• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

BURNED EARLY

spsyk said:
ordigger said:
Sandry and Sanders expected to play this week..."hopefully". People still don't understand our secondary was not at full strength, plus our starting defensive leader at LB suspended. Thats a lot of talent that was missing.


Lame excuse, playing a team with 0 scholarship's

A team with 0 scholarships beat Cal Poly in the playoffs last year. They don't have athletic scholarships, but don't be fooled. They get good football talent with academic scholarships.
 
fanofzoo said:
grizatwork said:
If you read what he said, it makes sense. We were in press all last year. Our secondary was taught to jump the routes, because we were sending everyone. The problem was teams went max protect and it gave receivers time to make double moves and we were beat a lot. We were in cover 3 zone and he was saying that the secondary reverted to old thinking of challenging first move instead of bailing. If you have the deep third, then no one should get behind you. It was execution of a new them for many first time starters. Time will tell if they learned from it.

And fall camp was for what....

Of course, what was I thinking. 3 first time starters in the secondary should never make a mistake the first game with nerves and excitement and trying to make a play. We should come out of fall camp in playoff form.

Don't get me wrong. I didn't like getting beat deep that often on Saturday either. I just think you need to realize these are young men learning on the fly and trying their hardest. Give them a chance to get better. They will.
 
The easiest part of 3-deep zone is getting back, and having the discipline to get back, to cover the deepest receiver (in your zone or adjacent zone). This is the first responsibility of 3-deep; it's designed to take away the deep ball. This part of 3-deep zone is about as hard as showing up on time to play the game. Other parts of zone are harder, like being able to make the right decisions to cover the deep seams and receivers coming from adjacent zones, or to get good at reacting at the right time to come up to cover the shorter routes (without goofing up and letting a receiver get open deep).

I don't know what the communication problems were. I suppose they could have involved changing the coverage to a 3 deep or something like that. If the defender doesn't know or realize that he's supposed to be in 3 deep coverage, then obviously that's a huge problem.

Generally, in zone coverage, the defenders line up a bit deeper or creep back at the snap, and then start to back pedal immediately. If a receiver starts to approach the defender (who is still back pedaling), then the defender needs to turn and run deeper several steps before the receiver gets to the defender. It isn't hard to do this physically; it's harder mentally, at least for some. I never found it hard mentally either, as I knew my first responsibility was to get deep--not jump a shorter route or support against the run.
 
spsyk said:
ordigger said:
Sandry and Sanders expected to play this week..."hopefully". People still don't understand our secondary was not at full strength, plus our starting defensive leader at LB suspended. Thats a lot of talent that was missing.


Lame excuse, playing a team with 0 scholarship's

Stupid comment. Not all great players need or have scholarships. You do understand that not only the Pioneer, but Ivy League schools also do not offer athletic scholarships. And there are some pretty damn good Ivy League schools. And the Pioneer is an upcoming league. USD beat CalPoly last year....in the playoffs.
 
PlayerRep said:
The easiest part of 3-deep zone is getting back, and having the discipline to get back, to cover the deepest receiver (in your zone or adjacent zone). This is the first responsibility of 3-deep; it's designed to take away the deep ball. This part of 3-deep zone is about as hard as showing up on time to play the game. Other parts of zone are harder, like being able to make the right decisions to cover the deep seams and receivers coming from adjacent zones, or to get good at reacting at the right time to come up to cover the shorter routes (without goofing up and letting a receiver get open deep).

I don't know what the communication problems were. I suppose they could have involved changing the coverage to a 3 deep or something like that. If the defender doesn't know or realize that he's supposed to be in 3 deep coverage, then obviously that's a huge problem.

Generally, in zone coverage, the defenders line up a bit deeper or creep back at the snap, and then start to back pedal immediately. If a receiver starts to approach the defender (who is still back pedaling), then the defender needs to turn and run deeper several steps before the receiver gets to the defender. It isn't hard to do this physically; it's harder mentally, at least for some. I never found it hard mentally either, as I knew my first responsibility was to get deep--not jump a shorter route or support against the run.



this is well stated....the difficulty in a three deep zone usually comes from deep post routes as to when to pass off the receiver....having said that, p.r. is correct, one should never get beat over the top.
 
