• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Bad Refs

GrizLA said:
EverettGriz said:
No, it says, "We're going to score the damn basketball and not give you an opportunity to do the same".
It might say that, but more often than not, doesn't work.....just like tonight....great coaches don't change their game plan unless forced to.....a drive in this game might have been a 3 pt play...and our D might have made a stop if our 7 footers couldn't rebound.....no one has yet to convince me that playing for the last shot is a good thing in the first half.....it is a championship game...go for it or go home...the Griz are going home....


I don't know, man. Where the odds are against you (like you said), and the other team is on a roll (like you said), it seems like even if no points are scored in the last 35 seconds of the first half, holding for the last shot "worked" because the other team didn't have the opportunity to score. I can see where you are coming from if UM was like LMU from the Kimble/Gathers years, but we are not.

Doesn't the shot clock, at least in part, exist to prevent teams from stalling and keeping the ball out of the other team's hands, thereby creating an unfair advantage?
 
stubbins said:
GrizLA said:
EverettGriz said:
No, it says, "We're going to score the damn basketball and not give you an opportunity to do the same".
It might say that, but more often than not, doesn't work.....just like tonight....great coaches don't change their game plan unless forced to.....a drive in this game might have been a 3 pt play...and our D might have made a stop if our 7 footers couldn't rebound.....no one has yet to convince me that playing for the last shot is a good thing in the first half.....it is a championship game...go for it or go home...the Griz are going home....


sounds logical, because we all know you can't drive to the hoop with 2 seconds left and get a 3 pt play....AND NOT GIVE THE OTHER TEAM THE BALL.
uh, you don't know much about bball, I can see......yes, it is quite common to see a shooter fouled in the process of making a scoring drive and get a free throw...but hey......the other team got the ball and failed to do anything...but, they won a game that was close...sometimes, you have to try to score as much as you can..when you can.....
 
On the other hand, I once saw Weber State playing UNLV in Las Vegas. before holding the for the last shot became the norm, score 5 points within 12 seconds when Tarkanian decided to go for the last shot....If I recall Weber won.....
 
grizd said:
GrizLA said:
grizd said:
GrizLA said:
But, officials do not shoot the ball nor ignore rebounding efforts....nor go for the last shot in a half while the other team is home, favored, and on a roll.....

You've said this in another thread and I don't undertand what you're trying to say. Are you saying they should have shot the ball and given UNC who was on a roll another chance to score in the half? If so you don't understand basketball or sports for that matter.
When the odds are stacked against you but the defense is playing well, stop the batshit crazy holding of the ball for the final shot...I have watched this year incredulous as to how many teams do this and it fails in around 65%..yes, I am saying go for the shot, possible foul, or go home....you, my friend, are drinking the kool aid....going for the last shot in a half is simply a way of saying, we think you are the better team.....amazing how many coaches fall for it, but not the greats, generally....

Name one coach not named Paul Westphal that would take an early shot. Phil Jackson, Roy Williams, Bobby Knight, Coach K, etc, etc, etc would all hold for the final shot. You may be drinking a spiked kool aid. :D
Jerry Tarkanian....he held the ball in a surprisingly tough game in
Vegas with Weber State, and as I recall, lost when Weber got the ball, scored, and got it again and scored....Vegas lost the game...they were winning in the final 9 seconds...He swore to never go for the last shot, and he didn't....Phil Jackson will do it now and then but admits it is only when his team is playing poorly....and even then, not often.....doesn't matter what I am drinking...the Griz did not win...and i do not blame the refs.....
 
GrizLA said:
grizd said:
Jerry Tarkanian....he held the ball in a surprisingly tough game in
Vegas with Weber State, and as I recall, lost when Weber got the ball, scored, and got it again and scored....Vegas lost the game...they were winning in the final 9 seconds...He swore to never go for the last shot, and he didn't....

Do you mean that he swore to never hold for the last shot ever again? That said, if UM was like UNLV in the Tark years, I wouldn't want them to hold the ball for more than 5 seconds without shooting!
 
CDAGRIZ said:
GrizLA said:
grizd said:
Jerry Tarkanian....he held the ball in a surprisingly tough game in
Vegas with Weber State, and as I recall, lost when Weber got the ball, scored, and got it again and scored....Vegas lost the game...they were winning in the final 9 seconds...He swore to never go for the last shot, and he didn't....

Do you mean that he swore to never hold for the last shot ever again? That said, if UM was like UNLV in the Tark years, I wouldn't want them to hold the ball for more than 5 seconds without shooting!
Forget it.....some people play to win, others play not to lose....
 
