PlayerRep said:
ALPHAGRIZ1 said:
Tokyogriz said:
To get an accurate assesment of population vs crime rates you should use the missoula metropolian area which is around 100,000. The reason for this is large chunks of the city aren't officially in the city but the people in effect do live in missoula. I would also point out most people in the missoula metro area work, shop, and conduct a majority of their affairs in the city limits of missoula.
OK, I will play along, using your false 100k numbers we are still 2.5 times the national average.
But hey your the guy that likes to watch rapes happen then defend the guy doing it. You are good at your job, should have been another scumbag defense attorney...........
"Missoula Police Chief Mark Muir acknowledged his department had received roughly 80 rape reports in the past three years. But he said that on a per-capita basis, that figure was at or below the average level of reported rapes for U.S. college towns of similar size and makeup."
"Our review to date involved interviews with numerous people, and a review of documents and other information.
Our primary focus is not the number of reported allegations of sexual assault; rather, our focus is on the response."
This has nothing to do with rapes per capita, or even rapes per year. It's about covering them up. You know, that magical rug that UM has been sweeping EVERYTHING under for the past 10 -12 years? It's threadbare, and so are your tired-ass cliches. You are either being a willful idiot, or a literal idiot. Either way, you're a straight-up clown that cannot be taken seriously.