Ringneck said:
So, from what I understand about the Cover 3 (which is, admittedly, very little), it is a reasonably effective defense as long as the defensive line gets pressure and the secondary remains disciplined in its assignments. Looking back to last week, we witnessed the defensive line get very little pressure and an inexperienced secondary lack discipline in its coverage. So it makes sense that our Cover 3 was exposed by a few big plays.

I think half of this equation - the secondary - is pretty easily rectified with the return of Strong, Sandry, and Strahm. Our pass coverage will get better as the year goes on. The other half of the equation - pressure from the DL - actually concerns me more. I can't really see any reason why we didn't manhandle Valpo in the trenches, especially considering this was thought to be an area of team strength. If we don't get better up front, opposing teams' QBs will have lots of time to air it out against us.

Big time failure on Semore's part. Line wasn't getting effective pressure and the secondary wasn't doing their job......why keep in a cover 3 when doing so is going to exploit those two facets of the game that were playing themselves out right in front of everyone????
 
krammer said:
PlayerRep said:
The easiest part of 3-deep zone is getting back, and having the discipline to get back, to cover the deepest receiver (in your zone or adjacent zone). This is the first responsibility of 3-deep; it's designed to take away the deep ball. This part of 3-deep zone is about as hard as showing up on time to play the game. Other parts of zone are harder, like being able to make the right decisions to cover the deep seams and receivers coming from adjacent zones, or to get good at reacting at the right time to come up to cover the shorter routes (without goofing up and letting a receiver get open deep).

I don't know what the communication problems were. I suppose they could have involved changing the coverage to a 3 deep or something like that. If the defender doesn't know or realize that he's supposed to be in 3 deep coverage, then obviously that's a huge problem.

Generally, in zone coverage, the defenders line up a bit deeper or creep back at the snap, and then start to back pedal immediately. If a receiver starts to approach the defender (who is still back pedaling), then the defender needs to turn and run deeper several steps before the receiver gets to the defender. It isn't hard to do this physically; it's harder mentally, at least for some. I never found it hard mentally either, as I knew my first responsibility was to get deep--not jump a shorter route or support against the run.



this is well stated....the difficulty in a three deep zone usually comes from deep post routes as to when to pass off the receiver....having said that, p.r. is correct, one should never get beat over the top.

Exactly why I said high school kids can do this....thr fact that college players can't stay between goal line and the player in 3 is inexcusable. Their has to be a reason....either coached that can't get calls in on time, players that don't listen to coaches or think they are above doing their job and want to be heroes. Team game, play like a team....and coaches get the communication in on time
 
grizatwork said:
spsyk said:
ordigger said:
Sandry and Sanders expected to play this week..."hopefully". People still don't understand our secondary was not at full strength, plus our starting defensive leader at LB suspended. Thats a lot of talent that was missing.


Lame excuse, playing a team with 0 scholarship's

A team with 0 scholarships beat Cal Poly in the playoffs last year. They don't have athletic scholarships, but don't be fooled. They get good football talent with academic scholarships.

Nope. Not possible. Can't happen. Liar.
 
PlayerRep said:
The easiest part of 3-deep zone is getting back, and having the discipline to get back, to cover the deepest receiver (in your zone or adjacent zone). This is the first responsibility of 3-deep; it's designed to take away the deep ball. This part of 3-deep zone is about as hard as showing up on time to play the game. Other parts of zone are harder, like being able to make the right decisions to cover the deep seams and receivers coming from adjacent zones, or to get good at reacting at the right time to come up to cover the shorter routes (without goofing up and letting a receiver get open deep).

I don't know what the communication problems were. I suppose they could have involved changing the coverage to a 3 deep or something like that. If the defender doesn't know or realize that he's supposed to be in 3 deep coverage, then obviously that's a huge problem.