GrizLA said:
CDAGRIZ said:
Do you mean that he swore to never hold for the last shot ever again? That said, if UM was like UNLV in the Tark years, I wouldn't want them to hold the ball for more than 5 seconds without shooting!
Forget it.....some people play to win, others play not to lose....

Hey man, I hear you. Differing philosophies, I guess. I don't know nearly as much about basketball as Tinkle, let alone all the other CBB coaches who hold for the last shot, so I give them a degree of deference on this issue that perhaps you don't. What I won't do is call you stupid or an idiot for having a different view.
 
Officials: Chris Rastatter, Scott Twardoski, Ruben Ramos
I hope they lose their jobs. They need to learn that they will be held accountable for their actions just like in any other employment. Somehow, though, I don't even expect a public apology from the BSC since they've always have been anti-UM.
 
Paytonlives said:
votb said:
I gotta tell you guys...as much as I love Griz fans and their enthusiasm for UM Athletics, you are the last ones that should be complaining about the refereeing. I call games on the radio around the Big Sky and around the country. I've called games in Dahlberg for 23 years, and there is no other Big Sky school...not one, that gets the benefit of HOMER refereeing like Montana. You even homered us in our own gym a few years ago when the refs refused to give the Griz a technical at the end of regulation for calling a timeout when you had none left with about a second left to play...and it forced the game into OT where you won (which I give you credit for).

By the way, I watched that last blocking call over several times in slow-mo to make sure, and the refs got it right. The Griz defender has his feet planted, but his upper body was still on the way to being upright (still moving) when contact was made. If the game would have been in Dahlberg and Cherry had the ball and they called the same foul on Beitzel, you would have said it was absolutely the right call...no question. I didn't have a dog in this fight tonight, so there's no bias. If you want to see somebody who had the right to bitch about crappy officiating, see the Rutgers coach.

Votb,

You are an idiot... By your definition of Blocking/charging it COULD NEVER BE a charge!! Every frigin charge call in a game the defender is moving at least a little. If you truely are an announcer (Which I have my doubts), you would not say such stupid things.

Agreed. votb is an idiot, and a crappy announcer. He doesn't even know the rules of the game. Apparently not aware of the officiating policy to call fouls against players who put their shoulder down and initiate contact. An offensive player cannot run over a defensive player who is in front of him. If the offensive player is not jumping, it doesn't matter if the defender is not stationary if the offensive player lowers the shoulder and initiates the contact.
 
Here's the thing....

The charge/block call is the toughest call for a basketball official to make. It's a total judgement call and in that situation where UM has been "intentionally" fouling player immediately after catching the inbounds pass, I'm not surprised the official anticipated a defensive foul.

That said, the ref made the mistake of anticipating the call, and I think he missed it. But, it happens all the time at all levels...it's part of the game.
 
DoubleNicks said:
Officials: Chris Rastatter, Scott Twardoski, Ruben Ramos
I hope they lose their jobs. They need to learn that they will be held accountable for their actions just like in any other employment. Somehow, though, I don't even expect a public apology from the BSC since they've always have been anti-UM.
You hope they lose their jobs? So, a job, that is purely judgments of human beings on other humans, is something someone should be fired over because they made mistakes? Right... You act like it is an exact science. They should be accountable for mistakes, but losing a job is a tad to far.
*Head explodes* The BSC is anti-UM? Isn't UM their biggest draw? Why would they cut off the hand that feeds them?
 
PlayerRep said:
Paytonlives said:
votb said:
I gotta tell you guys...as much as I love Griz fans and their enthusiasm for UM Athletics, you are the last ones that should be complaining about the refereeing. I call games on the radio around the Big Sky and around the country. I've called games in Dahlberg for 23 years, and there is no other Big Sky school...not one, that gets the benefit of HOMER refereeing like Montana. You even homered us in our own gym a few years ago when the refs refused to give the Griz a technical at the end of regulation for calling a timeout when you had none left with about a second left to play...and it forced the game into OT where you won (which I give you credit for).

By the way, I watched that last blocking call over several times in slow-mo to make sure, and the refs got it right. The Griz defender has his feet planted, but his upper body was still on the way to being upright (still moving) when contact was made. If the game would have been in Dahlberg and Cherry had the ball and they called the same foul on Beitzel, you would have said it was absolutely the right call...no question. I didn't have a dog in this fight tonight, so there's no bias. If you want to see somebody who had the right to bitch about crappy officiating, see the Rutgers coach.

Votb,

You are an idiot... By your definition of Blocking/charging it COULD NEVER BE a charge!! Every frigin charge call in a game the defender is moving at least a little. If you truely are an announcer (Which I have my doubts), you would not say such stupid things.

