• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Baer’s D after 2 games

AZGrizFan said:
zootownrox said:
One thing that concerns me about the defense now is that it is pretty high risk high reward, just like Semores was. When the Griz get no pressure on the quarterback we get exposed deep, and that happened numerous times against WIU. I think Nuanez on the ESPN show had a similar take. I just worry that teams with decent lines that have been able to look at our first three games will pick us apart. I hope Baer has another wrinkle to add now that conference play has started.

Pretty much ANY defense that fails to get pressure on the QB (in whatever scheme/stunt that's called) will get "exposed" deep....those guys can't cover forever.....

I agree, but I think the lack of pressure is a personnel issue, not schematic.
 
Ursus1 said:
Can't get pressure on QB with the front, need to blitz. That is not a good long term plan

This is my main concern when you're talking pass rush. Don't have "a dude" that scares teams and they are forced to bring extra guys. If someone can develop into a pass rush specialist that'd' be great...thank you Santa
 
AZDoc said:
Ursus1 said:
Can't get pressure on QB with the front, need to blitz. That is not a good long term plan

This is my main concern when you're talking pass rush. Don't have "a dude" that scares teams and they are forced to bring extra guys. If someone can develop into a pass rush specialist that'd' be great...thank you Santa


Sadly, I think had a very good pass rush specialist but he left. Don't want to rehash the "why", but he sure would have helped pressure the QB.
 
Ursus1 said:
AZDoc said:
Ursus1 said:
Can't get pressure on QB with the front, need to blitz. That is not a good long term plan

This is my main concern when you're talking pass rush. Don't have "a dude" that scares teams and they are forced to bring extra guys. If someone can develop into a pass rush specialist that'd' be great...thank you Santa


Sadly, I think had a very good pass rush specialist but he left. Don't want to rehash the "why", but he sure would have helped pressure the QB.

Fav had 2 tackles and no sacks last game against Dayton.
 
After 3 games:

#3 in scoring defense
#2 in pass defense efficiency
#9 in pass defense
#1 in run defense
#2 in total defense
#1 in sacks by
#3 in interceptions

Not many of us would have believed they’d been this good after two games with MVFC teams & one pretty good Pioneer league team. Not sure how long it lasts, but the defense has been great so far.
 
PlayerRep said:
Ursus1 said:
AZDoc said:
Ursus1 said:
Can't get pressure on QB with the front, need to blitz. That is not a good long term plan

This is my main concern when you're talking pass rush. Don't have "a dude" that scares teams and they are forced to bring extra guys. If someone can develop into a pass rush specialist that'd' be great...thank you Santa


Sadly, I think had a very good pass rush specialist but he left. Don't want to rehash the "why", but he sure would have helped pressure the QB.

Fav had 2 tackles and no sacks last game against Dayton.

After watching the games, what is your opinion on why they just seem to struggle getting the QB without blitzing? Other teams oline? Scheme (more contained rush style vs.get to QB)? Personnel on D line not the "sack" type, more run stoppers?

Also, as a former db do you see problems coming if pressure isn't increased without the blitz factor with the current cb/safeties (ie live by blitz, die by blitz)?
 
Ursus1 said:
PlayerRep said:
Ursus1 said:
AZDoc said:
This is my main concern when you're talking pass rush. Don't have "a dude" that scares teams and they are forced to bring extra guys. If someone can develop into a pass rush specialist that'd' be great...thank you Santa


Sadly, I think had a very good pass rush specialist but he left. Don't want to rehash the "why", but he sure would have helped pressure the QB.

Fav had 2 tackles and no sacks last game against Dayton.

After watching the games, what is your opinion on why they just seem to struggle getting the QB without blitzing? Other teams oline? Scheme (more contained rush style vs.get to QB)? Personnel on D line not the "sack" type, more run stoppers?

Also, as a former db do you see problems coming if pressure isn't increased without the blitz factor with the current cb/safeties (ie live by blitz, die by blitz)?

