2023 is not an anomaly. It's where Hauck as taken the program. 2024 is the anomaly.Can you read? Seriously? I literally have mentioned the NC season, pointing out that it doesn't change the fact that it has been an anomaly in his overall 2.0 body of work isnt dismissing it. You're the only one trying to dismiss an entire year of football, what a
This is just in the Big Sky:
Conference rank is not relevant. It's overall wins and losses, playoff appearances, and advancing in the playoffs. The Big Sky is a strong conference.
Do you think NAU was a better team than Montana this year?
I mean NAU didn't have their starting or 2nd String QB and we didn't show up for a entire half, kind of lucky we were only down 10 at that point.
NAU’s high conf rank took them deep in the playoffs this year and got them a high seed. All pre-game speeches of coaches are required to include conf rank. That UT guy is better than Herbstreit.
They don't know.
Isn't winning the conference one of Bobby's 4 main goals he talks about.....Scats/Conference/Natty/Graduation?
Yes, it’s a goal, but after regular season play and after the season, no one cares about conf rank, except some unknowledgeable fans. Advancement in the playoffs is what’s most important.
BH cares, part of his compensation is tied to it.
He doesn’t care after conference play is over. It’s not even in the rear view mirror. If he cared about money, he would have the 7 figure jobs he’s been offered.
Why did he negotiate it into his contract then?
Why wouldn't every coach negotiate it into their contract?
Why would negotiate something into your contract you didn't care about?
Pretty standard in this type of contract. Reality is that both parties will negotiate safeguards for themselves. An agent would be remiss to not negotiate it in.
An agent would be negligent to negotiate something into contract the client doesn't want because all things in contracts are accountability measures.
You can want to finish your career somewhere and still put coverage into a contract as a safeguard. Do you think the University decided to forego language to cover themself if he did decide to leave just because the client said he wasn't going to? Like I said, it is standard in this type of contract for both parties to include some type of language like this.
BH was in a power position. Everything in the contact are things he wanted including getting paid for winning the conference.
So? You once again are trying really hard to make nothing into something to fit your narrative. What I am telling you is buyout clauses are standard anymore.
