Man, that's awful. I mean, 75,000 is seriously the average rating for the Weather Channel. More people want to know the dew point in Cottonwood Falls, KS than watch fcs football (or at least a bub game).174K viewers for FCS #1 v #2 in prime time. By comparison, kitties v spuds a week earlier on ESPN2 garnered 75K eyeballs
I think that game being past the east coasts bedtime hurt a lot.
Ya I won't sit here and say our ratings would have sky rocketed because we know they wouldn't have. But the Marker was 8pm eastern and our game was 10pm eastern. Certainly doesn't help.I think that game being past the east coasts bedtime hurt a lot.
Fair.Not sure that's the reason. Our game @ Idaho last year on ESPN2 didn't kick off until 8:30 PM MT (10:30 PM ET) - We had 241k watch that game.
But..but....we are so lucky to get to play for Championships! )Man, that's awful. I mean, 75,000 is seriously the average rating for the Weather Channel. More people want to know the dew point in Cottonwood Falls, KS than watch fcs football (or at least a bub game).
That is pretty good, where did you get numbers?All of our regular season games on ESPN2, we’ve averaged right around 250k.
Pronouns is a very difficult course at MSDUI.They're game was excellent.
Pronouns is a very difficult course at MSDUI.
Actually, it's very easy to make a comparison, as I did above: more people were watching the weather channel than this football game.The numbers vary widely depending on starting times and other games being played in the same time slot. Hard to make any type of comparison.