Agreed. votb is an idiot, and a crappy announcer. He doesn't even know the rules of the game. Apparently not aware of the officiating policy to call fouls against players who put their shoulder down and initiate contact. An offensive player cannot run over a defensive player who is in front of him. If the offensive player is not jumping, it doesn't matter if the defender is not stationary if the offensive player lowers the shoulder and initiates the contact.


Player Rep...Thank you so much for assessing my IQ, and of my career abilities. First of all, your assessment of which player "initiated contact" is totally colored by your "maroonness", which I totally understand, admire and get. The great thing about Griz fans is their intense loyalty and inability to see any situation through anything but "maroon-colored" glasses. Late in the season, I realized that I had let myself get carried away in my announcing by my disdain for some officials in the league (see, we all have it), and had let complaining about officiating become too much a part of my broadcasts. Subsequently I backed off, and feel it made me more effective as an announcer. but I had to take off the orange-and-black glasses in order to do so. You're a Griz fan, and I would be disappointed if you behaved any other way.

However, your assessment of what constitutes an offensive foul is repudiated by calls made in almost every single basketball game ever played when defensive players are backing up, giving ground, when a ball-handler drives into them, initiating contact and knocking them over backwards, and 99-percent of the time a blocking foul is called, dribbler's shoulder lowered or not. Almost never is a ball-handler like Devon Beitzel (or Will Cherry, or most every other player for that matter) standing straight up while they're dribbling...they're leaning into the dribble. And in this case, Beitzel was already in the low-running position when he caught the pass, trying to make a corner around the first Griz defender that was there. There was no intentional lowering of the shoulder, as Beitzel never even saw the defender until they collided...his head was turned back towards the passer until after he caught the ball. By your definition, a low-post player (like Brian Qvale) would foul out of almost every game by backing a defender out of his "already-established" position in order to get the defender off-balance and create a better shot. I mean, if a defender doesn't have to be already set and stationary, then it certainly has to be a charge if the defender is stationary and gets knocked backwards.

In this case, the refs had to make a bang-bang call, which they did. Like I said, if the tourney had been played in Missoula, and if the same call had been made with the Griz inbounding and Will Cherry drew the foul from a UNC defender, you would have applauded the refs for making a great call, and you would never back down from your assessment that it was the right call. And if the game had been played in Missoula, and the Griz was the team with the ball in that situation, the refs would, indeed, have made the same call.
 
Ugghh! Thursday morning, the hangover. I feel like those zebra bastards slipped me a date rape drug and f**ked me over REAL GOOD. If I feel this bad, it really sucks and is a shame how the team must feel. That's the really sad part about last night, they didn't even allow a fair game to be played. Really sad for the players, especially Qvale. :(

And boy oh boy this game has really brought the IDIOTS out of the woodwork!
 
votb said:
PlayerRep said:
Paytonlives said:
votb said:
I gotta tell you guys...as much as I love Griz fans and their enthusiasm for UM Athletics, you are the last ones that should be complaining about the refereeing. I call games on the radio around the Big Sky and around the country. I've called games in Dahlberg for 23 years, and there is no other Big Sky school...not one, that gets the benefit of HOMER refereeing like Montana. You even homered us in our own gym a few years ago when the refs refused to give the Griz a technical at the end of regulation for calling a timeout when you had none left with about a second left to play...and it forced the game into OT where you won (which I give you credit for).

By the way, I watched that last blocking call over several times in slow-mo to make sure, and the refs got it right. The Griz defender has his feet planted, but his upper body was still on the way to being upright (still moving) when contact was made. If the game would have been in Dahlberg and Cherry had the ball and they called the same foul on Beitzel, you would have said it was absolutely the right call...no question. I didn't have a dog in this fight tonight, so there's no bias. If you want to see somebody who had the right to bitch about crappy officiating, see the Rutgers coach.

Votb,

You are an idiot... By your definition of Blocking/charging it COULD NEVER BE a charge!! Every frigin charge call in a game the defender is moving at least a little. If you truely are an announcer (Which I have my doubts), you would not say such stupid things.

Agreed. votb is an idiot, and a crappy announcer. He doesn't even know the rules of the game. Apparently not aware of the officiating policy to call fouls against players who put their shoulder down and initiate contact. An offensive player cannot run over a defensive player who is in front of him. If the offensive player is not jumping, it doesn't matter if the defender is not stationary if the offensive player lowers the shoulder and initiates the contact.