Don't really know. The opponents have seemed to have good or pretty o-lines, against the pass rush. They sometimes kept extra people in to block. They were like a stone wall at times. Often, UM hasn't gotten to the qb with the blitz either. The NI qb was very good at sensing pressure and turning away from it. At least, he wasn't looking downfield when he was turning and having to start his scramble.

I don't really watch the d-line or o-line. I don't know what UM's defensive and front 7 schemes are this year. Not sure what the 4th d-end/sometimes standup guy is supposed to do.

UM has lots of sacks, tho, altho many came against Drake.

Our front 7 are absolutely stuffing the run.

I like our secondary and our pass defense, with some glaring exceptions.

I like pressure, but it does expose holes in the secondary, especially if the blitz doesn't get there fast. I would keep pressuring, but have it coming from different places.

Maybe the problems is personnel; maybe it's scheme.

I suppose I could have said a lot of words by just saying I don't know.

What do you think?
 
I agree they seem like a wall against the run. I also think the personnel Baer likes up front are suited for that. Linebackers have done a great job hitting gaps created by the oline (seems like that might be the plan to occupy oline with dline and let the playmaker LBs get the actual tackles. Shaw may not have many tackles, but he is a major reason teams cant run inside he is occupying linemen and not getting pushed back. Seems we are winning the LOS on defense, like the opponents are on their defense. Dante has been stellar, dont think Buss is Buss yet? Lewis is a great run supporter. One thing is for sure they tackle far better than last year as a team.
 
Ursus1 said:
I agree they seem like a wall against the run. I also think the personnel Baer likes up front are suited for that. Linebackers have done a great job hitting gaps created by the oline (seems like that might be the plan to occupy oline with dline and let the playmaker LBs get the actual tackles. Shaw may not have many tackles, but he is a major reason teams cant run inside he is occupying linemen and not getting pushed back. Seems we are winning the LOS on defense, like the opponents are on their defense. Dante has been stellar, dont think Buss is Buss yet? Lewis is a great run supporter. One thing is for sure they tackle far better than last year as a team.

Yup, I agree. Good post.
 
PlayerRep said:
Ursus1 said:
I agree they seem like a wall against the run. I also think the personnel Baer likes up front are suited for that. Linebackers have done a great job hitting gaps created by the oline (seems like that might be the plan to occupy oline with dline and let the playmaker LBs get the actual tackles. Shaw may not have many tackles, but he is a major reason teams cant run inside he is occupying linemen and not getting pushed back. Seems we are winning the LOS on defense, like the opponents are on their defense. Dante has been stellar, dont think Buss is Buss yet? Lewis is a great run supporter. One thing is for sure they tackle far better than last year as a team.

Yup, I agree. Good post.


And Robby might have made some stupid penalties, been a little off in pass coverage at times, but he is great at run support and a sure tackler (personally have not seen him miss an attempt.....but ESPN+ coverage was tough to see what the hell was actually going on some times). He is green, but his ceiling is very high.
 
bgbigdog said:
After 3 games:

#3 in scoring defense
#2 in pass defense efficiency
#9 in pass defense
#1 in run defense
#2 in total defense
#1 in sacks by
#3 in interceptions

Not many of us would have believed they’d been this good after two games with MVFC teams & one pretty good Pioneer league team. Not sure how long it lasts, but the defense has been great so far.

Yeah, I’m not sure I buy the “not getting sacks”...we have 11 thru three games, along with 21 TFL’s....the way the D is designed it appears the line is not set up to get the sack’s, the LB’s are. Our LB core has 6.5 of the 11 sacks and 10.5 of the 21 TFL’s.
 
AZGrizFan said:
bgbigdog said:
After 3 games:

#3 in scoring defense
#2 in pass defense efficiency
#9 in pass defense
#1 in run defense
#2 in total defense
#1 in sacks by
#3 in interceptions

Not many of us would have believed they’d been this good after two games with MVFC teams & one pretty good Pioneer league team. Not sure how long it lasts, but the defense has been great so far.

Yeah, I’m not sure I buy the “not getting sacks”...we have 11 thru three games, along with 21 TFL’s....the way the D is designed it appears the line is not set up to get the sack’s, the LB’s are. Our LB core has 6.5 of the 11 sacks and 10.5 of the 21 TFL’s.

