406grizfan4life said:PDXGrizzly said:Montana37 said:IdahoGrizFan said:If you ask me he should have started the 2nd half.
Exactly the lack of offense had gone on too long
Watching Sneed vs Humphrey, I can see Sneed was WAAAY too wound up. His short passes were a million miles an hour and his longer ones were just off the mark. He is quick to flush and has trouble hitting hot routes. He also doesn’t throw receivers open. Watching Humphrey, he doesn’t do any of that. His pocket presence is noticeably better than Sneed’s. He has more touch and throws his receivers open.
I don’t know... I’m seeing the downside of Sneed and it really isn’t pretty. I know he’s a gamer, but he shouldn’t get rattled and panicky as much as he does. I like his wheels, but he has no downfield ability. This let’s defenses key on the shorter passes and flood the quick routes. Humphrey gives the O the ability to stretch the field, making defenses pay for playing close to the line. He just seems to have more upside.
Agreed and spot on
Add that he never gets past his first read and he’s made up his mind who he’s throwing it to before the ball is even snapped, regardless of coverage.