As a guy from the other side, I agree with you kemajic. I think Bodnar was an excellent fit for the job with his technology and management background in a very high level job. This was the strength that U of M needed in a leader. U of M was in a deep hole. It was going in the wrong direction in enrollment and morale at the school appeared to be low. I remember many comments on here from parents saying their HS kids got very little from U of M compared to what they were getting from MSU. MSU was way ahead with a highly organized and effective student recruiting program. He had a huge challenge when he took over and it has taken longer than many would like, but he has turned the corner and has things now going in a positive direction. Turning things around at a University is not an easy thing with an entrenched bureaucracy. Also, it looks like he is making good strides with infrastructure and in academic programs.
Copper also makes good points. The world changes. And, so will things change in the academic world. I agree, with the advent of AI and such, the academic world may change dramatically in ways we never envisioned. So hold on. As Yogi Berra once said, it ain't over until it's over.
PS: As far as NA enrollment, I think both schools are doing a great job. One school having a few more or less than the other is insignificant. The fact that both schools are increasing NA enrollment is a good thing.