Grizindabox like it or not I think he does have a shot. And I want to know what he did to leave a bad taste in peoples mouth? Seriously I want to know if him missing something on the guy. And actually there is quite a bit of difference between the two defenses. Paulson's defenses in five years gave up 17.1 points a game and with a record of 59-10. Gregorak's defenses in 3 years have given up 22.7 with a record of 24-13. I'm all about the facts. If this was a boxing match you ass would be on the mat. : )
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Why not Kraig Paulson as coach?
- Thread starter Oldgriz72
- Start date
mattxhub said:
We will see, but even though I am not a fan of Ty being the head coach, Ty has a much better shot at getting the job than does KP...which pretty much means KP has no shot because Ty will take it in a heartbeat if offered.
My last response, I wouldn't say Ty's got a much better chance. And I do agree that if Ty gets offered the job he will take it. But I seriously want to know what the bad taste in peoples mouths were? Like I said maybe the guy is a complete ass and I'm unaware of that. I've heard he's not but maybe my sources are wrong.
coyote said:
Okay, but what does make a good head coach? And what makes Paulson unqualified? To say that Ty has more of a chance than Paulson seems...I don't know, not quite right. I mean Ty was under Paulson and learned from him, the fact that he is succeeding now means that Paulson had to teach him something right? Which is what a (potentially) good head coach does?
mattxhub said:
All I will say is that others picked up quite a bit of the slack that was instrumental in the Griz defense having success when KP was the DC. Why do you think he was demoted or fired from other jobs? I think KP is a fine position coach, but this does and did not make him a great coordinator and will not make him a good head coach.
I lied it's not my last response. He got demoted at UNLV because talent wise they were bad. Their offense was bad as well therefore they were on the field a ton. And it doesn't help when he had to go against Geno Smith, Colin Kaepernick, Andy Dalton, Kellen Moore (winningest qb in cfb history), and superbowl winning QB Russell Wilson. 4 of the 5 are current starters in the NFL. That's why they were bad on defense.
Eh, I think that's a bit of a stretch. I mean, I don't doubt that Paulson didn't have help, and he was never one not to give credit.
That being said, when he was demoted/fired that was in an effort to save the head coaches butt, not a direct reflection on him, as its not like the team flourished under the DC's appointed after him.
That being said, when he was demoted/fired that was in an effort to save the head coaches butt, not a direct reflection on him, as its not like the team flourished under the DC's appointed after him.
Actually it is a reflection on him. He failed at both places as coordinator, and many of the reasons were the same reasons a number of people are sour on him from his UM days. All these excuses about poor talent, poor offense, and going against great OB's is crap. I thought good def coordinators....good coaches were supposed to find the talent necessary to stop other teams. Seems like a fail on all counts. It sounds to me like people making a ton of excuses for a guy that did not succeed.
I am not a big fan of Breske as a head coach, but his background and KP's background are quite different.
