gotgame75 said:
Wow... early candidate for non-story of the year. Redshirt that never played a down leaves the team?!
And 75, the way you are beating the drum for some sort of thinly-veiled coaching conspiracy Is every bit is as out of line as people commenting on Daum's supposed "lack of effort" or other broad-based assumptions. You are obviously way too personally invested in some of these players to be objective. Player loss of ilk we are seeing is right in line with what you see at every program during the first year or two after a coaching regime change. Heard literally some of the EXACT same commentary after the transition from Glenn to Hauck. It's a fact of life. Some kids adjust, some don't. Same can be said for the transition from high school to college, as in Daum's case.
"Player loss of ilk." ??? Seriously?
Two problems with your fabricated scenario:
1) proven players are leaving,
2) Daum was one of Stitt's own, highly touted, recruits.
You seem to miss the latter point, although I am sure that it not an accident. This has nothing to do with the change of Staff. Daum was not recruited by previous staff.
Or do you have a "thinly veiled coaching conspiracy" about that too?
Perhaps you are too personally invested in the coaching staff to be objective.
See how that works?
The problem here is that even among now-graduated players who had a successful transition under Stitt, the "Little Napolean" complex wore thin. For those of us who do believe that players are at a disadvantage to $300,000 a year coaches, players need to be believed when the same comments, repeated over and over, reach a critical mass and in particular when the unhappiness is coming from even his own recruits.