PlayerRep said:argh! said:kemajic said:Strahm was overrated, did not have Olson's speed and was totally exposed by a weak MSU team. Even Vika was ahead of Olson on the depth chart. There is plenty of evidence; do you want to compare Vika to Olson today? Olson was the best LB in UM history as soon as he took the field as a junior, so he could not compete as a soph? I played the position and watch the position every game. What is it that makes you so expert, other than your defensive bias for Stitt/Semore?argh! said:in 2017 stitt had banks, buss, and strahm as starting linebackers. is olsen better than them now? sure. was he as a sophomore? i'm not so sure. until buss got hurt, he was said to be nfl-bound. banks had tons of tackles. strahm, while i personally didn't like some of his antics, was also considered quite good. so stop with the bs about 'stitt not realizing what he had'. you don't have enough evidence for that, because you'd have to compare the sophomore olsen to those others, who were pretty darn good.
gawd you are a clown. i'm just giving some possible reasons why others played over olsen. if you remember, there were a lot of guys given the boot by stitt, but olsen obviously wasn't. what is true is that a lot of teams passed on him out of high school, so i guess that automatically means all those other coaches were idiots, as per your logic. what were his measurables in 2017? did he gain weight/strength later? i don't know. do you? also, are you saying buss, banks, and strahm were bad? greenie frequently defended strahm, maybe ask him?
I have never dissed Stitt for not starting Olson ahead of those 3 backers. All 3 were very good.
yes, i know you didn't, and that you previously commented that the three were very good. every now and again you show that you know a bit about the game, as it is currently played. my comment was aimed at kem.