• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Cats lose out?

The main reason why I bumped this thread was because BIGsky33 wanted someone to quote him the the Griz wouldn't get the W and the cats would win on the smoldering garbage pile south of Spocompton.
 
AZGrizFan said:
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
Baldwin took his foot off the gas vs. the Griz.

He learned his lesson.

After the Eagles scored to go up 42-17 here's how the game went:

Griz: Pass, pass, run punt
EWU: Run, run, pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass, pass, run, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)
EWU: Run, pass (VA scrambled), pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass (JJ scrambled), pass (TD)
EWU: Pass, pass, pass, run, pass (INT)
Griz: Pass, pass, pass, missed FG
EWU: pass, pass, run, pass, sack, punt
Griz: pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)

I count 4 running plays and 11 passing plays...that's a HIGHER ratio than during the first three quarters, since for the game EWU attempted 48 passes and rushed 28 times.

Spin it how you want...I do find it comical though, that the same Beagles fans who come on here and INSIST that they figured out SHSU's offense last year and that's why they almost came back and beat them in the playoffs come on here and INSIST that the only reason the Griz almost came back was because "Baldwin took his foot off the gas".

Can't have it both ways, fellas. :roll:
Has little to do with run vs pass, but the plays being called. Especially on defense (prevent). Baldwin has essentially stated that he coached not to lose rather than continue what we had been doing all game.
That boldness was born two weeks ago in Missoula, when the Eagles nearly blew a 25-point fourth-quarter lead, partly because of conservative play-calling. “I was mad at myself because of the way I coached at Montana,” Baldwin said.
“It ends up being an attitude that we’re going to go for it,” Baldwin said.
http://www.spokesman.com/eagles/stories/2013/nov/09/eagles-beat-montana-state/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:coffee:
 
And yet, the okay calling wasn't conservative as AZ clearly points out....


I'm beginning to think Baldwin makes as many excuses as Screamin. Just man up and admit you we're getting your ass kicked and were fortunate to hang onto the W.
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
AZGrizFan said:
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
Baldwin took his foot off the gas vs. the Griz.

He learned his lesson.

After the Eagles scored to go up 42-17 here's how the game went:

Griz: Pass, pass, run punt
EWU: Run, run, pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass, pass, run, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)
EWU: Run, pass (VA scrambled), pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass (JJ scrambled), pass (TD)
EWU: Pass, pass, pass, run, pass (INT)
Griz: Pass, pass, pass, missed FG
EWU: pass, pass, run, pass, sack, punt
Griz: pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)

I count 4 running plays and 11 passing plays...that's a HIGHER ratio than during the first three quarters, since for the game EWU attempted 48 passes and rushed 28 times.

Spin it how you want...I do find it comical though, that the same Beagles fans who come on here and INSIST that they figured out SHSU's offense last year and that's why they almost came back and beat them in the playoffs come on here and INSIST that the only reason the Griz almost came back was because "Baldwin took his foot off the gas".

Can't have it both ways, fellas. :roll:
Has little to do with run vs pass, but the plays being called. Especially on defense (prevent). Baldwin has essentially stated that he coached not to lose rather than continue what we had been doing all game.
That boldness was born two weeks ago in Missoula, when the Eagles nearly blew a 25-point fourth-quarter lead, partly because of conservative play-calling. “I was mad at myself because of the way I coached at Montana,” Baldwin said.
“It ends up being an attitude that we’re going to go for it,” Baldwin said.
http://www.spokesman.com/eagles/stories/2013/nov/09/eagles-beat-montana-state/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:coffee:

Well that ends it....Baldwin said it. Eagles would've won by 56 points had they let up...

Someone ought to let him know he sounds stooooopid...
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
AZGrizFan said:
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
Baldwin took his foot off the gas vs. the Griz.

He learned his lesson.

After the Eagles scored to go up 42-17 here's how the game went:

Griz: Pass, pass, run punt
EWU: Run, run, pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass, pass, run, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)
EWU: Run, pass (VA scrambled), pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass (JJ scrambled), pass (TD)
EWU: Pass, pass, pass, run, pass (INT)
Griz: Pass, pass, pass, missed FG
EWU: pass, pass, run, pass, sack, punt
Griz: pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)

I count 4 running plays and 11 passing plays...that's a HIGHER ratio than during the first three quarters, since for the game EWU attempted 48 passes and rushed 28 times.

Spin it how you want...I do find it comical though, that the same Beagles fans who come on here and INSIST that they figured out SHSU's offense last year and that's why they almost came back and beat them in the playoffs come on here and INSIST that the only reason the Griz almost came back was because "Baldwin took his foot off the gas".

