NorthwestFresh said:They got their asses kicked in a monsoon in Portland, and their bright idea of senior leaders is to get back to Missoula, go out on Halloween until 2:30am, walk into a construction project on private property, and yet some of you clowns still defend them.
Other than the stupendous irony of you attacking anyone who discusses "facts" as you foam and froth about this "case" it is obvious that there is nothing you need to hear from anyone about anything. You are not just unhinged about it for some reason, you likely lost all your hinges some time ago.NorthwestFresh said:NativeGriz said:As would be expected from anything you post, you cherry picked a small part of the post to make some point and that does make you disturbingly creepy.
Tell me how an Attractive Nuisance case would apply here, or continue to add literally nothing other than personal shots at posters.
I pulled the moronic parts of that post, and wanted clarification about them.
Ursus1 said:The.Real.2506 said:that was already brought up by PR, but rejected since those players had their schollys yanked and suspended from playing for 1 yearBear Axed said:Sounds more like the Mayors house deal
But you can continue down that line of thought if you want :thumb:
tough to agree with a Cat fan...but you are correct, similar level of offense and MSU handled it firmly. Hope UM does the same or Griz football will get even more crap .....
NorthwestFresh said:UMGriz75 said:. The window isn't that far off of the sidewalk, you could practically jump into the window opening which really is quite large. There is rough scaffolding there. The structure was, in fact, open to the elements and any stray coyotes, deer, dogs, cats, birds, wombats and college students.
Had anyone been injured, this would have been an "attractive nuisance" case. Although major construction is obviously underway, there are no signs posted
I'm not sure which of these is the most disturbingly creepy thing here.
That this guy apparently has already staked out the house, that he's passive-aggressively blaming the home owners, or that he's comparing UM student-athletes to wildlife in terms of judgement.
:shock:
MTOutsider said:Please enlighten us. Homeowner was quoted saying " I hope that they aren't guilty of much more than being extraordinarily stupid."
Same can be said for the guy with a dui that killed someone or the guy playing with the gun that shoots someone. Granted there are various levels of Stupid. If they were just trespassing, so be it charge them with such and move on. If that is the case the bigger question is what will Stitt do. Does he have the balls to make an example and say enough is enough or will he tuck them in his wife's purse and say play on, business as usual in Griz town.
And that's my point. Knowing more about the circumstances, it's not "plausible" that they had criminal intent. Maybe they did, but it's not like I would expect anyone to leave valuables around an empty room with a giant window opening open to the outside and the open air. Knowing that eliminates the idea that they may have forced a door or a window open because that would, indeed, suggest a different level of intent. Knowing that there was likely no way they knew there was a family in the actual house also offers the perspective that they did not do this to scare the crap out of a family.PlayerRep said:Again, not saying those were the facts. I think it's important to know more about why they went into the structure.
PlayerRep said:This meaning: they were walking home from a Halloween party, it was cold and raining, they called a friend to get them, they saw the large opening steps from the sidewalk, thought the house was under construction and not occupied, and decided to go up the ladder/scaffolding, and then waited for their friend to arrive. Again, not saying those were the facts. I think it's important to know more about why they went into the structure.
NorthwestFresh said:UMGriz75 said:Aside from you and your creepiness, I live in the neighborhood. I am not "blaming" the owners, I am describing how it appears from the street -- you know, facts and stuff like that.NorthwestFresh said:UMGriz75 said:. The window isn't that far off of the sidewalk, you could practically jump into the window opening which really is quite large. There is rough scaffolding there. The structure was, in fact, open to the elements and any stray coyotes, deer, dogs, cats, birds, wombats and college students.
Had anyone been injured, this would have been an "attractive nuisance" case. Although major construction is obviously underway, there are no signs posted
I'm not sure which of these is the most disturbingly creepy thing here.
That this guy apparently has already staked out the house, that he's passive-aggressively blaming the home owners, or that he's comparing UM student-athletes to wildlife in terms of judgement.
:shock:
You posted that if someone was injured, it would be an "attractive nuisance" case for not securing the property. Those cases are typically for children who get injured, not grown men invading a structure at 2:30 am, although I'm quite sure some Griz fan attorney wouldn't mine trying to sue those evil homeowners for their unsecured/unmarked project.
Fans like you are why the program is such a Stitt show right now. I'm guessing that you've even considered contacting the city about this unmarked eyesore that 5 adults simply could not resist exploring.
When does the coddling stop?
grizcountry420 said:PlayerRep said:This meaning: they were walking home from a Halloween party, it was cold and raining, they called a friend to get them, they saw the large opening steps from the sidewalk, thought the house was under construction and not occupied, and decided to go up the ladder/scaffolding, and then waited for their friend to arrive. Again, not saying those were the facts. I think it's important to know more about why they went into the structure.
![]()
UMGriz75 said:And that's my point. Knowing more about the circumstances, it's not "plausible" that they had criminal intent. Maybe they did, but it's not like I would expect anyone to leave valuables around an empty room with a giant window opening open to the outside and the open air. Knowing that eliminates the idea that they may have forced a door or a window open because that would, indeed, suggest a different level of intent. Knowing that there was likely no way they knew there was a family in the actual house also offers the perspective that they did not do this to scare the crap out of a family.PlayerRep said:Again, not saying those were the facts. I think it's important to know more about why they went into the structure.
So, they had entered an area open to the outside with no likely intent except to explore or get out of the rain. If true, that does not rise to the level of a felony, burglary, but is trespass, a misdemeanor. Like all "laws" circumstances are everything, and this one just does not ring true for "criminal intent" and the homeowner himself appears willing to acknowledge that could be the case.
Raider said:grizcountry420 said:PlayerRep said:This meaning: they were walking home from a Halloween party, it was cold and raining, they called a friend to get them, they saw the large opening steps from the sidewalk, thought the house was under construction and not occupied, and decided to go up the ladder/scaffolding, and then waited for their friend to arrive. Again, not saying those were the facts. I think it's important to know more about why they went into the structure.
![]()
See, it's all about the weather!
I tell these f***[*] every time, and nobody listens! No rain, no felony.
Maybe you dudes will pay attention from now on!
SACCAT66 said:So did the house look like this
![]()
Or like this
![]()
Or like this
![]()
PlayerRep said:SACCAT66 said:So did the house look like this
![]()
Or like this
![]()
Or like this
![]()
It looks like most like 3, but with the house part in the background more and also under construction and without siding, and with the garage complete (at least on the outside) and with the room of above the garage completed enough to have a room on it and a big open window area. The Missoula bar association and realtors association had a tour today.
Grisly Fan said:Maybe the University needs to do mandatory training on entering unsecured construction sites?