Generally, in zone coverage, the defenders line up a bit deeper or creep back at the snap, and then start to back pedal immediately. If a receiver starts to approach the defender (who is still back pedaling), then the defender needs to turn and run deeper several steps before the receiver gets to the defender. It isn't hard to do this physically; it's harder mentally, at least for some. I never found it hard mentally either, as I knew my first responsibility was to get deep--not jump a shorter route or support against the run.

Like the Valpo's safety jumping the outside receiver route leaving the inside receiver unguarded for the easy Griz TD in 2nd quarter. Should they fire their DC over that blown coverage by a starter?
 
ordigger said:
spsyk said:
ordigger said:
Sandry and Sanders expected to play this week..."hopefully". People still don't understand our secondary was not at full strength, plus our starting defensive leader at LB suspended. Thats a lot of talent that was missing.


Lame excuse, playing a team with 0 scholarship's

Stupid comment. Not all great players need or have scholarships. You do understand that not only the Pioneer, but Ivy League schools also do not offer athletic scholarships. And there are some pretty damn good Ivy League schools. And the Pioneer is an upcoming league. USD beat CalPoly last year....in the playoffs.

We'll help me to understand, we have fifty plus athletes that are give scholarships for their athletic prowess, and they should not be a step above the academic scholarships given to non scholarship schools

Then to use your term, isn't it stupid for a university to offer athletic scholarships, because with just academic scholarship and walk on's should be able to compete with parity.
 
spsyk said:
ordigger said:
spsyk said:
ordigger said:
Sandry and Sanders expected to play this week..."hopefully". People still don't understand our secondary was not at full strength, plus our starting defensive leader at LB suspended. Thats a lot of talent that was missing.


Lame excuse, playing a team with 0 scholarship's

Stupid comment. Not all great players need or have scholarships. You do understand that not only the Pioneer, but Ivy League schools also do not offer athletic scholarships. And there are some pretty damn good Ivy League schools. And the Pioneer is an upcoming league. USD beat CalPoly last year....in the playoffs.

We'll help me to understand, we have fifty plus athletes that are give scholarships for their athletic prowess, and they should not be a step above the academic scholarships given to non scholarship schools

Then to use your term, isn't it stupid for a university to offer athletic scholarships, because with just academic scholarship and walk on's should be able to compete with parity.

96% of Valpo students get financial assistance and the first year average is $32K+ .
https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/valparaiso-university/paying-for-college/financial-aid/

Looks like non-scholarship students compete for academic financial aid on the same basis as all other students. (eg Drake.):

According to Drake’s online cost calculator, a student with a 3.0 GPA and a score of 24 on the ACT will receive an estimated $10,000 scholarship. That’s enough to negate almost a fourth of Drake’s total annual cost of $43,292.

“I had good grades in high school and that definitely helped once I applied and got a scholarship here academically,” Rice said. “Without it, I don’t know if it would be possible to be here.”

Rice had to find other ways to pay for college, too. He worked during the offseason, either quitting his job or taking time off once spring practice arrived. This fall was the first time he worked during the season. He was only enrolled in one class, so working 12-17 hours a week at Business Solver in West Des Moines while in season was doable.

“I still feel extremely busy all the time,” Rice said.

The Presidential Scholarship wasn’t enough for Dismond, so he applied to the Crew Scholars program, a program for students of color that awards scholarships and grants that cover at least 50 percent of a student’s tuition. From the purely numerical aspect, the Crew scholarship equals a partial-ride football scholarship at another school.

“I had to go through the application just like the same as everyone else,” Dismond said. “I wasn’t guaranteed anything. Once I got that, that helped a lot. That’s probably a big reason why I’m here today.”

http://timesdelphic.com/2015/12/17/no-scholarships-no-problem
 
reinell30 said:
spsyk said:
reinell30 said:
Coach says, "they are going to learn from the deep passes." Well hell, it happened starting at NAU last year and is still continuing. How long does it take to correct this?