Can't have it both ways, fellas. :roll:
Has little to do with run vs pass, but the plays being called. Especially on defense (prevent). Baldwin has essentially stated that he coached not to lose rather than continue what we had been doing all game.
That boldness was born two weeks ago in Missoula, when the Eagles nearly blew a 25-point fourth-quarter lead, partly because of conservative play-calling. “I was mad at myself because of the way I coached at Montana,” Baldwin said.
“It ends up being an attitude that we’re going to go for it,” Baldwin said.
http://www.spokesman.com/eagles/stories/2013/nov/09/eagles-beat-montana-state/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:coffee:
Blah blah blah. Face it. They were gettin their asses kicked. Lucky for you Oiland stuck his hand up about 4" to high.
 
AZGrizFan said:
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
Baldwin took his foot off the gas vs. the Griz.

He learned his lesson.

After the Eagles scored to go up 42-17 here's how the game went:

Griz: Pass, pass, run punt
EWU: Run, run, pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass, pass, run, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)
EWU: Run, pass (VA scrambled), pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass (JJ scrambled), pass (TD)
EWU: Pass, pass, pass, run, pass (INT)
Griz: Pass, pass, pass, missed FG
EWU: pass, pass, run, pass, sack, punt
Griz: pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)

I count 4 running plays and 11 passing plays...that's a HIGHER ratio than during the first three quarters, since for the game EWU attempted 48 passes and rushed 28 times.

Spin it how you want...I do find it comical though, that the same Beagles fans who come on here and INSIST that they figured out SHSU's offense last year and that's why they almost came back and beat them in the playoffs come on here and INSIST that the only reason the Griz almost came back was because "Baldwin took his foot off the gas".

Can't have it both ways, fellas. :roll:

And yet, both games resulted in an L, and outside of that any "what ifs" as to the outcome of those games is just pure conjecture. I do think that the EWU-SHSU game was a little different. EWU was down 35-Zip at the half, Adams comes in, throws 6 2nd half TD's, and our D holds them to only one offensive TD, but that was enough to do it - Adams simply ran out of time. The Eastern/Montana game was pretty even up until the 3rd quarter, and then UM scored a bunch of points in the 4th when it was probably too late for a serious chance to win the game.

I don't know if Baldwin took his foot off the pedal or what, versus UM. Initially I think that was the case, but then went back to the pass. I do think there was some apathy in the 4th quarter, but that is my opinion. Credit UM in adjusting their game plan to exploit some mis-matches that were evident late in the game when we were forced to play a walk-on true Freshman at Safety. It's not the only reason UM had success, but I am saying there were several reasons UM kept it relatively close and not just as simple "UM figured EWU out".


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
EverettGriz said:
And yet, the okay calling wasn't conservative as AZ clearly points out....


I'm beginning to think Baldwin makes as many excuses as Screamin. Just man up and admit you we're getting your ass kicked and were fortunate to hang onto the W.

We were getting our asses kicked and were fortunate to win the game. Same with last year with the onside kick and late score. I guess you could say the same about 2010 while we're at it.

You could make the same case for EWU in 2004 (Blocked FG), 2007 (Bagley catch on 4th down), and 2009 (Very questionable penalties against EWU). Throw 2011 in there, too, had Mitchell not thrown that pick on the 1 YL, or the one late in the game that we would have gone up on had we scored.

It doesn't really matter. The fact remains that this match-up is almost always a close game in recent years. At the end if the day, a close L is still a L.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
EWURanger29 said:
EverettGriz said:
And yet, the okay calling wasn't conservative as AZ clearly points out....


I'm beginning to think Baldwin makes as many excuses as Screamin. Just man up and admit you we're getting your ass kicked and were fortunate to hang onto the W.

We were getting our asses kicked and were fortunate to win the game. Same with last year with the onside kick and late score. I guess you could say the same about 2010 while we're at it.

You could make the same case for EWU in 2004 (Blocked FG), 2007 (Bagley catch on 4th down), and 2009 (Very questionable penalties against EWU). Throw 2011 in there, too, had Mitchell not thrown that pick on the 1 YL, or the one late in the game that we would have gone up on had we scored.

It doesn't really matter. The fact remains that this match-up is almost always a close game in recent years. At the end if the day, a close L is still a L.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Which is exactly what I said above. You and I are in complete agreement. It's just one or two other eag fans who evidently are not intelligent enough to understand it.
 
stubbins said:
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
AZGrizFan said:
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
Baldwin took his foot off the gas vs. the Griz.

He learned his lesson.

