• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Brady Gustafson

Status
Not open for further replies.
Food for thought

QB #1 has a 147 rating and played the #1 pass defense in the country

QB #2 has a 147 rating and played the #100 pass defense in the country

Who was the better QB?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Yukon said:
Brady QB rating for the game = 147.8

The problem with QB ratings you do not know if it is because of the QB or the defense.

An average WB can have a great rating if the defense isn't good or has ran out of gas.

Looks good on paper


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Food for thought

QB#1 has a 147 rating playing the #1 rated passing defense

QB#3 has a 147 rating playing the #100 rated passing defense

Without seeing a play who would you say had a better game?
 
AZGrizFan said:
mtgrizrule said:
I will be surprised if any of his critics and naysayers give him the praise and respect he deserves for his 2nd half play. Thankfully, Coach Stitt and the team have much more faith in Brady than many GRIZ fans. It takes some amazing fortitude to bounce back from a terrible 1st half to play a brilliant 2nd half. .... GREAT job in the 2nd half Brady, the whole offense, and the coaches for terrific adjustments!!!! :thumb:
If he has THAT first half against just about any other team on our schedule, we're down 28-0 and even the 2nd half he had yesterday wouldn't bring us back. Gonna be tough to win a lot of games with a QB who regularly plays half a game.....let's hope Brady's not that guy.
Posters are acting like this was Brady's first game, new receivers, first game jitters, etc.

No. This was Cal Poly, last half of SDSU, the whole of NDSU, and now the first half of SFU. In fully half of the games Brady played in last season, he had games like that first half, including the last six quarters of the season when the team was at its most experienced, the receivers as tuned in as you're going to get.
 
Bscwatcher said:
Food for thought

QB#1 has a 147 rating playing the #1 rated passing defense

QB#3 has a 147 rating playing the #100 rated passing defense

Without seeing a play who would you say had a better game?

answering your specific..........question......it seems that both had a pretty good..........game........
 
grizindabox said:
Bscwatcher said:
Food for thought

QB#1 has a 147 rating playing the #1 rated passing defense

QB#3 has a 147 rating playing the #100 rated passing defense

Without seeing a play who would you say had a better game?

answering your specific..........question......it seems that both had a pretty good..........game........

Specific question was "better game"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Bscwatcher said:
grizindabox said:
Bscwatcher said:
Food for thought

QB#1 has a 147 rating playing the #1 rated passing defense

QB#3 has a 147 rating playing the #100 rated passing defense

Without seeing a play who would you say had a better game?

answering your specific..........question......it seems that both had a pretty good..........game........

Specific question was "better game"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

my point was....from what you offered.....who knows.....the #1 rated passing defense.....could have played only 1 game.....and it was against Cal Poly.........
 
grizaremoregooder said:
Brady Gustafson is the best quarterback on the roster right now. He is a very steady hand and a solid player. The Griz lose to SFU without him on the field.
I'm not a BG basher, but this characterization is inconsistent with his output. His biggest problem is he does not protect the football. Check out his turnovers for his most recent games. Four this game, two fumbles, two ints. Certainly not "a very steady hand." Has to change as the opponents get tougher.
 
Ursa Major said:
Bardy is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.

Happy now?

If only you could have met Mother Theresa...she's a saint :!:
 
And he has 7 turnovers in his last 8 quarters off football including 6 INTs. That ain't gonna get it done when we start playing the varsity portion of our schedule....THIS weekend.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Let's wait for the next two games before we throw Gus under the bus. Nope, I never played QB so I can't do anything but guess about his future. I tend to think he will get better as we move on. Why? He has improved in the small things he has done wrong in the past. His motion, footwork, wild throws and reads. When he gets rid of the ball quickly he is on. Yes, his mistakes are still obvious but in my opinion he is improving. I wish he had more games under his belt as that would help make him a better QB. Watch him the next two games and then let's decide.
 
Umista said:
Let's wait for the next two games before we throw Gus under the bus. Nope, I never played QB so I can't do anything but guess about his future. I tend to think he will get better as we move on. Why? He has improved in the small things he has done wrong in the past.
He seemed like he had added more of a running game this time, but in checking the stats, I see the net was just 29 yards. That diving, rolling TD made me nervous about shoulder separations from a big guy like that.
 
PlayerRep said:
BG is 5th in the nation in passing yardage and 5th in passing TD's. 23rd in nation in passing efficiency.
Well, as per my observations last year, when he has a good quarter, it's a really good quarter, but when he has a bad one, it's really a bad one. And all told so far in his UM career, they are about 50/50. He was the most "variable" of the three QBs that played last year. And yes, those are just "numbers" but we saw those numbers in stark relief last weekend. Notwithstanding his very good personal statistics, that is not a first tier QB from the standpoint of winning games or making a winning season. Not yet, anyhow.

As I also noted at the time, in homogenizing the results of all three QBs, Brady was the most likely of the three UM QBs last season to throw interceptions.

Like everyone else, I hope to see improvements in consistency, but that was the troubling aspect of the St. Francis game. Brady is now an experienced QB. And yes, Lorenzo Jerome was certainly a star of the game for his interceptions, but that much better than what we will be seeing in the BSC? None of those teams will be also having their first game of the season, nor will they travel 2000 miles for a game. And not all will be playing us in Washington-Grizzly Stadium. Promises to be an interesting season.
 
Brady first half and forth quarter is where he left off last season, not sure if all the blame should be put on him, although replacing him in the second half may have answered some questions.

Brady is not a bad QB, in fact IMO I believe he is a good QB, he is just not in a good fit in the offense he is trying to execute, just my opinion.

If the game would have been lost, no doubt he would have been thrown under the bus.

The next few games is going to tell a lot about the offense for 2016, then I expect to see the excuses, in lieu of facts...
 
kemajic said:
grizaremoregooder said:
Brady Gustafson is the best quarterback on the roster right now. He is a very steady hand and a solid player. The Griz lose to SFU without him on the field.
I'm not a BG basher, but this characterization is inconsistent with his output. His biggest problem is he does not protect the football. Check out his turnovers for his most recent games. Four this game, two fumbles, two ints. Certainly not "a very steady hand." Has to change as the opponents get tougher.

Gus' two fumbles should be discounted because of the complete collapse of his o line on each play. I do not think he had confidence the line would be able to protect him and his play reflected it.
He made one bad decision on the first pick. The second pick was a well placed ball that was picked by an exceptional defender.
I am not pro Gus or anti Gus at this point but I do think he deserves more time this season.
 
One of the biggest issues I saw in the first half that contributed to the poor performance was the lack of seperation by our receivers. #22 is a shutdown CB, on top of his other skills, and the rest of the SFU D backfield did a fine job of jamming and covering. Bradys had few targets and had to hold the ball too long for the O line to handle all their stunts. Brady was rushed and had the first game jitters to boot. We seem to be forgetting 95% of our WRs are RS freshmen. There was some mis-comunication also. I'm not making excuses for Brady just callin it as I saw it. Whatever adjustments were made at halftime worked wonders on getting the WRs to release. I wasn't paying that much attention to SFUs 2nd half D (beer) but perhaps they were getting gassed and may have been dropping more into zone.
 
Didn't seem to have enough trust in his receivers in the 1st half. Instead of releasing the ball before the receivers made their break, he would wait for them to break open at the end of their route. With young receivers sometimes they don't always run the cleanest routes or end up where they need to be and maybe that was keeping the ball in his hands too long. 2nd half seemed to be way better. Probably something they talked about and worked on at half.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top