• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Bobby Hauck

Has Bobby taking this program as far as he can? I have been thinking about this ever since the firing of James Franklin. Bobby has been a very successful coach here at Montana and probably one of the best in FCS history. However, it doesn't feel like we are gaining any momentum to win National Championships. He is going to give us 8-10 wins every year, and every 5 years maybe get to 12 or 13. I am generally curious what others think about how far Bobby can take this football program. He has had 14 years at the helm with 0 National titles and only 1 conference championship since returning. In my opinion Bobby is a very good coach, but not elite. I am sure I will get flamed for this take. I think people are scared of what it looks like without Bobby, but there are a ton of young minds that could take this thing to the next level. Look how young coordinators are getting in major programs and the NFL. Just my opinion.
Bobby is a elite coach and the best coach we could possibly attract to UM. He has taken the program very far. We are 6-0. How much better should our record be this year, in your opinion. He had the team in the national championship game in 2024. If the Griz want to pay someone $100 million for a contract like Penn St, then perhaps we could get someone better. You are truly clueless. You certainly don't know how to evaluate coaches or programs.
 
Franklin got fired because of Cignetti. Oklahoma State had 4 winning seasons before Gundy got there. They are all relevant because this is college football and this is the landscape of college football. We are playing under the same rules, just different money.
I don't understand your complete assuredness that Franklin's firing is because of Cignetti. Could you explain why you are so certain that is the case? From my view, Franklin got fired because he lost games that he should have won. He got fired because he is .016 for a winning percentage against top 10 teams. He got fired for HIS performance, and nothing to do with Cignetti being good.
 
Franklin got fired because of Cignetti. Oklahoma State had 4 winning seasons before Gundy got there. They are all relevant because this is college football and this is the landscape of college football. We are playing under the same rules, just different money.
So you agree, Franklin was fired because of money and Gundy was fired because he turned OSU into a dumpster fire. Neither of these apply to Montana/Hauck. Neither of these are either relevant or apply.
 
Bobby is a elite coach and the best coach we could possibly attract to UM. He has taken the program very far. We are 6-0. How much better should our record be this year, in your opinion. He had the team in the national championship game in 2024. If the Griz want to pay someone $100 million for a contract like Penn St, then perhaps we could get someone better. You are truly clueless. You certainly don't know how to evaluate coaches or programs.
again, I don't understand why people are taking this as insulting or negatively. Has he reached his height with this program was the question. This is a forum for discussion. This post doesn't mean that is what I believe or have the opinion of. I understand the value Bobby brings to the University, have very good childhood friends who played for him, played in the NFL and coach in the NFL who love him and Bobby has always been more than friendly.
 
So you agree, Franklin was fired because of money and Gundy was fired because he turned OSU into a dumpster fire. Neither of these apply to Montana/Hauck. Neither of these are either relevant or apply.
Franklin was fired because he lost to Oregon and Cignetti beat them. Franklin had the highest winning percentage in Penn State history. Bobby Hauch is on that level in the FCS. That is where I found comparison. Again, it is not my belief, but the landscape.
 
How long did it take John Stiegelmeier to win a championship at SDSU?
26 years in total, 19 years if you only count the years he was in FCS.

He only ever won 3 MFVC championships in 15 years in the conference.

But he was the architect of where they are as a program today.

I wonder how many times a thread like this was written about him in those 25 years before he finally won it all.
 
I don't understand your complete assuredness that Franklin's firing is because of Cignetti. Could you explain why you are so certain that is the case? From my view, Franklin got fired because he lost games that he should have won. He got fired because he is .016 for a winning percentage against top 10 teams. He got fired for HIS performance, and nothing to do with Cignetti being good.
I think the top ten losing percentage was a huge factor and the one that had people talking the last few years. However, I believe the final straw was when Indiana beat Oregon the very next week and Franklin was fired on Sunday. I think most blue blood teams are now of the opinion they should be doing what Indiana has done and do not need as much time to build as before. I really think that was the final straw for Penn State.
 
again, I don't understand why people are taking this as insulting or negatively. Has he reached his height with this program was the question. This is a forum for discussion. This post doesn't mean that is what I believe or have the opinion of. I understand the value Bobby brings to the University, have very good childhood friends who played for him, played in the NFL and coach in the NFL who love him and Bobby has always been more than friendly.
I didn't take it as insulting. You provided your view and questions. I provided my direct response. I didn't say you shouldn't have said it. It's a fan board. A few people know something about the game and the program, and more than a few don't.
 
Franklin was fired because he lost to Oregon and Cignetti beat them. Franklin had the highest winning percentage in Penn State history. Bobby Hauch is on that level in the FCS. That is where I found comparison. Again, it is not my belief, but the landscape.
I don't think the Oregon result for those teams did in Franklin, it was how they responded in the following games, the ones that are more impactful on finances in a negative way. Again, you view of the landscape seems blurry.
 
26 years in total, 19 years if you only count the years he was in FCS.

He only ever won 3 MFVC championships in 15 years in the conference.

But he was the architect of where they are as a program today.

I wonder how many times a thread like this was written about him in those 25 years before he finally won it all.
That's a lot of patience.
I don't think the Oregon result for those teams did in Franklin, it was how they responded in the following games, the ones that are more impactful on finances in a negative way. Again, you view of the landscape seems blurry.
I don't think it's blurry at all. As Elrod pointed out his less than stellar winning percentage against ranked teams is a factor, but the nail in the coffin is Cignetti's success. These blue blood teams are not going to be as patient anymore. Cignetti winning at Indiana is a direct reflection of that fire.
 
How long did it take John Stiegelmeier to win a championship at SDSU?
The difference is JS won a Championship.

Hauck never will. Give him 40 years and get rid of more good FCS teams and he will still have his wedding ring and nothing more.

Is he even married? If not get rid of my wedding ring comment he won't have any jewelry on his hands
 
That's a lot of patience.

I don't think it's blurry at all. As Elrod pointed out his less than stellar winning percentage against ranked teams is a factor, but the nail in the coffin is Cignetti's success. These blue blood teams are not going to be as patient anymore. Cignetti winning at Indiana is a direct reflection of that fire.
The nail in the coffin was losing to a winless UCLA and Northwestern. That is when the money turned against him.
 
The difference is JS won a Championship.

Hauck never will. Give him 40 years and get rid of more good FCS teams and he will still have his wedding ring and nothing more.

Is he even married? If not get rid of my wedding ring comment he won't have any jewelry on his hands
Show us just a little more that you don't know s--t about Bobby Hauck.
 
Do you think they would have reached the mountaintop and continued to be the juggernaut they are today if they had moved on from him years ago?
I have no idea. The vision paid off. They weren't a visible program and not much tradition for that to be an issue for them. He wouldn't last that long now. However, that brings another question. If Bobby never left what could Montana have done in those years? I think that is always going to be the big what if.
 
The nail in the coffin was losing to a winless UCLA and Northwestern. That is when the money turned against him.
Those played a part, but not as much as Indiana beating Oregon in Oregon. Everyone will now chase what he did with Indiana. It's now proven you can win ANYWHERE with the right coach. Do you think Penn State will reach out to Cignetti?
 
Those played a part, but not as much as Indiana beating Oregon in Oregon. Everyone will now chase what he did with Indiana. It's now proven you can win ANYWHERE with the right coach. Do you think Penn State will reach out to Cignetti?
So are you saying Franklin gets fired if they beat UCLA and Northwestern because Indiana beat Oregon?
 
Back
Top