• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Current US World Cup Game

Sorry, but he's from Norway 🇳🇴, so by drafting rules, Da Vikings probably select him in the first round : ) !!!

My Swedish relatives tell me that a Norske is just a really, really dumb Swede : ( !!! I'm pretty sure the Norwegians have the same border joke but with some role reversal 🤔 ?
How did the swede die drinking milk?

Cow sat down.
 
4 - 1, just like the USAs first game, only in reverse order.
"
“It is as real, as real can be,” said the Fairy Godmother. “But there is one thing you must know.”

“What is that?”

“All of this lasts only to midnight. Tonight, at the stroke of midnight, it will all be over. Everything will go back to how it was before."
 
As long as club soccer is more about club profit than the actual kids, US soccer will suffer.
Bingo. And as long as youth soccer organizers and coaches insist kids play soccer year round and continue to interfere with all other youth sports in various seasons, it will continue to suffer. Soccer people (at least around here) are the craziest and most controlling of the kids, demanding so much of their time. Therefore, the best athletes that love other sports get burned out and end up quitting soccer.

Soccer is also the worst at elitist attitude, as they demand the worst and further travel for the youth travel squads... has to the be the most expensive travel sport, hearing local teams that constantly are traveling to boise, Seattle salt lake, Phoenix, san diego ect ect.

Let the kids play multiple sports, dont exclude kids whose families maybe cant afford the extensive travel, and perhaps you'd find your retention of the best athletes gets better.
 
Bingo. And as long as youth soccer organizers and coaches insist kids play soccer year round and continue to interfere with all other youth sports in various seasons, it will continue to suffer. Soccer people (at least around here) are the craziest and most controlling of the kids, demanding so much of their time. Therefore, the best athletes that love other sports get burned out and end up quitting soccer.

Soccer is also the worst at elitist attitude, as they demand the worst and further travel for the youth travel squads... has to the be the most expensive travel sport, hearing local teams that constantly are traveling to boise, Seattle salt lake, Phoenix, san diego ect ect.

Let the kids play multiple sports, dont exclude kids whose families maybe cant afford the extensive travel, and perhaps you'd find your retention of the best athletes gets better.
someone else said something to the effect that the european youth model was better for developing talent than what happens in the u.s., but the kids in their system wind up training for soccer year-round, with little time for other sports. i'd rather see kids have the option to try various sports, even those they might not excel at playing. that's one thing the u.s. high school sports systems provide, and i think it's a big strength.
 
someone else said something to the effect that the european youth model was better for developing talent than what happens in the u.s., but the kids in their system wind up training for soccer year-round, with little time for other sports. i'd rather see kids have the option to try various sports, even those they might not excel at playing. that's one thing the u.s. high school sports systems provide, and i think it's a big strength.
The big thing about the European model is the youth clubs are rewarded by sell-on features in contracts. The youth clubs will get a percentage of professional contracts for each player they develop. This top down approach for pretty much every country but the US, allows youth clubs to be free and in some instances provide assistance and not price kids out. It places the onus on the club to produce players as opposed the parent dues to support the clubs.
 
FIFA needs to upgrade the quality of its officiating. The Balogun call was an absolute joke, IMHO. But, then again its probably due to my ignorance of soccer rules. There was another red card thrown last night against a English team player. Same thing, playing the ball and contact. A travesty.
I would say similar but not the same. England player was going for a hard tackle and likely a yellow card. But poor luck his leg hit the ball and his already relatively high studs were a bit higher. He had intent just based on his actions, so probably deserved. Would've probably just been a yellow if not for the rebound off the ball.
 
The big thing about the European model is the youth clubs are rewarded by sell-on features in contracts. The youth clubs will get a percentage of professional contracts for each player they develop. This top down approach for pretty much every country but the US, allows youth clubs to be free and in some instances provide assistance and not price kids out. It places the onus on the club to produce players as opposed the parent dues to support the clubs.
As a parent of a club soccer daughter (or 2 now), I think the system really needs to be more like this. What is interesting to me is that Brazil was always superior to most other countries. But the last 20 ish years, what made Brazil "better" has been wiped away. Their culture is so rooted in soccer, that they play all the time. They all develop superior skills and 1 v 1 attributes. The all out attack and break your opponent down philosophy is really no longer...all because the superior players are now sent to academy...and their instinctual play is changed to fit the current "way the game is played." There is no real spontaneity of previous Brazil teams.
 
The big thing about the European model is the youth clubs are rewarded by sell-on features in contracts. The youth clubs will get a percentage of professional contracts for each player they develop. This top down approach for pretty much every country but the US, allows youth clubs to be free and in some instances provide assistance and not price kids out. It places the onus on the club to produce players as opposed the parent dues to support the clubs.
that model works great, if all you care about is developing soccer players good enough to go pro and help fund your team. that's not the goal (no pun intended) of high school sports in the america. the u.s. high school system is more egalitarian, and gives kids the opportunity to try different sports, although sometimes there is a relatively small fee to help offest some of the school's costs. according to our friend gemni, kids in missoula might need to spend about $500 to play football, including cleats, etc... conversely, and again with gemni to blame, a teenage kid playing for a club in england pays at least $2000 per year.

i am going to have to side with the u.s. on this one.
 
As a parent of a club soccer daughter (or 2 now), I think the system really needs to be more like this. What is interesting to me is that Brazil was always superior to most other countries. But the last 20 ish years, what made Brazil "better" has been wiped away. Their culture is so rooted in soccer, that they play all the time. They all develop superior skills and 1 v 1 attributes. The all out attack and break your opponent down philosophy is really no longer...all because the superior players are now sent to academy...and their instinctual play is changed to fit the current "way the game is played." There is no real spontaneity of previous Brazil teams.
I think I heard somewhere (maybe on the Landon Donovan and Tim Howard podcast) that the Euro model also has their "best" or "most experienced" coaches coach the lower levels. Feels the opposite here - seems lower levels are mostly coached by new or "volunteer" coaches.
 
Back
Top