sdk.catfish
Well-known member
grizghost
..sorry I must have miss it? ...did catfish ask me a question
Actually I didn't but I will now? Did you cash your $1200 socialist (whoops "stimulus") check?
:lol:
grizghost
..sorry I must have miss it? ...did catfish ask me a question
sdk.catfish said:grizghost
..sorry I must have miss it? ...did catfish ask me a question
Actually I didn't but I will now? Did you cash your $1200 socialist (whoops "stimulus") check?
:lol:
What? A green new deal would be exactly that, a social component within capitalism. Just like the new deal was, just like the wall street bailout of 2008 and the recent bailout. The only difference is the green new deal has better priorities for working people. Got it kids?kemajic said:Having social components within capitalism is not unusual and certainly does not constitute socialism. The Green New Deal would.sdk.catfish said:FROM KEM
Ok Kem, here is one definition of socialism "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."
So if you are saying that Government reimbursing UM for playing no football because that would be the death blow for UM football isn't using taxpayer dollars for "regulating the economy for the community as a whole", then just what would it be? Please provide your (documented) definition of socialism. By the way do you collect social security, use medicare, drive on government maintained roads, depend on government provided law enforcement, etc? All socialism - and it aint so bad.
indian-outlaw said:What? A green new deal would be exactly that, a social component within capitalism. Just like the new deal was, just like the wall street bailout of 2008 and the recent bailout. The only difference is the green new deal has better priorities for working people. Got it kids?kemajic said:Having social components within capitalism is not unusual and certainly does not constitute socialism. The Green New Deal would.
Education is different in Portland.PlayerRep said:indian-outlaw said:What? A green new deal would be exactly that, a social component within capitalism. Just like the new deal was, just like the wall street bailout of 2008 and the recent bailout. The only difference is the green new deal has better priorities for working people. Got it kids?
Nope. Green New Deal has nothing to do with capitalism. Please get some education before you say dumb stuff like that again.
indian-outlaw said:What? A green new deal would be exactly that, a social component within capitalism. Just like the new deal was, just like the wall street bailout of 2008 and the recent bailout. The only difference is the green new deal has better priorities for working people. Got it kids?kemajic said:Having social components within capitalism is not unusual and certainly does not constitute socialism. The Green New Deal would.
Brother Bear said:"The worst-case scenario from a budget standpoint is if we had a fall where we played football but couldn't have any fans in the stadium," said Martin. "So you have all the expenses associated with football, the travel, the cost to bring teams in here in non-conference games, but still have those expenses but not have any revenue to make up." According to Martin, if the Griz went that route they would be staring at a $6.5-7 million loss in revenue. Not only would that majorly affect the football program but other athletic programs at UM, as well.
https://www.montanasports.com/sports/big-sky-conference/montana-grizzlies/altered-or-canceled-football-season-would-have-ripple-effect-on-montana-griz-athletics
What is at stake for the city of Missoula? According to a study by the Bureau of Business and Economic Research at Montana that was conducted in 2016, Griz football alone is responsible for bringing in an estimated $2.53 million worth of spending from out-of-area attendees per each home game. With inflation rates over the past few years, it's possible that number has gone up slightly, and Montana is scheduled to have six home games in the 2020 season.
https://www.montanasports.com/sports/big-sky-conference/montana-grizzlies/if-montana-griz-football-is-canceled-heres-whats-at-stake-for-missoulas-economy
2016 Study can be found here:
http://www.bber.umt.edu/pubs/econ/UMAthleticImpact2016.pdf
------------------------
Sportico's Coffey gets insights from Wall Street on how the near-term trajectory of college athletics is being received in the municipal bond market. Straight to the point from one unnamed trader, "Bonds used for athletic improvements will fall apart if there’s a second wave of COVID-19 and no TV or attendance revenue from college sports." FitchRatings Senior Director Lewis: "There is the incentive on the university side to step in. The university either recognizes or doesn’t recognize the sports program is instrumental to their livelihood." DPC Data executive & longtime trader Nguyen: "The irony is they’re used to being highly rated credits—the larger schools with the larger football programs. This changes the game. My sense is we’ll probably see some downgrades."
https://www.sportico.com/2020/business/finance/debt-laden-college-football-programs-making-muni-market-nervous-1234608360/
Dumb stuff like that? Geezus dude, do you really think you have any room to talk?PlayerRep said:indian-outlaw said:What? A green new deal would be exactly that, a social component within capitalism. Just like the new deal was, just like the wall street bailout of 2008 and the recent bailout. The only difference is the green new deal has better priorities for working people. Got it kids?
