ordigger said:SaskGriz said:argh! said:ranco said:That’s because you dislike Hauck so it skews your perspective and you are incapable of being objective. The griz played very well today. No question about that.
to be clear, i thought the other team, suu, played confused and disorganized football. the griz played closer to normal football, with some great plays interspersed. that would indicate that the griz coaching was better than the southern utah's. with the caveat that it is hard to expect your 4th string qb to come in and do great after a four year hiatus.
Does the NCAA still do that nonsense, where you can take years off for religious reasons? I remember watching my buddies on the great Griz cross country teams in the late 80s having to run against 27 year olds who were some how Juniors. Thought you had 4 to play 5?
I’m an old fart. I still have 4 to play 5.
poiuyter said:ordigger said:SaskGriz said:argh! said:to be clear, i thought the other team, suu, played confused and disorganized football. the griz played closer to normal football, with some great plays interspersed. that would indicate that the griz coaching was better than the southern utah's. with the caveat that it is hard to expect your 4th string qb to come in and do great after a four year hiatus.
Does the NCAA still do that nonsense, where you can take years off for religious reasons? I remember watching my buddies on the great Griz cross country teams in the late 80s having to run against 27 year olds who were some how Juniors. Thought you had 4 to play 5?
I’m an old fart. I still have 4 to play 5.
If a player is not enrolled in school, no eligibility is lost.
Clear you missed the UC Davis game - or only caught the first half. 46-0 in a half leaves little chance to win.grizband said:It's incredible that despite how bad the Griz looked much of the past 3 weeks, North Dakota is the only game they clearly had no chance to win.
kemajic said:Clear you missed the UC Davis game - or only caught the first half. 46-0 in a half leaves little chance to win.grizband said:It's incredible that despite how bad the Griz looked much of the past 3 weeks, North Dakota is the only game they clearly had no chance to win.
poiuyter said:ordigger said:SaskGriz said:argh! said:to be clear, i thought the other team, suu, played confused and disorganized football. the griz played closer to normal football, with some great plays interspersed. that would indicate that the griz coaching was better than the southern utah's. with the caveat that it is hard to expect your 4th string qb to come in and do great after a four year hiatus.
Does the NCAA still do that nonsense, where you can take years off for religious reasons? I remember watching my buddies on the great Griz cross country teams in the late 80s having to run against 27 year olds who were some how Juniors. Thought you had 4 to play 5?
I’m an old fart. I still have 4 to play 5.
If a player is not enrolled in school, no eligibility is lost.
PlayerRep said:poiuyter said:ordigger said:SaskGriz said:[/u][/b]
Does the NCAA still do that nonsense, where you can take years off for religious reasons? I remember watching my buddies on the great Griz cross country teams in the late 80s having to run against 27 year olds who were some how Juniors. Thought you had 4 to play 5?
I’m an old fart. I still have 4 to play 5.
If a player is not enrolled in school, no eligibility is lost.
That's not accurate. 5 to play 4, from when first enrolled in school. If under 10 credits, or 10 and under, you can be a grey shirt and not use eligibility. The exceptions for extension are medical redshirt, religious mission, military service, special circumstances like Jimmy Wilson, and I think pregnancy.
Paytonlives said:One word....
Fumbles
Without them Griz are 8-1 or 7-2
and the N. Dakota game started so crappy, who knows how that would have turned out.
argh! said:Paytonlives said:One word....
Fumbles
Without them Griz are 8-1 or 7-2
and the N. Dakota game started so crappy, who knows how that would have turned out.
without turnovers, the teams that lost to the griz would've won, for sure :roll:
IntuitiveGriz said:PlayerRep said:poiuyter said:ordigger said:I’m an old fart. I still have 4 to play 5.
If a player is not enrolled in school, no eligibility is lost.
That's not accurate. 5 to play 4, from when first enrolled in school. If under 10 credits, or 10 and under, you can be a grey shirt and not use eligibility. The exceptions for extension are medical redshirt, religious mission, military service, special circumstances like Jimmy Wilson, and I think pregnancy.
PR is correct.
Every human has 5 years to play 4. That clock does not start until you enroll FULL-TIME.
You could get your college degree all part-time and still have 5 to play 4 remaining!!!!!!!!!!!!
Silenoz said:argh! said:Paytonlives said:One word....
Fumbles
Without them Griz are 8-1 or 7-2
and the N. Dakota game started so crappy, who knows how that would have turned out.
without turnovers, the teams that lost to the griz would've won, for sure :roll:
Yeah, it's like saying "Well if Marshall had just covered Erhardt" or "If Captain Whats-His-Name wasn't hobbled for Furman"
Fumbles are either good plays by the defense or bad plays by the offense. Hypothetically dismissing them is preposterous. No different than dismissing TD passes, KO returns, etc. Every play can impact the outcome of the game. The Griz are 5-4 and there are no ifs, ands or buts about it.Paytonlives said:One word....
Fumbles
Without them Griz are 8-1 or 7-2
and the N. Dakota game started so crappy, who knows how that would have turned out.