the end, made 1-2, zags win. and for the record, i hate gonzaga, and coach few ever since i coached his camp a few summers ago and he was a cock, and the camp was awful. so there is no bias here, just clear thinking!
First of all SMU is a terrible team. Last year they were decent but lost four starters to and are clearly worse than isn past years. As foir the end of the game that wasn't a foul and I really hope you werent implying that there second option was kicking the ball to altador-cespades for a three. That guy couldnt throw the ball in the spokanbe River from the divsion st bridge. I would hardly say SMU expected the refs to hand them the game but I am assuming they were expecting a fairly called game. A foul that was clearly on Morrison assigned to Knight, slapping th eball and barking at the refs all game showing them up, and that foul call at the end along w/ the clock mysteriously not starting. Homer job is the perfect description. I suppose I would agree w/ the post saying they should be ranked 10 simply b/c if they werent in the top 10 all we would hear about is how they should be. They will most likely get a two seed in the tourney and I see no reason why a 14 or 15 seed cxant beat these guys. I know they wont get past the second round though and until they do I am refusing to give them there desired respect. QUIT CRYING ABOUT YOUR SEED AND DO SOMETHING AND QUIT LOSING TO TEAMS LIKE WYOMING, TEXAS TECH, AND NEVADA