Nope. Green New Deal has nothing to do with capitalism. Please get some education before you say dumb stuff like that again.
Keep telling yourself that the 5 trillion dollars that was given to the multi nationalists wasn't socialism. The GND will at least put a few working people on the job.AZGrizFan said:indian-outlaw said:What? A green new deal would be exactly that, a social component within capitalism. Just like the new deal was, just like the wall street bailout of 2008 and the recent bailout. The only difference is the green new deal has better priorities for working people. Got it kids?
Is that the new spin they’re telling you to put on the GND? To attempt to make it palatable? :roll: :lol:
don’t worry folks, it’s just a “social component” WITHIN capitalism!
indian-outlaw said:Dumb stuff like that? Geezus dude, do you really think you have any room to talk?PlayerRep said:Nope. Green New Deal has nothing to do with capitalism. Please get some education before you say dumb stuff like that again.
indian-outlaw said:Keep telling yourself that the 5 trillion dollars that was given to the multi nationalists wasn't socialism. The GND will at least put a few working people on the job.AZGrizFan said:Is that the new spin they’re telling you to put on the GND? To attempt to make it palatable? :roll: :lol:
don’t worry folks, it’s just a “social component” WITHIN capitalism!
PlayerRep said:indian-outlaw said:Keep telling yourself that the 5 trillion dollars that was given to the multi nationalists wasn't socialism. The GND will at least put a few working people on the job.
Again, smart guy, lay it out for all of us. Explain the 5 trillion dollars as socialism.
indian-outlaw said:PlayerRep said:Again, smart guy, lay it out for all of us. Explain the 5 trillion dollars as socialism.
You're hilarious.
If you can't understand how printing and handing over 5 trillion dollars to multinational corporations by the federal reserve is a form of socializing the losses of business I cannot help you. I think you need a remedial HS class on government. For a lawyer you sure are stupid.PlayerRep said:indian-outlaw said:You're hilarious.
Where's your explanation?
I know you don't have any. No substance. Don't know what you're talking about.
You've always been an occasionally big mouth, with no substance.
indian-outlaw said:If you can't understand how printing and handing over 5 trillion dollars to multinational corporations by the federal reserve is a form of socializing the losses of business I cannot help you. I think you need a remedial HS class on government. For a lawyer you sure are stupid.PlayerRep said:Where's your explanation?
I know you don't have any. No substance. Don't know what you're talking about.
You've always been an occasionally big mouth, with no substance.
PlayerRep said:indian-outlaw said:If you can't understand how printing and handing over 5 trillion dollars to multinational corporations by the federal reserve is a form of socializing the losses of business I cannot help you. I think you need a remedial HS class on government. For a lawyer you sure are stupid.
If you can't explain it, that probably means that you don't know what you're talking about.
What 5 trillion was printed and handed over?
I majored in government.
argh! said:PlayerRep said:If you can't explain it, that probably means that you don't know what you're talking about.
What 5 trillion was printed and handed over?
I majored in government.
this guy majored in government at dartmouth, too. hmmm. might explain some things?
https://dartmouthalumnimagazine.com/blake-neff-tucker-carlson
Well dude, while you were busy dropping names and bragging about yourself at some party of jock sniffing donors your government ponied up $4.5 trillion in tax payer money that they didn't have. Which means the federal reserve just printed it. I rounded up to $5 trillion because the week prior they had handed over $500 million in emergency funding. This is not to mention the trillions in quantitative easing that has been going on for years. So we can very conservatively say that it was $5 trillion. It was actually probably twice that or more.PlayerRep said:indian-outlaw said:If you can't understand how printing and handing over 5 trillion dollars to multinational corporations by the federal reserve is a form of socializing the losses of business I cannot help you. I think you need a remedial HS class on government. For a lawyer you sure are stupid.
If you can't explain it, that probably means that you don't know what you're talking about.
What 5 trillion was printed and handed over?
I majored in government.