UMGriz75
Well-known member
Because the post I was responding to said this:grizindabox said:UMGriz75 said:This thread's a good example. I was addressing, factually, the contention that "all" schools evaluate scholarships annually. He wasn't in the conversation. Then he butts in, tries to say I said something I didn't say, lies about the postings, and creates yet another artificial dispute. Just blatant lies.Fushiznitz said:How about you two take your 'pitching vs. catching' debate elsewhere? I hate having to log in to avoid reading your pissing match in every thread. If you could, that would be great. Mkay? Or not. Whatever. Carry on.
He does it on thread after thread. As I pointed out, this thread is a typical example. I wasn't talking to him about anything, but he can't "let go" of an embarrassment weeks ago, and apparently is a compulsive liar to boot. Here he is again. Same story.
He apparently feels the need. I don't, but when someone is as willing to lie and distort conversations as he is ... it's a colossal waste of time, for everybody, I agree. He doesn't agree. He feels the need ....
This is the last one....
UMGriz75 said:As I "attempted" to point out on another thread, this is wrong, and currently among one of the most volatile controversies in college sports. Several schools do now offer four year scholarships; precisely to out-recruit schools that recruit and then cut promising athletes because of coaching "changes" that have nothing to do with the competitor's abilities. The kids want protection from that.
The Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC), Big Ten Conference (B1G), Big 12 Conference, Pacific-12 Conference (Pac-12), and Southeastern Conference (SEC), all now offer four year schollies. "Between 2002-2011, 99.3% of the top 100 football recruits in the nation chose teams in the power conferences. Historically, over 90% of football teams that finish in the top 25 rankings and over 90% of the basketball teams that make it to the Final Four are from the power conferences."
where exactly in this post...the one I commented on....does any of this info relate directly to Montana, the BSC, or an equivalent conference.....because that was my question.....you are throwing out the Big 5 conferences as your reasoning why what Montana is doing is wrong....but you are comparing apples to oranges..
See how I responded to what he actually said, and kept it directly on point?bgbigdog wrote:
Or how programs are run and scholarships doled out. Every school evaluates scholarship athletes every season. Nothing is guaranteed to anyone.
See how hard that was?
And used actual facts instead of needing to lie about what the poster actually posted?
And you turned it into another two page diatribe of what I "meant" or what I "really said," etc etc. because you always need to strike down what someone didn't say, because you are incompetent to deal with what they actually did say.
Tell you what, simply don't respond to my posts that have nothing to do with you, and everyone will obviously be much happier at not have to read your distended crap.