Player Rep...Thank you so much for assessing my IQ, and of my career abilities. First of all, your assessment of which player "initiated contact" is totally colored by your "maroonness", which I totally understand, admire and get. The great thing about Griz fans is their intense loyalty and inability to see any situation through anything but "maroon-colored" glasses. Late in the season, I realized that I had let myself get carried away in my announcing by my disdain for some officials in the league (see, we all have it), and had let complaining about officiating become too much a part of my broadcasts. Subsequently I backed off, and feel it made me more effective as an announcer. but I had to take off the orange-and-black glasses in order to do so. You're a Griz fan, and I would be disappointed if you behaved any other way.

However, your assessment of what constitutes an offensive foul is repudiated by calls made in almost every single basketball game ever played when defensive players are backing up, giving ground, when a ball-handler drives into them, initiating contact and knocking them over backwards, and 99-percent of the time a blocking foul is called, dribbler's shoulder lowered or not. Almost never is a ball-handler like Devon Beitzel (or Will Cherry, or most every other player for that matter) standing straight up while they're dribbling...they're leaning into the dribble. And in this case, Beitzel was already in the low-running position when he caught the pass, trying to make a corner around the first Griz defender that was there. There was no intentional lowering of the shoulder, as Beitzel never even saw the defender until they collided...his head was turned back towards the passer until after he caught the ball. By your definition, a low-post player (like Brian Qvale) would foul out of almost every game by backing a defender out of his "already-established" position in order to get the defender off-balance and create a better shot. I mean, if a defender doesn't have to be already set and stationary, then it certainly has to be a charge if the defender is stationary and gets knocked backwards.

In this case, the refs had to make a bang-bang call, which they did. Like I said, if the tourney had been played in Missoula, and if the same call had been made with the Griz inbounding and Will Cherry drew the foul from a UNC defender, you would have applauded the refs for making a great call, and you would never back down from your assessment that it was the right call. And if the game had been played in Missoula, and the Griz was the team with the ball in that situation, the refs would, indeed, have made the same call.

I get it...the ESPN announcers must be the amateurs :roll: ...they seemed to openly disagree with a few of the "foul" calls towards the end of the game.
 
votb, your detailed analysis of what constitutes a block over a charge is not correct. You obviously do not know the rule book. Without trying to impress you, but merely stating my credentials to make this comment, I was an NCAA official for 8 years, working the Ohio Valley and Metro Conferences. I also was a high school official for 15 years, including working state tournament games.

Last night, after watching the replay of that call several times, it was quite obvious that the wrong call was made. The rule clearly states that the defender must give a "player in the air" room to land before contact. However, Beitzel was NOT in the air, but was initiating his dribble when he made contact with the Griz player, who clearly had established court position, square to the contact, with both feet planted on the floor.

The official, in my opinion, violated a cardinal rule of officiated. That is, he made the call too quickly, without thinking of what actually happened on the court. We were always taught that getting the call correct was more important than making the call instantaneously, which is what this guy did. If he would have blown his whistle, took a moment to think about what occurred, relative to the rule, I think he would have made the correct call, which was a charging violation.

During my officiating career, especially earlier in my career, I made similar incorrect calls by reacting too quickly. As soon as I made the call, I wished that I could have taken it back. You learn that speed in making a call is not important, but getting the call right is. I believe that the official last night knew that he blew that call, but it was too late once he made it. Just sayin'.
 
So I play tennis early mornings on Thursdays at my club. Many there know I'm a Griz fan, and today I was proudly decked out in a Griz pullover during warm ups.

Four individuals came up to me independently and said (and I quote as closely as I recall):

"Man, sorry about the Griz last night. You guys got hosed".

"The refs didn't do you guys any favors, did they?".

"Wow. I don't recall ever seeing a game where every call went against one team like last night".

"The Griz should have won. That game was stolen from you. Montana was clearly the better team".


Now mind you, these are people in the Seattle area with absolutely no ties to the Griz. All of the conversations about the game were started by them (frankly, I was in no mood to talk about it), and the comments were not preceded by me saying anything about the officiating.

If completely independent people said the officiating sucked and was one-sided, I'm going to tend to believe them. And votb, you've been a decent poster in the past. I'm shocked by what you've said today. Did someone hack your account?
 
We missed 2 front end of 1-1's the last min. And DIED from 3-pt land.

Can't say we didn't have our chances.

So I guess the ref's and Griz weren't perfect.

Move on.
 
SeaGrizluvr said:
Ugghh! Thursday morning, the hangover. I feel like those zebra bastards slipped me a date rape drug and f**ked me over REAL GOOD. If I feel this bad, it really sucks and is a shame how the team must feel. That's the really sad part about last night, they didn't even allow a fair game to be played. Really sad for the players, especially Qvale. :(

And boy oh boy this game has really brought the IDIOTS out of the woodwork!

Here's what happened to you last night...

perfectly-timed-sports-23.jpg
 
Back
Top