139 points yielded to 3 teams who will not make the playoffs. Two of those games at WaGriz. That is historically bad defense for UM. Stop trying to sugar coat it. I grant you that you were correct last year in regard to the playoff committee. Most people admitted you were correct about that but because you are you, you made sure to bring that up and show it off to anyone and everyone like a toddler showing off a new toy. Beating Cal Poly and Northern Colorado by a lot is what the Griz are supposed to do. Just like the Cats have beaten up on the weak teams on their schedule as they were supposed to. That hardly represents a defensive renaissance.
You have bad takes all the time and either you are willfully ignorant or you are disingenuous with your arguments. You mentioned that MSU vs. Maine was somehow not a blowout when in reality the Cats pulled their starters in the 3rd quarter after going up 38-7. If you don’t watch the games, just admit it and move on.
I think Chance Wilson will develop into a good QB for the Cats. He will certainly get his opportunity to win in the job in the offseason. You say you are correct with your statement, but it is merely your opinion, not fact.
Look at the last 3 games. Yes, D was shaky for 2/3 games. But they've cleaned up mistakes. Cal Poly scored more on the Cats than on the Griz. So, does that mean the Cat D is weak?
Nope, I have mostly good takes. I take shots at the Cats and am aggressive at times, because I like to jab at the Cats and tease them. That's why I started this thread and titled it as such. My football arguments are almost all good. You are just making stuff or lying. I don't buy the pulled their starters BS. Even if they did, the backups gave up too many points. I guess the Griz backups are better than the Cat backups, because the Griz backups have not given up many points in some of their games.
Since you don't follow the Griz, talk to the coach, players and parents, and follow the games very closely, why don't you move on? You are on the wrong board.
On Chance Wilson, fine. However, again, I called BS on what a Cat poster had said about Wilson, then you jumped on me, and in jumping on me, you agreed with me. My point is that he hasn't played enough to prove that he's the guy yet. Why don't you just read what is said, and stop being wrong and a dick? What I state is, or course, my opinion, but it is often backed up with facts. It is my opinion, backed up by the facts, that Wilson hasn't played enough, played enough when the game was on the line, and shown that he is the guy for next year. Why do you continue to fight me on that, when you know damn well that what I said is correct (and you are saying almost the same thing).
No, most people fought me on the playoff committee rule/stuff. Very few supported me. Again, why don't you stick with the facts.
