Where's Jordan Johnson?

[statler & waldorf]

Just list ten of your eGriz buddies and its over. Really. :lol:

 

[MrTitleist]

So did we ever find Jordan Johnson or not?

Please lock this thread and spare them the embarrassment

Sorry, just a stupid mod. Don't know how to lock threads.

 

[Bisonation]

Glad you ass wipes had so much fun with this thread. I am 66 years old, and my fighting days are long over. But I do carry, as I have for over 30 years, and if I had shown up and that ass clown started his B.S. with me, I am afraid that I would not have been able to resist. I don't want to go to jail, so I did not show. If he is bent on stalking me, as he seems to be about everyone who is on to his game (ask Alpha), then he may yet get his chance.

It would only get violent if PR got the best of you in a debate? What a f***[*] tool! You're a poster boy for why concealed weapon laws should be tightened. I don't believe the mentally ill should be given access to firearms. Too afraid to be beaten down by thought and reason. Or you can't control your petty emotions so you would shoot someone? WTF? You're a piece of shit. PR showed who the better man is.

BEST THING URSA HAS EVER WRITTEN. BRAVO

This is a great thread, I'm so glad Brock Jensen beat JJ out so we could witness this epic meltdown

 

[BWahlberg]

So did we ever find Jordan Johnson or not?

Steve might've shot him, he's packing heat you know.

 

[EverettGriz]

So did we ever find Jordan Johnson or not?

Steve might've shot him, he's packing heat you know.

So, you're saying it was Mr. Pickle, on the Davenport, with the gun?

 

[BWahlberg]

So did we ever find Jordan Johnson or not?

Steve might've shot him, he's packing heat you know.

So, you're saying it was Mr. Pickle, on the Davenport, with the gun?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[MrTitleist]

So did we ever find Jordan Johnson or not?

Steve might've shot him, he's packing heat you know.

So, you're saying it was Mr. Pickle, on the Davenport, with the gun?

The Davenport? I thought it was Mr. Davenport!

 

[Ursa Major]

So did we ever find Jordan Johnson or not?

Steve might've shot him, he's packing heat you know.

So, you're saying it was Mr. Pickle, on the Davenport, with the gun?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Well done!!!

 

[CDAGRIZ]

So did we ever find Jordan Johnson or not?

Steve might've shot him, he's packing heat you know.

So, you're saying it was Mr. Pickle, on the Davenport, with the gun?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

This belongs in the hall of fame. I'm very humbled, and very proud, EG. This was one hell of a post.

 

[grizindabox]

I just heard...AtlGrz would have listed his 10 egriz buddies, but he had to go shopping with his wife...he has receipts to prove it

 

[UMGriz75]

A California judge has ruled that a "hearing," much like the one imposed and conducted by UM"s Dean of Kangaroos on Jordan Johnson, represented a fundamental denial of "due process."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/due-process-win-california-judge-rules-campus-kangaroo-court-unfair/article/2568180

 

[CV Griz Fan]

A California judge has ruled that a "hearing," much like the one imposed and conducted by UM"s Dean of Kangaroos on Jordan Johnson, represented a fundamental denial of "due process."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/due-process-win-california-judge-rules-campus-kangaroo-court-unfair/article/2568180

Constitutional rights eventually trump everything else. The UC San Diego case was even stranger than JJ's. This case included a consensual sexual encounter after heavy drinking to start off, rebuffed sexual advances the second day, a brief few week relationship between the two students and finally a sexual misconduct charge by the female student.

 

[UMGriz75]

A California judge has ruled that a "hearing," much like the one imposed and conducted by UM"s Dean of Kangaroos on Jordan Johnson, represented a fundamental denial of "due process."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/due-process-win-california-judge-rules-campus-kangaroo-court-unfair/article/2568180

Constitutional rights eventually trump everything else. The UC San Diego case was even stranger than JJ's. This case included a consensual sexual encounter after heavy drinking to start off, rebuffed sexual advances the second day, a brief few week relationship between the two students and finally a sexual misconduct charge by the female student.

The "Mattress Girl" case is nearly identical. JJ's, not so much different. The Fabulist had been pursuing a relationship. JJ's visiting girlfriend seems to have "set off" a reaction. Going from "I'd do you anytime Jordy," explicitly in front of said girlfriend, to "doing him" the next day and then when the "do" turned into a somewhat unsatisfying lack of commitment, to "something else."

