Her writing is so far above us, how could we possibly understand?PlayerRep said:sdk.catfish said:Eriul » Mon Nov 13, 2017 4:23 pm
Those two posts were made about completely different topics and different times. They are correct with the exception of my one "probably." Are you just mad about something or are you just trying to find somewhere to analyze someone's points or posts on an informal forum? Even I do not do such analysis and I have an English degree...
Not mad, just pointing out that in one post you criticize a poster as being speculative after earlier posting something as speculative as this:
Eriul wrote: ↑Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:42 am
Fact is simple... you don't extend stitt after this year and we get 2+ more years of the team being unranked.
Even adding the word "probably" doesn't make it better as it is just another degree of pure speculation - the word "possibly" would be far more accurate. I guess I would think someone with an English degree might try to be more articulate. As for me I'm hanging with my opinion before the season started which a pretty low bar. Stitt should get an extension if the Griz go 7-4 with either a playoff invitation or a win over the Cats. He can still do that. I really wish some school would offer him a job and he would take it but that isn't going to happen right now. In other words I disagree with you hypothesis that we are guaranteed another 2 years of mediocrity if he isn't retained. As has been noted previously on this forum, it is a FACT that first year coaches can win and win big.
Did anyone really believe that Eriul actually believed that what she said was a "fact"?
Not so. Something very important needs to be fixed on Saturday.Mavman said:As Az griz pointed out almost everything folks complained about has been fixed so why not support this staff and these kids and get on board?
Certainly a true statement.sdk.catfish said:... As has been noted previously on this forum, it is a FACT that first year coaches can win and win big. [my underline]
He has a chance. There is a rumor that Cookus may defect to UCLA next year. Gubrud will be back at EWU. Meier at UCD is very good.Eriul said:BW, do you think Jensen will be in the conversation with these guys next year for best QB in conference?
IdaGriz01 said:Certainly a true statement.sdk.catfish said:... As has been noted previously on this forum, it is a FACT that first year coaches can win and win big. [my underline]
However, if you have been paying attention (some ways back, I'll admit), the reality is -- proven by the numbers -- that first year coaches HARDLY EVER "win and win big." (Other people can SHOUT too.)
HelenaHandBasket said:Eriul said:HelenaHandBasket said:Eriul said:read what he was referring to asshole.
some of your posts are so blatantly ignorant and arrogant it makes me wonder how you function in the real world.
And by the way, he was referring to you...the only person that even brought up the "if Cookus" and "if Phillips" in a post.
...
so... you're admitting you didn't initially read and now you're trying to prove my point for me? Thanks.
Not really. And by the way, NAU wins big if Cookus doesn't get booted. Now get all crampy.
AZGrizFan said:eGriz "Stitt needs to be fired" Arguments:
1) Can't win on the road. When he beats the 'scats on Saturday, he'll be 3-1 on the road this year in FCS games. Argument null and void.
2) Ended last season on a horrible slide and lost the locker room. When he beats the 'scats on Saturday he'll have ended THIS season winning 6 of 7, INCLUDING three road games. These players LOVE playing for him and it shows, both on the sidelines and in the locker room.
3) His defense sucks--they give up 30 points a game and 500 yards of offense a game and show no improvement and he won't fire Semore. Last four games, they're 3-1 and have given up 343, 298, 218 and 362 yards (306 average). 17, 41, 15, 14 points. They're 2nd in sacks. 1st in INT's. 2nd in RZ defense. 6th in YPG. 5th in rushing D.
4) He can't win the big game. NDSU, SDSU, EWU, MSU, NAU (and MSU this weekend). Okay, this one is a little week, but he hasn't had a ton of chances this year...EWU and WSU being the notable exceptions).
5) His offense is too complicated and too easily defended. This year they've scored 45, 56, 41, 45, 39, 41, 27, 17, 44. < 20 once. < 30 twice. > 40 SIX times. #1 in scoring offense. #4 in total offense. More RZ TD's than ANY TEAM in the conference.
6) He can't and won't make halftime adjustments. ISU: 21 points in 1st half, 10 in 2nd. WSU: 34 points in 1st half, 7 in 2nd. NAU: 172 yards in 1st half, 111 in 2nd. Weber: scored 6 in 1st half, 21 in 2nd half.
What else...I'm sure I'm missing some.
Haslam ought to be waiting in the tunnel to give Stitt a new 3-year contract after we smack down the skiddy kitties this weekend.
Mavman said:Time to be honest how many of you want the Griz to lose so that Stitt will not be retained?
How many of you will be pi$$ed if Stitt wins and he gets an extension?
Be honest will some of you ever be able to root for stitt no matter he does?
Why or what has Stitt done to make sooo many of you soooooooo angry?
I hope he gets a 3year extension win or lose.
As Az griz pointed out almost everything folks complained about has been fixed so why not support this staff and these kids and get on board?
Eriul said:BW, do you think Jensen will be in the conversation with these guys next year for best QB in conference?
Not BW, but as I've said in another thread, this year he leads the Big Sky in Yards/Attempt and TDs/Attempt, and if you control for games he's actually played in, he leads the conference in yards/game.Eriul said:BW, do you think Jensen will be in the conversation with these guys next year for best QB in conference?
Gaeilge1 said:I am not a big Stitt fan. That is not news. However I will give credit where it is due and Coach Stitt has earned a modicum of credit for the overall improvement the team has shown the last half of the season. Most notably to me is the apparent change in Stitt's own mindset in play calling and the unnecessary risks that are no longer being called!
HOWEVER, I said at the beginning of the year that the team must show significant improvement before an extension should be granted. At this point I do not believe that significant improvement is in evidence. If they win handily this weekend I might change my mind. Even then I would think a three year extension is excessive.
While I am a bit upset about all of the Mick Delaney critics, I actually wonder where the program would be if Robin Pfluhgrad had not been wrongly terminated?
Two other quick points need to be made. I am concerned about the idea that last year's team up and quit at the end of the year. This not only does not reflect well on last year's coaching but does a grave disservice to all of the young men who busted their butt's for our entertainment. They may not have been successful but to suggest they quit is pure bullshit!
The other point is that we need to accept the possibility that even with a win this week there is still no guarantee that the Griz will get an at large bid. If NAU wins this week I am not that confident UM gets a bid over Weber, NAU, or SUU. If the Committee takes 4 BSC teams I would think UM and EWU would battle for that last spot and given the head to head matchup I am not sure an 8-3 record will trump a 7-4 record with a win over that 8-3 team on the résumé.
kemajic said:Not so. Something very important needs to be fixed on Saturday.Mavman said:As Az griz pointed out almost everything folks complained about has been fixed so why not support this staff and these kids and get on board?
Gaeilge1 said:The same can be said about Delaney! Yet you and other's keep bringing him up!
Is it an oversight or a real decision to exclude the leading BSC passer, Meier of UCD, from the "best QB in the conference" discussion?BWahlberg said:Cookus is neck and neck with Gubrud in consideration for best QB in the conference
kemajic said:Is it an oversight or a real decision to exclude the leading BSC passer, Meier of UCD, from the "best QB in the conference" discussion?BWahlberg said:Cookus is neck and neck with Gubrud in consideration for best QB in the conference