this has been discussed before but the other major factor is the overall evoulution of the athletes we see today in all sports. on the topic of basketball kids are simply bigger, stronger, more athletic, etc. i guess i can agree that fundamentals have suffered because of this. i just think in very general terms kids are getting a lot better and more and more kids are prepared for division one basketball. i don't think kids in montana have just magically gotten worse at hoops than kids 20 years ago. it's that 20 years ago you could get a few kids from montana and still be competitive in this conference. i just don't think that is the case anymore.
and before people go off on me. i'm aware that "your" generation is always going to be tougher, stronger, quicker, mentally tougher, etc. than "this" generation. that's why this argument never goes anywhere. and i am also aware that there are always exceptions to the rule. guys like ferch and sprinkle were good enough then and they were good enough now. but i can think of several athletes over the years from montana high schools that played for the cats and griz that i don't think would
get a scholarship today. well...maybe for the cats because we're not very good...
i think d1 hoops in general is as good as it's ever been. guys outside of the top 100 can still compete with the top 25 because the talent is spread out all over. mid and low majors can be competitive. and as someone mentioned naia hoops has really gotten better even in the last 10+ years. and i think in many cases these in-state players are choosing to play significant minutes at carroll, western, northern, tech, etc. rather than play for the cats or griz like they would have in the 90's.
:twocents: