• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Current US World Cup Game

FIFA needs to upgrade the quality of its officiating. The Balogun call was an absolute joke, IMHO. But, then again its probably due to my ignorance of soccer rules. There was another red card thrown last night against a English team player. Same thing, playing the ball and contact. A travesty.
 
FIFA needs to upgrade the quality of its officiating. The Balogun call was an absolute joke, IMHO. But, then again its probably due to my ignorance of soccer rules. There was another red card thrown last night against a English team player. Same thing, playing the ball and contact. A travesty.
The two situations you mention were not the same. In the Balogun situation, the man came from behind, they made contact, and in the normal stepping motion Balogun came down into his calf. The second situation was during intentional motion, he came in "studs up" which is considered dangerous act/reckless challenge. In this situation, your "ball and contact" is irrelevant.
 
The two situations you mention were not the same. In the Balogun situation, the man came from behind, they made contact, and in the normal stepping motion Balogun came down into his calf. The second situation was during intentional motion, he came in "studs up" which is considered dangerous act/reckless challenge. In this situation, your "ball and contact" is irrelevant.
The contact was more Balogun stepping on the top partof ankle, not really the calf. Small point.
 
The problem is not just that Balogun got sent off. The problem is that it never should have been eligible for a Video Assistant Referee, or VAR, review in the first place.

The referee was right there, saw the play live, and did not view it as a foul worthy of a red card. Balogun and the defender were both making a play on the ball, and the contact came from a normal collision as both arrived in the same space. There was no studs up lunge, no excessive force, no reckless intent, and no clear attempt to go through the player.

VAR is supposed to step in only when the referee made a clear and obvious error. This was not that. At most, it was a debatable accidental coming together. Once VAR sends the referee to the monitor and shows slow motion contact from the worst possible angle, it turns a routine football collision into something that looks far more violent than it was in real time.

That is why the real mistake was the VAR intervention itself. It should never have gone to the monitor, which means a red card should never have even been on the table.
 
Back
Top