PlayerRep said:grizonbob said:This discussion reminds me of a conversation I had two months ago with a couple of college professors (not in Missoula or Bozeman). We were talking about how students' aspirations/expectations have changed over the years, and the professors told me that most of today's students are much more practical in their approach to picking a school and determining a major. Because of the nation's economic struggles, they said, most students look hard at what college programs will jibe with their interests but also give them the basis for a secure economic future. They also are more aware of the dangers of amassing big student loan debt while being in majors that won't pay off that debt after they graduate.
With its heavy emphasis on liberal arts and majors like history, education, languages, communication, arts, and so on, UM is at a disadvantage in that environment. Especially when the other big draw in Montana, where students also benefit from relatively cheap tuition fees, is a school that focuses much more on science and tech, and just generally the sorts of fields where a student knows he has a decent chance of finding a good-paying job once he graduates.
I've seen this phenomenon with young acquaintances who graduated from UM with liberal arts degrees, only to find that the piece of paper they earned after years of study just isn't that marketable. One returned to school to train in a computer-related field, the other isn't sure at all what they will do next. I've also seen this first-hand in my own family, as my wife and I both graduated from UM, but our kids picked MSU for the reasons I spelled out. I also noticed this recently in reading through some of the profiles of the new recruits MSU football has picked up. I recall reading, for example, the one on the Collins' kid from Bozeman, who was attracting interest from a number of schools. He said his first reaction was to get out of Bozeman so he could have some new life experiences. But after looking at academic programs, he decided he couldn't do any better than the engineering program at MSU.
This won't be an easy problem to fix. A lot of colleges that focus heavily on liberal arts are struggling. Maybe these latest budget cutbacks will even help by forcing those who work at UM to rethink their priorities, including folks who have resisted change for decades.
While I agree with this to some extent, I don't think that most kids entering college are looking that carefully at what courses/programs are offered, what they will go into, and what types of jobs they will be able to get upon graduation. More probably are now, but not the majority. More are paying attention to payment/loans/debt, and that is probably a good thing.
Given what you stated, how does that fit with the recent press that MSU's ag program is booming, or at least that was my impression. Ag is not growing and booming, and there are fewer opportunities in ag than there used to be--or am I not right on that?
I'm still a big believer in the value of a liberal education. Generally, I believe that makes students more well-rounded, more able to adapt in and to the future, more likely to be tolerant, etc. It's not the only way to achieve those things, but it's a good and proven way.
On the other hand, UM seems to be suffering now from too much emphasis, or press, on things that don't seem to be as useful. Also, too much emphasis or press on global warming or extreme environmental stuff/classes. Also, the word is that UM's course offerings have been reduced, or made less frequent, so that it's hard to get certain degrees, or get them in 4 years.
I agree with a lot of what you say, actually. I'm no expert in higher education and what "most" students think, and so I was just relaying what a couple profs told me, as it seemed relevant to this discussion. It rang true to me as it was backed up by what I've heard and seen from young people going to or just getting out of school. But admittedly this is a small sample, and anecdotal info. Would be interesting to see an actual breakdown from surveys on what factors kids look at as they pick a school. Suspect UM administrators have this kind of information as they plan their pitches to prospective students. But if they do, they aren't using it very effectively, it would seem.
I'm also no expert in the MSU ag department, tho I did note, like you did, that the school recently said it was raising its profile, or making it a bigger priority, by giving the dean a promotion. Going online, I see that they have over a thousand students. I don't know the enrollment trends over the years in that department, however.
As for whether demand for its grads is growing or not, I don't know that either. While the number of farmers and ranchers has been shrinking, that might not affect most of the grads in this department. Ag will continue to be a huge industry as people still have to eat, regardless of how many folks are producing that food. And I suspect there are lots of companies out there, like the Monsantos of the world, that are quite healthy and growing, and will need lots of skilled labor to help make ag more productive, etc. Also, a lot of MSU's ag students no doubt go to work for government agencies like the Forest Service, BLM, and so on -- and government isn't shrinking.
I don't disagree about the benefits of a liberal-arts education. But I know that MSU has even students in science/tech programs taking these sorts of classes as part of their college experience. One example: One of my kids, who got an engineering degree, had to take a course his last year that involved going to ten or so lectures and workshops, and they all had to be on topics outside engineering. Then they had to write reports on them and discuss. It is still possible to give students some grounding in liberal arts while training them for science jobs and the like.
I also think, like you, that UM has suffered from image problems like those you describe. Anyway, thanks for the thoughtful response.