Swillbury
Well-known member
IndyGriz said:CDAGRIZ said:Since you were wondering umdeez, I took the liberty to find those useless stats:
ZAGS vs. ACC
Gonzaga’s record against teams from the Atlantic Coast Conference is 8-1:
1995: lost to No. 10 Maryland (NCAA Tournament)
1997: beat No. 5 Clemson (Top of the World, Fairbanks)
2001: beat No. 15 Virginia (NCAA Tournament)
2002: beat No. 18 North Carolina St. (Continental Arena, NJ)
2003: beat No. 25 Maryland (MCI Center, DC)
2004: beat No. 3 Georgia Tech (Thomas & Mack, Vegas)
2005: beat No. 23 Maryland (Maui Classic)
2005: beat Virginia (McCarthey Center)
2006: beat No. 2 UNC (Madison Square Garden)
Yeah, you are right, they would have no chance at being anything but a middle of the pack team in the ACC....
Dude, don't assume, get your facts straight before you go off making wild assertions. I think anybody who looks at the above would agree that one can make a stronger case for GU being a contenter in the ACC than he/she could for them being a middle of the pack team.
Any more brain busters?
Its the Wednesday vs Wake Forest, Friday vs Duke and Saturday vs UNC that makes a conference like the ACC tough. Playing a first round game or an early season game sandwiched between Eastern Washington and Idaho is not the same thing.
The Zags would compete but they would be no better than Georgia Tech, Wake Forest or Virginia.
He makes an excellent point. There is a huge difference between 9 ACC games in last 11 years or 15 ACC games in a season. And when you add in the OCC that most of those teams play, it makes for a rough entire season. Gonzaga plays a legit team every say 4 games in their OCC and usually win or keep it close but then the rest of the games are gimmies. Then after that, they get to coast through the WCC. Its just not the same and I refuse to claim them as any more as a mid-major on steriods.
They would be a good team in the Valley and an average team in the Big East/ACC/Big XII/Pac-10
:twocents: