I don't mind talk about uniforms, because I have many complaints about our current ones. What's the deal with all the colors? We debate the maroon/silver versus the original colors versus alternate colors ad infinitum. I'm here to say we don't need all these soft-nosed, weak-necked colors. If you look at photographs of any uniforms from the hardest-nosed teams in football history, you'll see that they all wore a combination of black, white, and different shades of sepia. No microfiber, no dri-fit, and the only wicking going on was down at Penhaligon's Candle Shop.
As we all know, around the late 1960s, more and more teams started getting spray fart soft. This coincided with the addition of colors to jerseys, helmets, and even socks. We can debate correlation versus causation, but you can see evidence of the color shift in period photographs. I don't think it's a coincidence.
Many of you may ask questions like, "How do you know players were tougher pre-1960-ish, when colors became more common on uniforms?" or "Do fundamental particles, including the graviton that carries the gravitational force, truly act like one-dimensional vibrating strings?" I know those players were tougher because if you look at historical data, a player from that era could play offensive line at a mere 185 lbs. Nowadays, those same players tip the scales at some 100 lbs.+ heavier. Clearly, a 185-lb player who can effectively block is much tougher than one who needs to weigh 100 pounds more to effectively block. Basic science.
In closing, all tough teams in history wore a nice black/white/sepia color scheme. So, by flawless logic, if we wear a nice black/white/sepia color scheme, we will be tough.