• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Vigen's Next Stop

The two current MWC openings are Utah State and Fresno State. The new Utah State AD only hires people with Ohio State ties so he will likely get passed over for that job. Fresno State though is interesting. He could have a shot at that one, and I think that's one of the more attractive jobs in the league. There's bound to be more that open up though.
Apparently the rumors are USU is going to target Weber States old HC and now BYU Defensive Coordinator Jay Hill.
 
I'm gonna stop you right there. While PR says some crazy shit sometimes, he is right on this one. As someone who follows FBS recruiting very closely, not all "84" rated prospects are the same. A QB who is an 84 that plays in the Trinity League in California is a much different prospect than someone who plays QB at Bozeman High. Kids get these rating by people who attend their games and observe their play at camps, and I'm here to tell you that not many recruiting scouts are coming to games in Montana. They see 6-6 220, watch his highlight tape and assess a rating. Look, maybe he turns out to be a good player, maybe even a great one, but the fact he has zero FBS interest is very telling. You can tell a lot about a prospect based on who is offering them a scholarship, and his is not impressive from the standpoint of being an FBS caliber player.

Prep athletes are very hard to evaluate in Montana unless they are getting out and going to camps (which I'm sure he's done some of) where they are competing against more consistent and higher rated competition, because the what they see in the state of Montana overall is not great. Doesn't mean there are not outliers, they are just hard to find and evaluate.

I've been trying and failing to make this point for several years. You've made it very well. To add to the bolded, I think the ones who watch the highlights and assign ratings could be so used to doing so for players playing against tougher competition that they might not realize just how big of a delta there is when they rate MT prospects. Put another way, I think they know there's a talent difference overall, but I'm sometimes not so sure they realize that many of the defensive players they see in a MT QB's highlight tape might struggle to make JV in the Trinity League.
 
Wait what? People who understand the game and played at a high level (like me) know this isn't true. Grant Vigen carries an 84 rating from 247Sports. As a point of reference here are some of the commitments of other kids with an 84 rating in the same class:
Syracuse, SHSU, Marshall, Maryland, Utah St, Fresno St, San Jose St, Bowling Green, and a few others.

Do better PR. You continue to muck this place up with garbage posts.
This is the same 247 sports that gave Grant the same number of stars as Matt Ludwig who has offers from every major college team in the country.
 
I've been trying and failing to make this point for several years. You've made it very well. To add to the bolded, I think the ones who watch the highlights and assign ratings could be so used to doing so for players playing against tougher competition that they might not realize just how big of a delta there is when they rate MT prospects. Put another way, I think they know there's a talent difference overall, but I'm sometimes not so sure they realize that many of the defensive players they see in a MT QB's highlight tape might struggle to make JV in the Trinity League.
This conversation is why I have always harped UM not being afraid to dip into west coast recruiting hot beds with a high frequency. Don't get me wrong, O love have a roster full of local guys, but if we want to take a step up in talent, the logical thing to do is try and pull players for talent rich areas. Your not going to get the top end guys, but even low level guys in say, Texas, are competing against high level competition, much more so than that of Montana, or even Washington and Oregon. Good players fall through the cracks in those places at a pretty high frequency. Think of a guy like Cam Ward winding up at Incarnate Word. I'm not advocating for a roster that is 2/3 Montana guys, I just think to be uber competitive in todays FCS landscape, you have to get athletes and big bodies from places with high level high school competition.
 
This conversation is why I have always harped UM not being afraid to dip into west coast recruiting hot beds with a high frequency. Don't get me wrong, O love have a roster full of local guys, but if we want to take a step up in talent, the logical thing to do is try and pull players for talent rich areas. Your not going to get the top end guys, but even low level guys in say, Texas, are competing against high level competition, much more so than that of Montana, or even Washington and Oregon. Good players fall through the cracks in those places at a pretty high frequency. Think of a guy like Cam Ward winding up at Incarnate Word. I'm not advocating for a roster that is 2/3 Montana guys, I just think to be uber competitive in todays FCS landscape, you have to get athletes and big bodies from places with high level high school competition.
Agree with every word, and Cam Ward is a perfect example that supports the "farm system" approach to recruiting. Get them on the way up instead of the way down after they tried and failed to make an impact at the FBS level. This is especially true now that a players can transfer FBS-->FBS with impunity if they're good enough. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a good portion of our really good FBS/I-A transfers came pre-portal so they could avoid sitting out if they stayed at the higher level.

