The Big 10 has publicly stated that it may not just take 1 team, but 3 (to 14) or even 5 (to 16). There are any number of media outlets reporting this, like the Chicago Sun-Times. Schools in the Big12 are under active consideration: including Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, and possibly Oklahoma. From the Big East, Rutgers or Syracuse add a lot more value than Pittsburgh would. Presumably, in order to attract Texas, the Big Ten would need to invite at least one other Big12 team, and possibly four more, in order to have a division in which Texas could maintain rivalries (e.g. Oklahoma) and decent travel (i.e. A west Big 10 division of the Big Ten with TX, OK, KS, MO, IA MN, WS, NW wouldn't be that much different than Big 12 travel.)Noles & Griz said:UNDfan said:With Texas talking with the Big 10, practically anything is possible.
With some of the conference changes lining up, it almost makes Montana's move to FBS inevitable.
Utah and Colorado to Pac10
Missouri, Texas, Syracuse to Big 10
BYU, TCU, Colorado St to Big 12
Boise St, Nevada, Fresno St, Hawaii to MWC
The WAC is left with: San Jose St, Idaho, N Mex St, Utah St
At a minimum, Montana, UCDavis, CalPoly, and Sac St join the WAC.
Montana would be a first-tier power in a new WAC. If Montana had joined a WAC with Boise St, Fresno, Hawaii, the Griz would have been in a second tier, making a move too risky.
UNDfan...with your scenario, you have the Big 10 expanding to 14 teams. That is not going to happen. I think the Big East will take a FCS team...Villanova. They are already Big East in every other sport. Here is how I see things shaking out. This scenario eliminates the Sun Belt, has 10 12-team conferences, with Notre Dame, Army, and Navy remaining independent.
- Pitt goes to the Big 10...logical fit geographically, academically, and athletically.
The Big 12 could theoretically lose 5 schools, which would end up descimating the MWC. Montana will almost certainly have an opportunity to rejoin Idaho and maybe even Nevada in an FBS league.