beastie said:
I am not sure you get the difference. This team doesn't seem like it is poorly coached, it seems like at times they just can't execute. Come up with a free throw, get a rebound, close out a ballhandler. Those are execution things not coaching.
What are you talking about? You are saying execution is not related to coaching?
Execution is coaching!!! It's like preparing for a test, if you've studied you'll do well.
We have not been able to execute...poor coaching, admit it.
You, sir, are wrong. Execution is equivalent to taking the test. The teacher is equivalent to the coach. Practice is equivalent to studying for the test. Successful execution of basketball game is equivalent to passing the test. How a player practices (studies) is really up to the player not the coach (teacher). if all coaches (teachers) did a great job, then every player (student) would execute to success (pass the test with an A) everytime. Now, conversely, if all coaches(teachers) did a lousy job, then every player (student) would execute with failure (fail the test) everytime. Of course, that never happens, as there are always some student who fails no matter how good the teacher is. Same for how good a coach is, there will always be a player who doesn't follow what the coaches tell them no matter how good the coach is. During the game (test) it is up to the players (student) to execute (pass the test) based on what the coach (teacher) taught them.
Practice (studying) is really up to the player and not the coach, although, the coach (teacher) can certainly assist the player (student), but it is still ultimately the players (students) responsibility.
The best teams have more players that are following what the coaches say and/or are more capable of it (that would also go with students with following a teacher's lesson plan).
There are so many factors in determining who (coach or teacher) or the players(students). There is also parts that a coach (teacher) cannot control that only the player can (e.g. players mentality, moods, etc).
As for the Griz, Tinkle is still learning, so cannot call him a great coach yet. Also, there are some players that are just not following what the coaches are teaching them. IMO, I think the players mood is affecting the players to a degree, that it may not be a matter how good the coach is. It has been discussed many times of the loss of key players in positions that Griz are having trouble with like the 3. Coach has no control over that.
So, in my opinion, it is a combination of an inexperienced coach but still learning and getting better, and players that are not executing because of either lack of ability, bad moods from losing by only 1 or 2 points so often.
But, it appears beastie has been laying all the blame on Tinkle. that is so wrong. Especially, putting blame on Tinkle when it is the players fault. I think maybe Beastie better wait a couple more years before he starts blaming the coach. By, then, Tinkle will be coaching players with better capability and he will also be more experienced in being a head coach. Sure was nice to have Krysko for a couple years (even though his recruiting may have been a bit suspect), but he did have some parts that Tinkle never had. Tinkle will have more players with better capability to work with next couple years. Just wait. It will get better.
Just layoff tinkle because you do not know what you say.