JayLarson said:Jim O'Day was there too.
+1NorthEndZoneDan said:This +GrizSpartan said:He is the kid's coach. He was there for support. A good teacher/coach takes interest in the important times in their student's lives. The coach is being a coach...a good one.
No need to criticize. He is a man of honor.
This must be it, according to Pat Williams the courtrooms are loaded with talent.Ursus1 said:I think two reasons.....supporting a kid he feels is getting railroaded (train picture?) And....recruiting trip hoping to keep him if not guilty verdict
GrizSpartan said:He is the kid's coach. He was there for support. A good teacher/coach takes interest in the important times in their student's lives. The coach is being a coach...a good one.
No need to criticize. He is a man of honor.
Do they still call these types, "Groupies"?1976griz said:Florio's latest article states that Jim O'Day's son is the guy "Jane Doe" went to pick up the night of the incident. I can see why Jim O'Day is attending! His son is on the witness list according to the article.
That visual is pitch perfect!spsyk said:Ursa Major said:I'm betting he got lost and thought he was in line at the post office.
Can anybody update, if Coach Delaney had his headphone on or not.
If on is he getting any better at keeping them on his head.
Jaredkuehn said:This must be it, according to Pat Williams the courtrooms are loaded with talent.Ursus1 said:I think two reasons.....supporting a kid he feels is getting railroaded (train picture?) And....recruiting trip hoping to keep him if not guilty verdict
Ursa Major said:I'm betting he got lost and thought he was in line at the post office.
Sportin' Life said:So what was he there for? I understand there is a strong vent for voyeurism that many in Missoula couldn't resist, but what was his reason for attending? Surely he knew that his presence for the accuser's testimony would be talked about.
Alaska Griz said:Two things. he can and should support J.J. in this matter unless he doen't want to. Secondly, somebody said it's okay to show support to J.J. until he proven guilty, basically. Ultimately, the jury will hand down a verdict, very likely there will be no definitive proof of anything that cannot be argued or debated in its degree and intent. Finally, Mick can support J.J. regardless of the verdict, even if not openly to the media. If my friendships with others hinged on them "f*ucking up" then what a shallow pact I have entered into in the first place. I have friends who are, as far as I know, squeaky clean, and other friends who have made major mistakes. If you don't have both and you're over, say 18, then a rock you've lived under. Leave it to the internet, casting ultimatums on two stranger's (J.J. and Delaney) relationship.
stubbins said:Alaska Griz said:Two things. he can and should support J.J. in this matter unless he doen't want to. Secondly, somebody said it's okay to show support to J.J. until he proven guilty, basically. Ultimately, the jury will hand down a verdict, very likely there will be no definitive proof of anything that cannot be argued or debated in its degree and intent. Finally, Mick can support J.J. regardless of the verdict, even if not openly to the media. If my friendships with others hinged on them "f*ucking up" then what a shallow pact I have entered into in the first place. I have friends who are, as far as I know, squeaky clean, and other friends who have made major mistakes. If you don't have both and you're over, say 18, then a rock you've lived under. Leave it to the internet, casting ultimatums on two stranger's (J.J. and Delaney) relationship.
exactly correct...too bad that consideration wasn't given to the previous coach...