• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

What could have been? Evaluating all the turnover...

CleanHOUSE

Well-known member
I would like to see a break down of our incoming players this year vs all the guys who chose not to comeback/transfer and or who committed and backed out/didn't work out. It would be interesting to see how the incoming guys stack up against all they guys we could have had. Or to put it another way if you could pick from all they guys that could have been Griz this year, how do the 5 we actually got stack up. Unfortunately I don't have all the info to make this list, but I'll list some and maybe someone can do a more formal full list.
This is rough list let me know if I missed anything or have anything wrong.

COULD HAVE BEEN PLAYERS
1. Donavan Dorsey 6'7 F [chose to move on from basketball]
2. Ben Carter 6'11 C [Transfer to ?]
3. Kelby Kramer 6'11 C [Transfer to Minn St.]
4. Tony Miller 6'8 F [From Seattle Pacific transfer to Wazzu]
5. Jack Williams 6'8 F [From Pacific decommit to Rice]]
6. Lafayette Dorsey 6'1 G [From Pacific decommit to ?]
7. Jashire Hardnett 6'0 G [From BYU didn't work out to UMKC]
WHAT WE GOT
1. Hollinger 6'5 G
2. Vazquez 6'3 G
3. Kyle Owens 6'8 F
4. Jett Bricino 6'3 G
7. Naseem Gaskins 6'3 G [From Utah]
5. Michael Steadman 6'10 F [From San Jose St.]
6. Jerad Samualson 6' 7 F [From Rocky Mtn]
PLAYERS LOST TO GRADUATION
1. Rorie
2. Oguine
3. Moorhead
4. Akoh

From what I see we recruited enough Frosh guards. From a team comp standpoint looking at this list the only two guys I'm sad we missed out on were Jack Williams and Tony Miller. Williams, Miller, Cater, Kramer vs Samuelson, Steadman, and Owens?
 
CleanHOUSE said:
I would like to see a break down of our incoming players this year vs all the guys who chose not to comeback/transfer and or who committed and backed out/didn't work out. It would be interesting to see how the incoming guys stack up against all they guys we could have had. Or to put it another way if you could pick from all they guys that could have been Griz this year, how do the 5 we actually got stack up. Unfortunately I don't have all the info to make this list, but I'll list some and maybe someone can do a more formal full list.
This is rough list let me know if I missed anything or have anything wrong.

COULD HAVE BEEN PLAYERS
1. Donavan Dorsey 6'7 F [chose not to return]
2. Ben Carter 6'11 C [Transfer to ?]
3. Kelby Kramer 6'11 C [Transfer to ?]
4. Tony Miller 6'8 F [From Seattle Pacific transfer to Waszu]
5. Jack Williams 6'8 F [From Pacific decommit to Rice]
6. Rollie Worster 6'3 G [Decommit to Utah St.]
7. Lafayette Dorsey 6'1 G [From Pacific decommit to ?]
8. Jashire Hardnett 6'0 G [From BYU didn't work out to UMKC]
WHAT WE GOT
1. Hollinger 6'5 G
2. Vazquez 6'3 G
3. Kyle Owens 6'8 F
4. Jett Bricino 6'3 G
7. Naseem Gaskins 6'3 G [From Utah]
5. Michael Steadman 6'10 F [From San Jose St.]
6. Jerad Samualson 6' 7 F [From Rocky Mtn]
PLAYERS LOST TO GRADUATION
1. Rorie
2. Oguine
3. Moorhead
4. Akoh

From what I see we recruited enough Frosh guards. From a team comp standpoint looking at this list the only two guys im sad we missed out on were Jack Williams and Tony Miller. Williams, Miller, Cater, Kramer vs Samuelson, Steadman, and Owens?

Pretty sure Dorsey was a medical retirement. Kramer ended up at Minnesota State, Carter hasn't landed anywhere yet per VC.

You left out Yagi Selchuk who isn't eligible to compete until December.

If Steadman were eligible this year, I'd say that we didn't lose any ground. As it is, with Gaskins a ? re immediate eligibility, I think we take a bit of a step back this year. Assuming everyone stays healthy and Samuelson and Yagi can make significant contributions, we'll be very competitive come the BSC tourney.

Next year, with Steadman on the court, we'll be difficult to beat.

:thumb:
 
That list shows me we are light years ahead of what could have been. That turnover is good for those that left and great for us. I really like who we have. And you need to think beyond next year.

If you include Rollie, you need to include the four verbals we have for next year. We didn’t lose ground there, and I think it is healthy for Rollie to leave Missoula and strike some distance away on his own.
 
One name jumps out at me from the "Could Have Been" list: Tony Miller. He would have been a nice bridge between the veteran team of last year and the Fab Five of this. As to the rest? Sayanora!

But one word comes to mind when I look at the "What We Got" list: Upside! The Sky is not the limit with the this bunch. They could put us on the national map.
 
astutegriz said:
That list shows me we are light years ahead of what could have been. That turnover is good for those that left and great for us. I really like who we have. And you need to think beyond next year.

If you include Rollie, you need to include the four verbals we have for next year. We didn’t lose ground there, and I think it is healthy for Rollie to leave Missoula and strike some distance away on his own.

Oops Ill take Rollie off, I was thinking he would have come in this year. Yeah I think we had some addition by subtraction although maybe I am alone but I thought Carter had a bit of potential he had legit size and was fatletic and move a lot less awkwardly than Kramer.
 
citay said:
One name jumps out at me from the "Could Have Been" list: Tony Miller. He would have been a nice bridge between the veteran team of last year and the Fab Five of this. As to the rest? Sayanora!

But one word comes to mind when I look at the "What We Got" list: Upside! The Sky is not the limit with the this bunch. They could put us on the national map.

Yeah I tend to agree, what we got sets us up best for maybe the year after next, but of I think we are set up well for next year as well. I think we actually got the best possible group of players except I think the optimal situation would have been to get either Tony Miller or Jack Williams instead of Jett Brincino...maybe a few to many guards and more depth at C/F position would have been best.
 
CleanHOUSE said:
citay said:
One name jumps out at me from the "Could Have Been" list: Tony Miller. He would have been a nice bridge between the veteran team of last year and the Fab Five of this. As to the rest? Sayanora!

But one word comes to mind when I look at the "What We Got" list: Upside! The Sky is not the limit with the this bunch. They could put us on the national map.

Yeah I tend to agree, what we got sets us up best for maybe the year after next, but of I think we are set up well for next year as well. I think we actually got the best possible group of players except I think the optimal situation would have been to get either Tony Miller or Jack Williams instead of Jett Brincino...maybe a few to many guards and more depth at C/F position would have been best.
Isn't Jett a walk on?
 
Back
Top