What was interesting during setting up UM's prevention program was running across a study that showed that a very high percentage (I can't recall it specifically at the moment, it may have been as high as 90%) of charged rapes were brought by women who had charged or alleged prior rapes. That is exactly the opposite of what I would have expected.

Female students, who are far more cynical in general about such claims than men, offered an explanation that was quite disconcerting especially when it comes to popular athletes. "Consent has two different meanings to women." This statement is coming from a woman. "I consented to having sex with someone that I believed wanted to enter into a relationship. I did not consent to having sex with someone who just wanted sex."

Well, there it is then. "Consent" is a social construct dependent on what happened "afterward," not during. The San Diego case and Mattress Girl are representative of precisely that social construct. It is real.

And therein lies that "time period" of some duration -- ranging from seconds to weeks to months -- when "motive" is examined in terms of the post-coital behavior of the athlete/student/guy/rock star/Frat boy, whomever. Given that "guys want sex" and "girls want relationships," the connection between serial claims of rape and difficult cases has "some" basis in that context.

 

[fanofzoo]

Glad you ass wipes had so much fun with this thread. I am 66 years old, and my fighting days are long over. But I do carry, as I have for over 30 years, and if I had shown up and that ass clown started his B.S. with me, I am afraid that I would not have been able to resist. I don't want to go to jail, so I did not show. If he is bent on stalking me, as he seems to be about everyone who is on to his game (ask Alpha), then he may yet get his chance.

It would only get violent if PR got the best of you in a debate? What a f***[*] tool! You're a poster boy for why concealed weapon laws should be tightened. I don't believe the mentally ill should be given access to firearms. Too afraid to be beaten down by thought and reason. Or you can't control your petty emotions so you would shoot someone? WTF? You're a piece of shit. PR showed who the better man is.

BEST THING URSA HAS EVER WRITTEN. BRAVO

This is a great thread, I'm so glad Brock Jensen beat JJ out so we could witness this epic meltdown

Yeah brock 3rd or 4th string qb on a cfl team, thats something to be proud of. Jordy didnt like the situation up there and came back to start a career. Poor brock, living a minimum wage job. I don't think he can count as high as Jordy's IQ

 

[CV Griz Fan]

A California judge has ruled that a "hearing," much like the one imposed and conducted by UM"s Dean of Kangaroos on Jordan Johnson, represented a fundamental denial of "due process."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/due-process-win-california-judge-rules-campus-kangaroo-court-unfair/article/2568180

Constitutional rights eventually trump everything else. The UC San Diego case was even stranger than JJ's. This case included a consensual sexual encounter after heavy drinking to start off, rebuffed sexual advances the second day, a brief few week relationship between the two students and finally a sexual misconduct charge by the female student.

The "Mattress Girl" case is nearly identical. JJ's, not so much different. The Fabulist had been pursuing a relationship. JJ's visiting girlfriend seems to have "set off" a reaction. Going from "I'd do you anytime Jordy," explicitly in front of said girlfriend, to "doing him" the next day and then when the "do" turned into a somewhat unsatisfying lack of commitment, to "something else."

What was interesting during setting up UM's prevention program was running across a study that showed that a very high percentage (I can't recall it specifically at the moment, it may have been as high as 90%) of charged rapes were brought by women who had charged or alleged prior rapes. That is exactly the opposite of what I would have expected.

Female students, who are far more cynical in general about such claims than men, offered an explanation that was quite disconcerting especially when it comes to popular athletes. "Consent has two different meanings to women." This statement is coming from a woman. "I consented to having sex with someone that I believed wanted to enter into a relationship. I did not consent to having sex with someone who just wanted sex."

Well, there it is then. "Consent" is a social construct dependent on what happened "afterward," not during. The San Diego case and Mattress Girl are representative of precisely that social construct. It is real.

And therein lies that "time period" of some duration -- ranging from seconds to weeks to months -- when "motive" is examined in terms of the post-coital behavior of the athlete/student/guy/rock star/Frat boy, whomever. Given that "guys want sex" and "girls want relationships," the connection between serial claims of rape and difficult cases has "some" basis in that context.

A possible bigger issue is Universities punishing the charged students. Not to rehash JJ's case or any other college sexual misconduct case but the guy at UC San Diego was basically "expelled" from school for five quarters(terms). The administration had rendered a decision and the male student sued in court. No rape charge was ever filed. The school acted unilaterally. That is wild....