• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Waiting at GSA office...

3-7-77 said:
CDAGRIZ said:
As resident judge I hereby enter a JNOV in favor of garizzalies and against Dill. Dill lost the bet, and, at the time of hearing, has not appeared to have paid.

This is a final judgment, and is not appealable.

It is so f###[#] ordered.

Objection, your honor, for a JNOV to be proper, the party must make a motion seeking that relief. Garizz has not made such a motion.
This case ended in a hung jury, so no winner or loser, therefore a JNOV is inappropriate. A new trial is indicated.

-- 3-7-77, Dokter of Law Wiki School of Law, 2021. :thumb:

The Court read garizzalies’ post in response to your “finding” as such motion, and has such authority to do so. I hold pro per litigants to the same standard as represented parties, but as a kind judge, I will give them a break on procedural issues from time to time. If you have an issue with the judgment, you are free to seek relief from the appellate court, but I guarantee you will be denied review very swiftly.

The Court will not consider further post-judgment motions.
 
AZGrizFan said:
f###[#] looney tunes around here…

Right, and I am looking forward to seeing you return to talking football again. You were diverted by progesterone-laced pedestrian posters.
 
How dare you show your maggot-y face around here? You are a low-down, dirty SOB with the spine of a jelly fish; always looking for a back door to run through. Lower than a snake’s belly in a vim-filled wagon rut.

You’re not a man, you’re a pusillanimous school girl. A mooching quandong, who lives under the foot-bride—a literal troll.

Calling you a “welch” is a slap in the face of anyone from Wales.

Your word is as reliable and dependable as a popcorn fart.

The biggest chiseling, scamming, defrauding, gouging, swindling grifter to troll the interwebs.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
3-7-77 said:
Objection, your honor, for a JNOV to be proper, the party must make a motion seeking that relief. Garizz has not made such a motion.
This case ended in a hung jury, so no winner or loser, therefore a JNOV is inappropriate. A new trial is indicated.

-- 3-7-77, Dokter of Law Wiki School of Law, 2021. :thumb:

The Court read garizzalies’ post in response to your “finding” as such motion, and has such authority to do so. I hold pro per litigants to the same standard as represented parties, but as a kind judge, I will give them a break on procedural issues from time to time. If you have an issue with the judgment, you are free to seek relief from the appellate court, but I guarantee you will be denied review very swiftly.

The Court will not consider further post-judgment motions.
May it please the Court.
Your honor, as liability has been established I would like to move on to the sentencing phase.
Since this judgement-proof dead-beat will never pay up, I am open to suggestions from any/all to recoup my pound of flesh.

As one condition of the losing party’s parole, may I recommend that instead of using words like “welcher” or “swindler” we now call them a “Diller”. For instance, whenever someone fails to recover their bet, we can say they “got Dilled”.

Of course, this is just a start and only a drop in the bucket to the amount owed, and I would invite the Court and even the gallery to add proposed punishments.
 
garizzalies said:
retiredpopo said:
what was the actual original bet? Were the stipulations changed after the bet?

Duckhunt offered to bet a $500 donation to the GSA to name any other screen name that was his. I accepted, and proved there are at least 8 other names.

He tried to add terms after I accepted but I never “stipulated” to any of that crap. Like a snake, he tried to wriggle out, but I would not release him and demanded specific performance.

However, I did give him a reasonable amount of time (4 days) to avoid the bet if he could get a moderator to prove otherwise. If not, we would meet at the GSA office for his donation to be made TODAY in cash.

There has been no response from the mods, nor him, and here I sit at the previously agreed upon venue, on the correct date, patiently waiting his arrival.

With his latest responses on this board....Im going to assume covid got him.
 
BadlandsGrizFan said:
garizzalies said:
Duckhunt offered to bet a $500 donation to the GSA to name any other screen name that was his. I accepted, and proved there are at least 8 other names.

He tried to add terms after I accepted but I never “stipulated” to any of that crap. Like a snake, he tried to wriggle out, but I would not release him and demanded specific performance.

However, I did give him a reasonable amount of time (4 days) to avoid the bet if he could get a moderator to prove otherwise. If not, we would meet at the GSA office for his donation to be made TODAY in cash.

There has been no response from the mods, nor him, and here I sit at the previously agreed upon venue, on the correct date, patiently waiting his arrival.

With his latest responses on this board....Im going to assume covid got him.

No, only woke snowflakes like you worry about covid.
 
3-7-77 said:
That's more like it, garizz! Lemons to lemonade. :thumb:

I knew he wouldn't pay. It's not my job to prove that I only post under hunt-ducks. Just humor him. He ain't the sharpest knife in the drawer. Actually, he's the poster child for natural de-selection. I enjoy continuing to live in his feeble mind, rent-free. He couldn't come up with the $500 anyway, unless he took a third mortgage on his double-wide, or hocked his 2000 Aerostar.
 
Diller
Dil•ler
/ˈdilər/

noun
1.
a person who will never pay a debt; someone who will do anything to avoid repaying a wager.
"Don’t bet that diller—he will never pay up.”

2.
a dishonest person who lies or lacks integrity; someone who runs out the back door.
“Kids, don’t feed the diller.”

verb
to cheat or get cheated.
“He will diller every dollar”.

Similar words: welcher, swindler, chiseler

Related words: dill-hole, dill-weed.
 
There's a lot of people chirping about the aliases of hunts/Dill ...

Eight is the number being bandied around, right? ...

Let's hear all eight of the so called banned user names... In the words of LeBron James "not 2 or 3 or 4" ... But all eight....
 
Cowboys84 said:
There's a lot of people chirping about the aliases of hunts/Dill ...

Eight is the number being bandied around, right? ...

Let's hear all eight of the so called banned user names... In the words of LeBron James "not 2 or 3 or 4" ... But all eight....

Don't you mean band? :D
 
MikeyGriz said:
Cowboys84 said:
There's a lot of people chirping about the aliases of hunts/Dill ...

Eight is the number being bandied around, right? ...

Let's hear all eight of the so called banned user names... In the words of LeBron James "not 2 or 3 or 4" ... But all eight....

Don't you mean band? :D

He ain’t from around here.
 
garizzalies said:
CDAGRIZ said:
The Court read garizzalies’ post in response to your “finding” as such motion, and has such authority to do so. I hold pro per litigants to the same standard as represented parties, but as a kind judge, I will give them a break on procedural issues from time to time. If you have an issue with the judgment, you are free to seek relief from the appellate court, but I guarantee you will be denied review very swiftly.

The Court will not consider further post-judgment motions.
May it please the Court.
Your honor, as liability has been established I would like to move on to the sentencing phase.
Since this judgement-proof dead-beat will never pay up, I am open to suggestions from any/all to recoup my pound of flesh.

As one condition of the losing party’s parole, may I recommend that instead of using words like “welcher” or “swindler” we now call them a “Diller”. For instance, whenever someone fails to recover their bet, we can say they “got Dilled”.

Of course, this is just a start and only a drop in the bucket to the amount owed, and I would invite the Court and even the gallery to add proposed punishments.

Because eGriztopia is a sovereign nation, we are not above debtor’s prison and/or exile for willful evasion of debts. The matter will be referred to our DA in the morning.
 
garizzalies said:
How dare you show your maggot-y face around here? You are a low-down, dirty SOB with the spine of a jelly fish; always looking for a back door to run through. Lower than a snake’s belly in a vim-filled wagon rut.

You’re not a man, you’re a pusillanimous school girl. A mooching quandong, who lives under the foot-bride—a literal troll.

Calling you a “welch” is a slap in the face of anyone from Wales.

Your word is as reliable and dependable as a popcorn fart.

The biggest chiseling, scamming, defrauding, gouging, swindling grifter to troll the interwebs.


I hear you take it bending over better than on all fours. Double-up on your Paxil, and get out the KY
 
C'mon people still waiting on all of those 8 band user names...

I know the usual culprits are lurking out there..... let's hear them

So far all I hear is Crickett's...
 
Back
Top