no but a win would've looked incredible.info said:..don't look too bad now do they!! :dance:
info said:..don't look too bad now do they!! :dance:
info said:..don't look too bad now do they!! :dance:
'68griz said:Turd, I couldn't agree with you more. A loss is a loss is a loss. That's exactly why I oppose the FB team playing the likes of Iowa and Oregon -- how can it be a good thing to go in to a guaranteed loss??
copper&gold said:if losing to Va tech and WVU are 'good' are the losses to EWU and Sac st. extremely bad losses? If the griz win the BSC tourney and you were on the commitee what you think about the griz? now the debate becomes play-in game or 16 seed
GK19 said:AtHome wrote,
We're probably not making it out of the first round anyway.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Griz get the #2 seed they automatically get out of the first round. -> insert hooray fingers emoticon.
GrizFan10 said:So under the loss-is-a-loss theory, the UM women's 40 point loss to Ohio St. is the same as a 1 point loss? Do you think the ncaa selection/seeding committee will treat the 40 point loss the same as a 1 point loss?
'68griz said:Turd, I couldn't agree with you more. A loss is a loss is a loss. That's exactly why I oppose the FB team playing the likes of Iowa and Oregon -- how can it be a good thing to go in to a guaranteed loss??