As I've mentioned before, this would require a wholesale change in recruiting strategy. But, on average, let MSU have 15 of the top 25 MT recruits every year so they feel good about the "in-state recruiting battle". We'll take 15 of the top 300 from CA and/or TX every year and see how things shake out.
 
So... Here is my thought as someone who called all the home games for Gallatin the last 5 years on the radio. Grant Vigen is the 2nd best pure QB I have seen in that time. 1st being Presley out of Glacier (Junior this year). #3 being Huot that is at UM.

Pro's
Grant can hit every throw there is. He gets rid of the ball quick, and is accurate. He can move in the pocket very well, and is very good at reading defenses on what they are giving him. This is a trait that very few QB's at a Montana High School level have.

Con's
He isn't going to run the ball, so if you can force him out of the pocket towards the short side of the field, he will throw it away rather than run it. He is very tall, but very thin. This will improve when you get the college level lifting and eating.

Overall
I have no idea how he will play in College, nobody does with most recruits. I will say that he could play at the FBS level because of his height and his arm strength and arm talent.
That is fair. I talked to a veteran official that worked a few of his games and he was very impressed.
 
There are two schools in Bozeman. Gallatin High and Bozeman High.
I was intending to distinguish from the Bozeman high qb, Gatorade player of year, as opposed to the big Bozeman high receiver who is now a TE at MSU. About a dozen of my relatives including myself played at Bozeman high.
 
Last edited:
I was talking about the Bozeman high qb, Gatorade player of year, as opposed to the big Bozeman high receiver who is now a TE at MSU. About a dozen of my relatives including myself played at Bozeman high.
Cool story. So did I and my younger Brother... The Bozeman High QB from last year (2023) is playing B-Ball at Carrol. The WR from Bozeman High last year (2023) is indeed a TE at MSU. The latest Gallatin High kid (Springman) is a preferred walk-on for Cats, and should play LB, but we will see.
 
This conversation is why I have always harped UM not being afraid to dip into west coast recruiting hot beds with a high frequency. Don't get me wrong, O love have a roster full of local guys, but if we want to take a step up in talent, the logical thing to do is try and pull players for talent rich areas. Your not going to get the top end guys, but even low level guys in say, Texas, are competing against high level competition, much more so than that of Montana, or even Washington and Oregon. Good players fall through the cracks in those places at a pretty high frequency. Think of a guy like Cam Ward winding up at Incarnate Word. I'm not advocating for a roster that is 2/3 Montana guys, I just think to be uber competitive in todays FCS landscape, you have to get athletes and big bodies from places with high level high school competition.
To be fair, Cam Ward didn’t get recruited because he didn’t throw the ball in HS. Quite an outlier.
 
Cool story. So did I and my younger Brother... The Bozeman High QB from last year (2023) is playing B-Ball at Carrol. The WR from Bozeman High last year (2023) is indeed a TE at MSU. The latest Gallatin High kid (Springman) is a preferred walk-on for Cats, and should play LB, but we will see.
A lot of HS QBs if they are 6’3 plus end up being TE’s in college. Under 6’3 QBs safeties and receivers. They play QB in high school because they are often the best athletes on the team. It would interesting study to see how many NFL players played QB in high school.
 
Agree with every word, and Cam Ward is a perfect example that supports the "farm system" approach to recruiting. Get them on the way up instead of the way down after they tried and failed to make an impact at the FBS level. This is especially true now that a players can transfer FBS-->FBS with impunity if they're good enough. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a good portion of our really good FBS/I-A transfers came pre-portal so they could avoid sitting out if they stayed at the higher level.

As I've mentioned before, this would require a wholesale change in recruiting strategy. But, on average, let MSU have 15 of the top 25 MT recruits every year so they feel good about the "in-state recruiting battle". We'll take 15 of the top 300 from CA and/or TX every year and see how things shake out.
That's been tried again and again. The team that wins the in state recruiting battle pretty much always is the better team. Most of UM and MSU's best players have been in state and many are walk-ons. There is a huge difference between players that really want to be here and players who come here because they don't have a better option elsewhere.
 
Agree with every word, and Cam Ward is a perfect example that supports the "farm system" approach to recruiting. Get them on the way up instead of the way down after they tried and failed to make an impact at the FBS level. This is especially true now that a players can transfer FBS-->FBS with impunity if they're good enough. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a good portion of our really good FBS/I-A transfers came pre-portal so they could avoid sitting out if they stayed at the higher level.

As I've mentioned before, this would require a wholesale change in recruiting strategy. But, on average, let MSU have 15 of the top 25 MT recruits every year so they feel good about the "in-state recruiting battle". We'll take 15 of the top 300 from CA and/or TX every year and see how things shake out.
MSU has been doing very good in recruiting in Montana. Also, very good in Texas. They have had good success in WA, CA, OR. Making some inroads in MN recently.
 
That's been tried again and again. The team that wins the in state recruiting battle pretty much always is the better team. Most of UM and MSU's best players have been in state and many are walk-ons. There is a huge difference between players that really want to be here and players who come here because they don't have a better option elsewhere.
It really hasn't been tried, ever, to my knowledge. You're describing an out-of-state recruit who has to fall to Montana out of necessity. I'm describing a kid who has the opportunity to sit the bench at a Utah or Arizona (just examples) for three years or play early at Montana with the expectation/understanding that he'll be hitting the portal if he performs. Two different things.
 
It really hasn't been tried, ever, to my knowledge. You're describing an out-of-state recruit who has to fall to Montana out of necessity. I'm describing a kid who has the opportunity to sit the bench at a Utah or Arizona (just examples) for three years or play early at Montana with the expectation/understanding that he'll be hitting the portal if he performs. Two different things.
I 1000% agree with you. Here is the thing with that... Let's just use Bobby Hauch as an example. Do you thing he would use this as a recruiting tool? Many coaches will not (Take Dabo for example) they are all about the portal when it helps them out, but HATE IT and say it is ruining college sports when it goes the other way. I see Bobby as one of those coaches (In My Opinion). If an FCS coach can truly look at it the way you are talking, and recruit that way, they would dominate the FCS no matter what coach came in.
 
I 1000% agree with you. Here is the thing with that... Let's just use Bobby Hauch as an example. Do you thing he would use this as a recruiting tool? Many coaches will not (Take Dabo for example) they are all about the portal when it helps them out, but HATE IT and say it is ruining college sports when it goes the other way. I see Bobby as one of those coaches (In My Opinion). If an FCS coach can truly look at it the way you are talking, and recruit that way, they would dominate the FCS no matter what coach came in.
Bobby would never employ that strategy. We'd have to get a new coach before it was ever considered here.
 
It really hasn't been tried, ever, to my knowledge. You're describing an out-of-state recruit who has to fall to Montana out of necessity. I'm describing a kid who has the opportunity to sit the bench at a Utah or Arizona (just examples) for three years or play early at Montana with the expectation/understanding that he'll be hitting the portal if he performs. Two different things.
Oh I see. That really would be an interesting strategy. But do you really think you would find a lot of players that have the opportunity to go to the P5 right away to come to the FCS? Even if you told them you were cool with them moving up if the opportunity presents itself? Most 18yo are not prepared to step on the field at a place like UM even if they are FBS quality. Also the cats out of the bag, they know they can do this anyway. We are like JC was forever.
 
Every FCS program is a stepping stone school.
giphy.gif
 
That's been tried again and again. The team that wins the in state recruiting battle pretty much always is the better team. Most of UM and MSU's best players have been in state and many are walk-ons. There is a huge difference between players that really want to be here and players who come here because they don't have a better option elsewhere.

Not UM. It's a coaching geriatric unit.
 
Back
Top