BozAngelesGriz
Well-known member
2-1 or better vs the cats and he stays. if he is 1-2 or god forbid 0-3 he's gone. and i don't think the rest matters.
I’d kind of like him to make the playoffs next year, and if he doesn’t I’m gonna be kind of underwhelmed.behappp said:Bobby needs to do the following
Year1- FTC
Year2- FTC and make the playoffs
Year 3 FTC and win more than one home playoff game
Should be doable. Especially since he will have first class ST play. Something that Stitt was still learning about in year 3.
grizghost said:....did not JMU coach turn around the program in a year..alpha male coach that players brought into
immediately ...so l would expect the same with Bobby!...getting players to play above their skill-set
is what makes a great teams..can't wait!
Art Spooner said:grizghost said:....did not JMU coach turn around the program in a year..alpha male coach that players brought into
immediately ...so l would expect the same with Bobby!...getting players to play above their skill-set
is what makes a great teams..can't wait!
JMU coach turned it around by loading up on drop-downs and getting them to buy into “team”. Not an easy thing to do, both finding the talent, especially for schools far away from population density and from finding the right fits to your culture. JMU is the exception rather than the rule in being successful with this approach. It can be risky if you over-do it.
Well, in 2003, 2004 and 2005, he went 1-2. Though, he made the playoffs each of those years, so that probably doesn't matter. :thumb:BozAngelesGriz said:2-1 or better vs the cats and he stays. if he is 1-2 or god forbid 0-3 he's gone. and i don't think the rest matters.
MissoulaMarinerFan said:Well, in 2003, 2004 and 2005, he went 1-2. Though, he made the playoffs each of those years, so that probably doesn't matter. :thumb:BozAngelesGriz said:2-1 or better vs the cats and he stays. if he is 1-2 or god forbid 0-3 he's gone. and i don't think the rest matters.![]()
You're joking, right? 7-4 in an unusually soft schedule with 6 of the wins (and one of the losses) vs real patsies. That team was closer to 5-6 than to 8-3. It's clear to anyone who knows the game that the real handicap was coaching, which has been fixed. Far tougher schedule this year, but the Griz will be in every game. And unlike the last 3 years, they will be better at end of the year than they are at the start.Ursus1 said:But Stitt was 7-4 and people said should have beaten the Cats and been in playoffs with that team ......so Bobby is inheriting a team that "should have been 8-3" so is getting a lot better team to start with than a typical new hire after firing. Anything less than a Cat win and playoffs will be a disappointing year in most eyes (otherwise why fired Stitt if 7-4/Cat losses/no playoffs is acceptable)Grizzoola said:BH is not coming into a successful program like he did the first time. He has a lot of work to do, and I support him. But, I'm not expecting too much next season, maybe even matching last season's record. We all need to sit back & let him know we support him, whatever the 2018 record is. He didn't have that at UNLV.
Ahh, he has a three year contract.dayday said:I think he has to make the playoffs next year at a minimum. That’s the expectation and what it should be for next year.
AZGrizFan said:Art Spooner said:grizghost said:....did not JMU coach turn around the program in a year..alpha male coach that players brought into
immediately ...so l would expect the same with Bobby!...getting players to play above their skill-set
is what makes a great teams..can't wait!
JMU coach turned it around by loading up on drop-downs and getting them to buy into “team”. Not an easy thing to do, both finding the talent, especially for schools far away from population density and from finding the right fits to your culture. JMU is the exception rather than the rule in being successful with this approach. It can be risky if you over-do it.
And yet JMU's success was continually held up by the "fire Stitt" crowd as the bellweather for how easy it was to turn a team/program around. :lol: :lol:
griz4life said:There are no sanctions anymore. Last year's team at 7-4 had the best record of any fbs or fcs team that fired its coach. That's not a tough program to "turn around" Hauck is a good manager. He's not going to change anything to the point of creating avoidable losses.
grizghost said:AZGrizFan said:Art Spooner said:grizghost said:....did not JMU coach turn around the program in a year..alpha male coach that players brought into
immediately ...so l would expect the same with Bobby!...getting players to play above their skill-set
is what makes a great teams..can't wait!
JMU coach turned it around by loading up on drop-downs and getting them to buy into “team”. Not an easy thing to do, both finding the talent, especially for schools far away from population density and from finding the right fits to your culture. JMU is the exception rather than the rule in being successful with this approach. It can be risky if you over-do it.
And yet JMU's success was continually held up by the "fire Stitt" crowd as the bellweather for how easy it was to turn a team/program around. :lol: :lol:
..stitt was let go because of low turn out in stadium attendance...losing to the cats...not making playoffs.
..this all amounts to loss of income to the school and local businesses..not hard to understand..in other words not trickle down..
Not how "easy", how "possible."AZGrizFan said:Art Spooner said:grizghost said:....did not JMU coach turn around the program in a year..alpha male coach that players brought into
immediately ...so l would expect the same with Bobby!...getting players to play above their skill-set
is what makes a great teams..can't wait!
JMU coach turned it around by loading up on drop-downs and getting them to buy into “team”. Not an easy thing to do, both finding the talent, especially for schools far away from population density and from finding the right fits to your culture. JMU is the exception rather than the rule in being successful with this approach. It can be risky if you over-do it.
And yet JMU's success was continually held up by the "fire Stitt" crowd as the bellweather for how easy it was to turn a team/program around. :lol: :lol:
PlayerRep said:dayday said:I think he has to make the playoffs next year at a minimum. That’s the expectation and what it should be for next year. Whether we have the horses to do that I don’t know yet. O-line and secondary are question marks at this point. I also don’t totally know scheme yet to say how it will fit. However, the firing of Stitt sent the message that the expectation is not to do a rebuild. Hauck is expected to take the talent he has and make it win games. He’s done it here before and the hope is to do it again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't necessarily agree. The message in the firing of Stitt is that you can't loss to the Cats and not make the playoffs in years 2 and 3.
PlayerRep said:dayday said:I think he has to make the playoffs next year at a minimum. That’s the expectation and what it should be for next year. Whether we have the horses to do that I don’t know yet. O-line and secondary are question marks at this point. I also don’t totally know scheme yet to say how it will fit. However, the firing of Stitt sent the message that the expectation is not to do a rebuild. Hauck is expected to take the talent he has and make it win games. He’s done it here before and the hope is to do it again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't necessarily agree. The message in the firing of Stitt is that you can't loss to the Cats and not make the playoffs in years 2 and 3.
kemajic said:Ahh, he has a three year contract.dayday said:I think he has to make the playoffs next year at a minimum. That’s the expectation and what it should be for next year.
dayday said:kemajic said:Ahh, he has a three year contract.dayday said:I think he has to make the playoffs next year at a minimum. That’s the expectation and what it should be for next year.
I am not saying he will be fired next year or should be but he will have failed if that doesn’t happen. I think that is fairly clear with this program.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kemajic said:Not how "easy", how "possible."AZGrizFan said:Art Spooner said:grizghost said:....did not JMU coach turn around the program in a year..alpha male coach that players brought into
immediately ...so l would expect the same with Bobby!...getting players to play above their skill-set
is what makes a great teams..can't wait!
JMU coach turned it around by loading up on drop-downs and getting them to buy into “team”. Not an easy thing to do, both finding the talent, especially for schools far away from population density and from finding the right fits to your culture. JMU is the exception rather than the rule in being successful with this approach. It can be risky if you over-do it.
And yet JMU's success was continually held up by the "fire Stitt" crowd as the bellweather for how easy it was to turn a team/program around. :lol: :lol: