kevraid said:So when the GRIZ win and Sac state loses does that mean 8 games in Missoula on Thursday??
Mens and womens tournament 12th-14th
mtgrizrule said:kevraid said:So when the GRIZ win and Sac state loses does that mean 8 games in Missoula on Thursday??
Mens and womens tournament 12th-14th
The U of M managed both tournaments flawlessly a few years ago. Here is to praying Sac State loses and the GRIZ win. How awesome is it for this to come down to last day of the regular season?
On a side note, I am hoping SUU takes care of business and Weber State loses. If Weber State makes the tournament, they will be the 8th seed. That team is still dangerous. As a 1 seed, I'd much rather face SUU than Weber State.
marceagfan5 said:mtgrizrule said:kevraid said:So when the GRIZ win and Sac state loses does that mean 8 games in Missoula on Thursday??
Mens and womens tournament 12th-14th
The U of M managed both tournaments flawlessly a few years ago. Here is to praying Sac State loses and the GRIZ win. How awesome is it for this to come down to last day of the regular season?
On a side note, I am hoping SUU takes care of business and Weber State loses. If Weber State makes the tournament, they will be the 8th seed. That team is still dangerous. As a 1 seed, I'd much rather face SUU than Weber State.
Southern Utah and Weber are going to be nasty first games for the top seed or seeds (not sure if they can both make it). Finishing 3rd in conference might be a blessing in disguise...
mtgrizrule said:marceagfan5 said:mtgrizrule said:kevraid said:So when the GRIZ win and Sac state loses does that mean 8 games in Missoula on Thursday??
Mens and womens tournament 12th-14th
The U of M managed both tournaments flawlessly a few years ago. Here is to praying Sac State loses and the GRIZ win. How awesome is it for this to come down to last day of the regular season?
On a side note, I am hoping SUU takes care of business and Weber State loses. If Weber State makes the tournament, they will be the 8th seed. That team is still dangerous. As a 1 seed, I'd much rather face SUU than Weber State.
Southern Utah and Weber are going to be nasty first games for the top seed or seeds (not sure if they can both make it). Finishing 3rd in conference might be a blessing in disguise...
Speaking of Weber State, where are some of their fans? I miss a few of them that can actually talk basketball without the trash talk. It would be nice if their better posters at least let us know they are still with the living. :thumb:
marooncoloredglasses said:Since this is a different format(eight teams) than the last time one school had a double, would the ladies not play on Thursday. Then both semis would be held on Friday?
EverettGriz said:marooncoloredglasses said:Since this is a different format(eight teams) than the last time one school had a double, would the ladies not play on Thursday. Then both semis would be held on Friday?
Correct. No byes.
But the BSC site doesn't show the women's games starting Wed. That may have to happen though if UM hosts both. But yes, I would assume in either event that all 4 semi games would be held Friday.
DPGriz said:The fact that the tournament is coming down to last minute rescheduling or a rec center venue is probably making a permanent site even more appealing to the Big Sky decision makers.
DoubleNicks said:DPGriz said:The fact that the tournament is coming down to last minute rescheduling or a rec center venue is probably making a permanent site even more appealing to the Big Sky decision makers.
This is what I was thinking, as well. :x They might as well do away with the tourney at that point and just decide who to award the autobid to based off of the regular season. There really wouldn't be any incentives for the champions other than bragging rights (they've already gotten rid of the byes and then hosting rights are gone). Seeding usually doesn't matter because it's more about matchups and in the BSC, a 8th seed usually isn't too much worse talent-wise compared to a 3 seed.
I doubt a predetermined site would make any money unless it was Salt Lake City, Missoula, or Ogden (or possibly Billings or Spokane). And wherever the site ended up being it would always be closer and favor at least one team more than the rest (ie. Reno would favor Sac State, Las Vegas=SUU/NAU, Spokane=EWU/UM, Billings=MSU/UM, etc.)
Anyways, I'm a big supporter of rewarding the champions with hosting rights. If Sac State wins tomorrow then their players and staff deserve to host despite people being upset by their facilities (now, maybe the administrations could be fined by the conference if they didn't provide adequate facilities but the players shouldn't be punished).