kemajic said:
CDAGRIZ said:
NorthEndZoneDan said:
how many seats are being added for the 25 million?
It looks like that number is 12. Or, a little over $2 million per seat.
Current 8,600:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roos_Field
Proposal shows 8,612.
Or, is this another problem with the mock-up? If not, given how we constantly hear how they sell out all the time, this project will pay off by about 2084 based on additional ticket sales alone.
Current is either 8600 or 8700 (above link). The money goes into removing the track, replacing inadequate seating and press boxes and creating premium boxes. The turf replacement number is high because it would appear they move the field toward the current good side to tighten it up once the track is gone. They have in the past used temporary seating to increase capacity by about 2000 for big games, like Montana. I presume that will be an ongoing option. Big improvement in functionality, but a high price tag for a small revenue increase.
Yeah, they have to consider (a) how many more people will buy tickets to "non-big" games if this is implemented, (b) the increased cost of this plan over bringing in temp seats for all games if the demand is there, and (c) if the temp seating is ever a deterrent to attendance for any game.
I'd venture:
(a) speculative at best, given that they only bring in temps for big games.
(b) Extremely higher cost without knowing if demand is there.
(c) No.
I might keep the track for a dual-purpose facility, spend some money on a gigantic video/scoreboard, offer 10k tickets per home game, and keep a temp seating contractor on retainer to be able to throw them up in a day or two if need be.