I must admit, the coaching staff has done a pretty darn good job with the portal. one of the best trends I’m seeing is that the majority of transfers coming in have multiple years left to play. I think I saw 14 of the 18 have multiple years.
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
A Good Trend - Portal
- Thread starter HookedonGriz
- Start date
Can only watch old film and they of course have to show it on the field but I feel over all it's a higher level of athlete also. Everyone seems to have good speed
To me the amazing part is the only two "impact" players we lost were Wilson and Fife. IMHO Jackson was a liability...Racanelli WOULD have definitely helped this year...
On a negative note, to this. Them transferring in with multiple years of eligibility means they have more time they can transfer after this season. On a positive note, however, I like what seems to be the athleticism of most of these transfers this year. Been a long time since I have been to Nashville...
Ala Wilson and Rac. Both got some great film to sell themselves up...but as CDA says, that may be the new normal...
Come here, excel as a frosh/soph/junior, and we'll be your stepping stone to bigger things.
This has been my general takeaway too - I really like that they're bringing in guys that can develop over the course of years - not just 1 season. I understand a few transfers are 1 year guys and I would think the staff sees that those dudes will make a huge splash or fill a immediate need, which is great too.
Along with what AZ says, if they are transferring out to bigger and better places after the season, that usually indicates they had successful season. If they were successful, the team was probably successful as well. The coaches then go back to the portal...such is the new FCS football landscape..
The Msla TV news last night interviewed Welnel and Haslam; I thought I heard some one mention $31million in the NIL account. Have you heard anything like that?
Looks like the NIL has raised over $30,000,000. Wonder how that all works?
www.montanasports.com
'Navigating NIL': A discussion about name, image, and likeness at the University of Montana
With name, image, and likeness deals influencing player decisions in college athletics, many universities feel like it's spend to win, and the University of Montana isn't a stranger to that fact.
www.montanasports.com
Exactly, seriously.... $30,000,000?!
I’d be shocked if the collective has raised that much money. Even over 3 years I’d be shocked. I was guessing somewhere around 5M
If we truly had 30 millions, I find it hard to believe we would be 9-5 and double digit dogs as often as we are.
They updated the article. Just like we thought, that number was way off and was the amount raised by the entire athletic dept. Come on MTn sports, do better.
Looks like the NIL has raised over $30,000,000. Wonder how that all works?
'Navigating NIL': A discussion about name, image, and likeness at the University of Montana
With name, image, and likeness deals influencing player decisions in college athletics, many universities feel like it's spend to win, and the University of Montana isn't a stranger to that fact.
Big time typo haha - they've updated it removing the $30MM and put this note on the bottom:
Also doubt that 30 mil was raised...
My guess is that is total revenue...anyone know?
WaGriz4life
Well-known member
We have 30 million in private donations, outside of revenue, that we can use however we choose.
