• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Does The Stitt Offense Handicap UM Football? b

Status
Not open for further replies.
bgbigdog said:
BadlandsGrizFan said:
zirge said:
AZGrizFan said:
Not only that, but he sure as shit isn't going to abandon something that's gotten him this far, especially in a year he's "on the hot seat" and try and implement a completely different scheme at the 11th hour...like or not, we're gonna be seeing a lot of what we saw (play wise) last year...

Yikes!......plus if it takes 4-5 years for the qb to learn and run the system with any efficientcy, according to one, you think the summer was a long wait and see, buckle up.

I know many on here will not agree...but I think the system is not the problem...I believe the QB running the system was the problem.

We all see how it can work when the QB is doing his job....we beat the 5 time champs when it happens.

I think the five-time champ had something to do with losing that game & used it for motivation in round 2 @ the end of that season. And props to Gustafson for leading them back.

It's likely they're going to have to get past whatever caused the collapses of last season, before anything gets significantly better. Without pointing fingers, something I constantly want to do, someone recognized that it's important to be "united" when they take the field, thus a spelled-out point in the new corporate buzzwords for this season. If you haven't already watched it, look @ Colt's speech to the team before the spring game. He puts what it means to "represent" about as well as anyone could have. Get back to that, and you may have something.

I would like Bob to utilize a little different philosophy this season on offense. How about improvise, adapt & overcome. It works. All he needs to do is watch the tape of the UUNI game from last season.

Good post Bigdog!

Bob Stitt has drank more beer, banged more qwiff and pissed more blood than all you sons of bitchs combined.
 
horribilisfan8184 said:
I think most of the posters on here are missing the boat on the issues facing Coach Stitt and the team. It's not his X's and O's, it's the intangibles and aspects of human nature he underestimated.

When he came here, he left a program where he was head coach for 15 years. The first year he had his recruits (year 5) they went 12-1. There was no one left from the prior coach's recruits. There was no one left who didn't buy into Stitt's system, no one with loyalties to prior coaches, no one who felt entitled to a starting position once they won it. He comes to Montana and has to accept as his DC someone he beat our for the job, someone who was the players' first choice for the HC position. This was a bigger hurdle to team unity and performance than any opposing team.

Stitt's first mistake was agreeing to keep Ty. Ty's players were loyal to him, and backed him against Stitt. "Mature" 21 and 22 year-olds were acting like teenage step sons who wouldn't mind their step dad. Is it any mystery why tranfers, Jones, Hendo and Roberts were our three best players? Sure they had talent, but they also knew how to be mature and work with changes in coaches and philosophies and all bought in. Many of the players who didn't were cleaned out, but not until after the first year.

Montana is the state flagship university. CSM, not so much. Home state boys are the darlings of the fans, the media, the boosters, and this board. Look at the 37 jersey hoopla. I'm surprised the ACLU hasn't stepped in to stop that. Point is this is a seed for dissension, not unity, and I don't think Stitt anticipated this. But he did notice something about a "me first" attitude, and responded by taking names off the backs of jerseys. Think it was Stitt's recruits who bristled at this? I'd deal with this by making 73 a special jersey for the out-of-state kids, and raise that flag each game as well.

Stitt'ss now on his third year and it's evident he and the team have learned from these prior issues. The film of practice drills and the scrimmages show greater camaraderie and effort than I remember his first 2 years. I know parents of several players who report that Stitt's recruits are now becoming leaders in the locker room and on the field. They are excited about the leadership qualities of all the current QB's. None of them want or will tolerate the type of let down that happened last year. My experience with these players is they tell boosters and sycophants what they think they want to hear, and tell their parents the actual story. I share none of the pessimism of crowd on here wanting to run Stitt out on a rail.

Stitt has a very keen football mind. He didn't get stupid by leaving CSM. I think he underestimated the forces of resistance he was going to face, and his ability to get the square pegs he inherited at the QB into a system requiring round pegs. I think Semore will learn to adapt his defenses and adjustments much better now that he's seen BSC offenses for two years and had to make those calls by himself.

I think we will see less slow starts this year, and we will put a few teams away by half or mid 3rd qtr. And I'm going to take the Griz and the points against Washington. Stitt has won this team over. I believe he and this years' team will win the fans over as well with their performances. The football will still bounce in funny ways, and if a few more bounce the team's way, look out.

Great post!!! Nice to read something on here that makes one think!
 
sdk.catfish said:
You morons keep bringing up the James Madison program. Are you willfully ignorant or truly clueless? I can't tell. I'm 50/50 on Stitt, but he inherited Grandpa Delaney's recruits. James Madison coach inherited a Big 10 offensive and defensive line, and an NFL running back. Are those like comparisons?

Again, you fail to address the question of whether this is just a recruit thing or if there are more complex things such as being able to bring 60 plus young men together to build the foundation of a football dynasty. I haven't brought this up before but if Haslam had wanted a D2 coach with proven success at winning national championships he needed to go no further than 125 miles east to Helena where Mike VanDiest has won five. But no, he apparently wanted the hyped, and a lot of it self-hyped, glamour of offensive genius Bob Stitt. Time to put up or shut up. Either the offensive genius, with his own recruits, makes us proud or dies on his own sword. But I'm just not one who considers the cost benefit of giving a coach 5 years outweighs past performance which includes no national championships and a mediocre seasonal/playoff record.
A completely reasonable opinion, cat, my issue is the use of a piss poor example in James Madison. They had serious national championship talent. It's not useful to your point for people to keep bringing them up. They're the very definition of an outlier. They were clearly more talented than every team in the FCS.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top