After the Eagles scored to go up 42-17 here's how the game went:

Griz: Pass, pass, run punt
EWU: Run, run, pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass, pass, run, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)
EWU: Run, pass (VA scrambled), pass, punt
Griz: Run, pass (JJ scrambled), pass (TD)
EWU: Pass, pass, pass, run, pass (INT)
Griz: Pass, pass, pass, missed FG
EWU: pass, pass, run, pass, sack, punt
Griz: pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass, pass (TD)

I count 4 running plays and 11 passing plays...that's a HIGHER ratio than during the first three quarters, since for the game EWU attempted 48 passes and rushed 28 times.

Spin it how you want...I do find it comical though, that the same Beagles fans who come on here and INSIST that they figured out SHSU's offense last year and that's why they almost came back and beat them in the playoffs come on here and INSIST that the only reason the Griz almost came back was because "Baldwin took his foot off the gas".

Can't have it both ways, fellas. :roll:
Has little to do with run vs pass, but the plays being called. Especially on defense (prevent). Baldwin has essentially stated that he coached not to lose rather than continue what we had been doing all game.
That boldness was born two weeks ago in Missoula, when the Eagles nearly blew a 25-point fourth-quarter lead, partly because of conservative play-calling. “I was mad at myself because of the way I coached at Montana,” Baldwin said.
“It ends up being an attitude that we’re going to go for it,” Baldwin said.
http://www.spokesman.com/eagles/stories/2013/nov/09/eagles-beat-montana-state/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:coffee:

Well that ends it....Baldwin said it. Eagles would've won by 56 points had they let up...

Someone ought to let him know he sounds stooooopid...
Yeah, I'm sure you would know better than the coach calling the plays on whether or not he went conservative. :roll:
 
EverettGriz said:
And yet, the okay calling wasn't conservative as AZ clearly points out....


I'm beginning to think Baldwin makes as many excuses as Screamin. Just man up and admit you we're getting your ass kicked and were fortunate to hang onto the W.
The prevent defense and short check down passes WERE conservative. Just man up and admit the Griz were getting rolled and were fortunate we called off the dogs.
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
EverettGriz said:
And yet, the okay calling wasn't conservative as AZ clearly points out....


I'm beginning to think Baldwin makes as many excuses as Screamin. Just man up and admit you we're getting your ass kicked and were fortunate to hang onto the W.
The prevent defense and short check down passes WERE conservative. Just man up and admit the Griz were getting rolled and were fortunate we called off the dogs.
Riiiggghhhhttt..... So conservative that nothing changed after the start of the 3rd quarter. The Griz came out swinging and had the upper hand. What "good" team allows 25 points and being threatened to lose keeps the play calling conservative? Go away. You're not fooling anyone over here. You're the only one that is believing all this :dead:
 
And now on a Griz site derailing a MSU thread...mods do we really have to have every single thread destroyed by this guy? Getting a little old.
 
I should be banned for stating facts that some of you don't want to hear?

"I was mad at myself at Montana. I didn’t like how I coached in the fourth quarter, and I vowed that I wouldn’t do it again,” EWU head coach Beau Baldwin said. “We didn’t do it at Idaho State, and we didn’t do that today. We still looked at the clock late and burned some time, but I was not going to change my play calling. I wanted to learn from Montana. It is just an attitude. It ends up being an attitude for our guys that we are going to keep the pedal to the metal.”
http://bobcatnation.com/node/614" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
Let's use SE logic, the only reason EWU won in missoula is because UM coaches managed the game for 3 quarters before putting their foot on the gas pedal in the 4th.
 
Just ignore him folks. If we take care of business the next couple of weeks we'll most likely get another shot at them, and I have a feeling it will turn out differently.
 
grizfnz said:
Let's use SE logic, the only reason EWU won in missoula is because UM coaches managed the game for 3 quarters before putting their foot on the gas pedal in the 4th.
That would contradict logic... why would you play conservative when trailing big? Clearly Baldwin didn't think the Griz could come back from 25 down while salting the game away, and he was almost wrong. Credit the Griz for taking advantage and not giving up, but to think that EWU's play calling wasn't conservative in the 4th quarter is to bury your head in the sand.
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
grizfnz said:
Let's use SE logic, the only reason EWU won in missoula is because UM coaches managed the game for 3 quarters before putting their foot on the gas pedal in the 4th.
That would contradict logic... why would you play conservative when trailing big? Clearly Baldwin didn't think the Griz could come back from 25 down while salting the game away, and he was almost wrong. Credit the Griz for taking advantage and not giving up, but to think that EWU's play calling wasn't conservative in the 4th quarter is to bury your head in the sand.

And you don't think SHSU went conservative after 35 unanswered to start the game? :roll:
 
Back
Top