• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Who's your pick for QB?

PlayerRep said:
BG was 6th in the nation for passing yards per game, and 20th for passing efficiency.

I am sure power rankings and strength of schedule had nothing to do with that? What would the numbers have looked like if the BSC had more that two teams in the top 20? CAA and MVC level of competition? Stats can be twisted ten ways until Sunday. Throwing arbitrary numbers out mean Sh$t. Hell the backup quarterback even broke records against ISU if I remember correctly. He probably would have eclipsed BG's numbers using a selective stats logic.
 
Copper Griz said:
PlayerRep said:
BG was 6th in the nation for passing yards per game, and 20th for passing efficiency.

I am sure power rankings and strength of schedule had nothing to do with that? What would the numbers have looked like if the BSC had more that two teams in the top 20? CAA and MVC level of competition? Stats can be twisted ten ways until Sunday. Throwing arbitrary numbers out mean Sh$t. Hell the backup quarterback even broke records against ISU if I remember correctly. He probably would have eclipsed BG's numbers using a selective stats logic.

With the qb's from Samford, Murry St and Morehead St ahead of BG, I assume BG's ranking would go up to no. 3 in passing yards per game. Similarly with passing efficiency. Next question.
 
PlayerRep said:
Copper Griz said:
PlayerRep said:
BG was 6th in the nation for passing yards per game, and 20th for passing efficiency.

I am sure power rankings and strength of schedule had nothing to do with that? What would the numbers have looked like if the BSC had more that two teams in the top 20? CAA and MVC level of competition? Stats can be twisted ten ways until Sunday. Throwing arbitrary numbers out mean Sh$t. Hell the backup quarterback even broke records against ISU if I remember correctly. He probably would have eclipsed BG's numbers using a selective stats logic.

With the qb's from Samford, Murry St and Morehead St ahead of BG, I assume BG's ranking would go up to no. 3 in passing yards per game. Similarly with passing efficiency. Next question.

Your points side steps the issue. What are those teams conferences? What was their final rank? What about their conferences strength of schedules. No conference games count for stats? The stats are largely irrelevant. You are trying to use cherry picked stats to bolster your weak argument. Most lawyers do. BG's ranking could be number 1. The comments about his performance and his performance post season with other seniors says more than your weak stats. Weak. Arguing with you is a waste of time. We will see in 2017.
 
JLM taking a bubble screen 80 yards to the house helps your AVERAGE yards per throw out pretty well. Says more about your receivers than the QB.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Copper Griz said:
PlayerRep said:
Copper Griz said:
PlayerRep said:
BG was 6th in the nation for passing yards per game, and 20th for passing efficiency.

I am sure power rankings and strength of schedule had nothing to do with that? What would the numbers have looked like if the BSC had more that two teams in the top 20? CAA and MVC level of competition? Stats can be twisted ten ways until Sunday. Throwing arbitrary numbers out mean Sh$t. Hell the backup quarterback even broke records against ISU if I remember correctly. He probably would have eclipsed BG's numbers using a selective stats logic.

With the qb's from Samford, Murry St and Morehead St ahead of BG, I assume BG's ranking would go up to no. 3 in passing yards per game. Similarly with passing efficiency. Next question.

Your points side steps the issue. What are those teams conferences? What was their final rank? What about their conferences strength of schedules. No conference games count for stats? The stats are largely irrelevant. You are trying to use cherry picked stats to bolster your weak argument. Most lawyers do. BG's ranking could be number 1. The comments about his performance and his performance post season with other seniors says more than your weak stats. Weak. Arguing with you is a waste of time. We will see in 2017.

I side stepped nothing. I took 2 important passing stats directly from the ncaa stats. They are what they are. You are welcome to provide your stats.

Copper, you are one of several posters on egriz that I have come to view as not having a clue about the game of football. You can't argue with me because you don't understand the game, and appear to have no game.
 
brewskis said:
JLM taking a bubble screen 80 yards to the house helps your AVERAGE yards per throw out pretty well. Says more about your receivers than the QB.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Brewskis, passing yards per game is exactly what it says. Take all the passing yards for the season for the qb, and divide by number of games played. It is what it is. By definition.

Yes, every passing play is counted. The passing yards at the end of the game, and at the end of the season, are what they are.

You babble about bubble screens is just plain dumb. Add, subtract. What are you talking about?

You, like Copper, and HHH, are truly the dumbest football posters on this board. You 3 post dumb football stuff almost every time you post. I don't know if I should keep laughing or feel sorry for you.
 
Doesn't the ncaa keep YAC (yards after catch) stat? A little extrapolation would get you the QB who truly "wings it around" vs the talents of runner.

Stats are lipstick. What shade do you want.
 
brewskis said:
JLM taking a bubble screen 80 yards to the house helps your AVERAGE yards per throw out pretty well. Says more about your receivers than the QB.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

and receivers dropping 5-6 balls a game hurts your AVERAGE yards per throw out too.

C'mon. You guys just hate BG. He had a great year and you all just hate that our Offense was one of the best we've seen in a while yet we still lost games because of the defense and a few games where we couldn't score. But everyone will blame the offense for not scoring and not the defense for allowing 40 ppg or whatever it was.
 
I wouldn't say Brady had a "great year". He did put up good numbers against the competition we were given (which most decent quarterbacks should do), but he was very inconsistent. Inconsistency really hurt BG when it came to better playing against better teams. One half would be hot and then the next would be ice cold. When a quarterback can only manage to lead his offense to two first downs in an entire half against the Bobcats, that's not a great job.
 
Eriul said:
brewskis said:
JLM taking a bubble screen 80 yards to the house helps your AVERAGE yards per throw out pretty well. Says more about your receivers than the QB.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

and receivers dropping 5-6 balls a game hurts your AVERAGE yards per throw out too.

C'mon. You guys just hate BG. He had a great year and you all just hate that our Offense was one of the best we've seen in a while yet we still lost games because of the defense and a few games where we couldn't score. But everyone will blame the offense for not scoring and not the defense for allowing 40 ppg or whatever it was.

No one hates BG but I wouldn't say he had a great year. Egiz people have a higher expectation of things because we have seen them fulfilled, all over the field, over time.
"our Offense was one of the best we've seen"---please put down the pipe
 
Imagine what BG's numbers could of been if he had even a semi reliable receiving corp??

Sent from my STV100-2 using Tapatalk

 
fanofzoo said:
Eriul said:
brewskis said:
JLM taking a bubble screen 80 yards to the house helps your AVERAGE yards per throw out pretty well. Says more about your receivers than the QB.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

and receivers dropping 5-6 balls a game hurts your AVERAGE yards per throw out too.

C'mon. You guys just hate BG. He had a great year and you all just hate that our Offense was one of the best we've seen in a while yet we still lost games because of the defense and a few games where we couldn't score. But everyone will blame the offense for not scoring and not the defense for allowing 40 ppg or whatever it was.

No one hates BG but I wouldn't say he had a great year. Egiz people have a higher expectation of things because we have seen them fulfilled, all over the field, over time.
"our Offense was one of the best we've seen"---please put down the pipe

Sorry what pipe? I'm speaking straight numbers. Last years offense was one of the best we've seen in recent history from a statistical standpoint in every single category but wins... now if you wanna blame 1 phase of the team for the losses be my guest but that's plain ignorance
 
Okay PR, you're right. And it's good to see that his postseason accolades support your stance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top