Interesting. I need to talk to a coach or player who can explain the basics of the D to me. Or maybe Brint will. I have never been around or followed a D scheme in this configuration.
 
Ursus1 said:
PlayerRep said:
Ursus1 said:
I agree they seem like a wall against the run. I also think the personnel Baer likes up front are suited for that. Linebackers have done a great job hitting gaps created by the oline (seems like that might be the plan to occupy oline with dline and let the playmaker LBs get the actual tackles. Shaw may not have many tackles, but he is a major reason teams cant run inside he is occupying linemen and not getting pushed back. Seems we are winning the LOS on defense, like the opponents are on their defense. Dante has been stellar, dont think Buss is Buss yet? Lewis is a great run supporter. One thing is for sure they tackle far better than last year as a team.

Yup, I agree. Good post.


And Robby might have made some stupid penalties, been a little off in pass coverage at times, but he is great at run support and a sure tackler (personally have not seen him miss an attempt.....but ESPN+ coverage was tough to see what the hell was actually going on some times). He is green, but his ceiling is very high.

Note that the late hit in the first game on the NI sideline was later determined by the conference to have not been a good call. He got a PI in that game on the receiver coming down the middle. I didn't see it, or a replay with the whole sequence, so don't have a view on whether it was a good call.

I don't recall what his other penalties were. What were they?
 
Pressure suggestion: DE's,Widen a foot or so, Get in a damn sprinters stance, get a toe hold, and fire across the LOS like a scalded dog with your hair on fire. Go "Balls to the Wall" and create HAVOC!!. Go Griz: 2-1
 
PlayerRep said:
Ursus1 said:
AZDoc said:
Ursus1 said:
Can't get pressure on QB with the front, need to blitz. That is not a good long term plan

This is my main concern when you're talking pass rush. Don't have "a dude" that scares teams and they are forced to bring extra guys. If someone can develop into a pass rush specialist that'd' be great...thank you Santa


Sadly, I think had a very good pass rush specialist but he left. Don't want to rehash the "why", but he sure would have helped pressure the QB.

Fav had 2 tackles and no sacks last game against Dayton.
What’s your point? Have you watched any of the games? He’s played very well. He does start but plays only about 20 plays per game for now.
The NEC is a very different situation then the big sky. Only the division winner gets into the playoff. Non conference games and win/loss don’t matter.

The objective is to keep everyone healthy and fresh until conference play starts. When they do the starters will get the vast majority of the playing time.
 
The conference determined the late hit was not a good call? Seriously? Looked pretty late and obvious to me from where I was but I don't think I reviewed a replay of that particular hit.

Does the conference put out notes or something critiquing the officials each week?
 
signedbewildered said:
The conference determined the late hit was not a good call? Seriously? Looked pretty late and obvious to me from where I was but I don't think I reviewed a replay of that particular hit.

Does the conference put out notes or something critiquing the officials each week?

Teams submit a few plays each week to the conference, and the conference provides feedback to the teams. I doubt that any notes are put out publicly.

My view of the play, in real time and on the stadium replay, was that the flag should not have been thrown. I said that on the board, and was somewhat shouted down. The runner was running fast. It wasn't clear whether he would try to cut back, put his head down and take on the tackler, or step out of bounds. A defender has to be allowed to come into that situation at full speed. A defender coming full speed can't avoid contact if the runner starts to step out of bounds. While a defender has a sense pf the sideline, he isn't looking at the sideline or the feet of the runner; he is looking at the body of the runner. The particular hit was hard and it knocked the runner way out of the bounds. That, along with the chirping on the opponent bench, probably caused the flag, in my view. I thought the flag was thrown late too. I didn't have a great view, tho, as I was straight across the field in the upper deck.
 
Got it. Thanks. I'm one of them that was expecting a flag immediately but was in North End that game and didn't re-watch the particular play later.

Looked at that moment to have FLAG written all over it. I know if the tables were turned GRIZ fans would be having a fit if it wasn't called.
 
Back
Top