stubbins said:Others have seen it...but he has chosen to wait until the best opportunity comes along where he feels he can best succeed...that's also genius. And ballsy. Just like his play calling...spsyk said:Umista said:Stitt is still on top.
Bobby was simply a maintainer and not a great coach. He rated out about a C+
Did a bad job at UNLV. Very bad in fact. Why would we want him back? Better than Delaney but that is all!
Pease would have a far better team than Bobby in all aspects! Yeah I'd take Pease.
I favor Stitt. Why? He is a genius when it comes to football. He is new exciting and is far and away better than any of the coaches we are talking about!
I don’t know that BH maintained any better that MD.
In the three years of MD tenure, his first year less than stellar, however with the circumstances I give him some slack, although the second two, 1and 1 against the Cats, and made the playoffs.
With that said MD wouldn’t be my choice, as a HC although other coaching positions were just fine.
Using the term genius for Stitt is very generous, considering until the Griz showed some interest, you probably, never heard of him.
If he is the genius that you claim, i doubt very much he would have spent 15 years at a DII school, someone would have seen his genius long before this.
I dig him...
One question, did you ever witness one of his games, to identify this genius, or are you making your assessment on here say.