15 years

Damn I hope not!

Well we're going on 24 now. Ask Blaine McEllmurry about a certain deep ball against Delaware in '93. I'd bet he can still see it. Course '95 probably helped erase the pain of the memory a bit.
 
Hawkeyebowhunter said:
Ringneck said:
So, from what I understand about the Cover 3 (which is, admittedly, very little), it is a reasonably effective defense as long as the defensive line gets pressure and the secondary remains disciplined in its assignments. Looking back to last week, we witnessed the defensive line get very little pressure and an inexperienced secondary lack discipline in its coverage. So it makes sense that our Cover 3 was exposed by a few big plays.

I think half of this equation - the secondary - is pretty easily rectified with the return of Strong, Sandry, and Strahm. Our pass coverage will get better as the year goes on. The other half of the equation - pressure from the DL - actually concerns me more. I can't really see any reason why we didn't manhandle Valpo in the trenches, especially considering this was thought to be an area of team strength. If we don't get better up front, opposing teams' QBs will have lots of time to air it out against us.

Big time failure on Semore's part. Line wasn't getting effective pressure and the secondary wasn't doing their job......why keep in a cover 3 when doing so is going to exploit those two facets of the game that were playing themselves out right in front of everyone????

Right, thank you for the important clarifying word. I know the D-Line spent some time in the backfield, but it seemed to have little impact on the passing game.
 
spsyk said:
ordigger said:
spsyk said:
ordigger said:
Sandry and Sanders expected to play this week..."hopefully". People still don't understand our secondary was not at full strength, plus our starting defensive leader at LB suspended. Thats a lot of talent that was missing.


Lame excuse, playing a team with 0 scholarship's

Stupid comment. Not all great players need or have scholarships. You do understand that not only the Pioneer, but Ivy League schools also do not offer athletic scholarships. And there are some pretty damn good Ivy League schools. And the Pioneer is an upcoming league. USD beat CalPoly last year....in the playoffs.

We'll help me to understand, we have fifty plus athletes that are give scholarships for their athletic prowess, and they should not be a step above the academic scholarships given to non scholarship schools

Then to use your term, isn't it stupid for a university to offer athletic scholarships, because with just academic scholarship and walk on's should be able to compete with parity.

Well some kids are rich...and don't need scholarships at all. Just because someone gets an athletic scholarship doesn't means they are head and shoulders above one that does. Who knows would motivates kids to go play for certain schools.

However if I got an athletic scholarship to say Western Michigan, and an academic one to Harvard - I'm pretty certain that is a pretty dang easy choice to make, which I would pick.
 
AZGrizFan said:
Ringneck said:
So, from what I understand about the Cover 3 (which is, admittedly, very little), it is a reasonably effective defense as long as the defensive line gets pressure and the secondary remains disciplined in its assignments. Looking back to last week, we witnessed the defensive line get very little pressure and an inexperienced secondary lack discipline in its coverage. So it makes sense that our Cover 3 was exposed by a few big plays.

I think half of this equation - the secondary - is pretty easily rectified with the return of Strong, Sandry, and Strahm. Our pass coverage will get better as the year goes on. The other half of the equation - pressure from the DL - actually concerns me more. I can't really see any reason why we didn't manhandle Valpo in the trenches, especially considering this was thought to be an area of team strength. If we don't get better up front, opposing teams' QBs will have lots of time to air it out against us.

Go watch the game again. Your 2nd paragraph is just not true. The Valpo QB spent a number of plays running for his life. The fact we got one sack doesn't speak to the amount time he spent on his ass during the game. And the whole point of a cover 3 is to not let anybody behind you...
Ringneck's comment is absolutely true. You either watched a different game or have an agenda.

http://www.egriz.com/grizboard/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=77029&p=1236771#p1236771
 
Back on topic, has there been any updates on the secondary injuries the last couple days?
 
Back
Top