• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

UM No. 1 in Conference Scoring Defense and Red Zone Defense

ordigger said:
PlayerRep said:
ordigger said:
havgrizfan said:
When Heisman voters look at stats, they will NOT through Marcus Mariotta's stats against Nicholls State out. The won't throw Teddy Bridgewater's 18 first-half touchdowns in four blowout wins out. And when ESPN announces the All-American teams and puts stats next to their names, they won't be conference-only stats. Also, in the Buck Buchanen Award bio on TSN, they didn't make any mention of Caleb's stats in blowouts or non-conference games being thrown out. And they didn't list conference-only stats, they listed FCS stats. PERIOD.
Click to expand...

Actually they will....they will see how the candidates performed in the bigger games. You don't believe that Maziel's performance against Alabama last year garnished him many of those votes?

When HOF voters look to vote people, are they looking at how a player did in the minors? Of course not. Ichiro will probably be the first to get credit for his Japanese numbers when voted on for consideration, however his MLB numbers will be enough to get him in. True stats are how you do against your level.

And there is a difference between a "stat" and a "stat analysis".
Click to expand...

No, they won't. You have no clue how Heisman voters vote, or what they analyze.
Click to expand...

Actually I do.....do your really want to go there Mr I Stayed At a Holiday Inn Last Night? Remember last time you thought I didnt know somebody, who looked foolish then? Although I must admit this time its not a relative. Unlike you, I don't name drop, and strut over the fact that I may know this person or that person.
Click to expand...

You are an odd duck, and truly delusional. Do you think anyone is following your goofy stat analysis discussion at this point? I can't imagine anyone is. Go luck at the first post. I just posted the stats. There was no stat analysis, whatever that is.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
mcg said:
CDAGRIZ said:
mcg said:
For what it's worth, I'm in favor of using full year stats. More data is better. We can do this
Click to expand...

You must want to watch the world burn.
Click to expand...

It's a discussion board, right? I'm discussing. :D
Click to expand...

It's much bigger than that. It's a revolution. Get on board against season stat totals, or be left behind. Simple.
Click to expand...

This! Your grandchildren will laugh and be embarrassed of you. In 20 years, season stat totals will be taken as seriously as bloodletting, phrenology and the female orgasm.
 
PlayerRep said:
ordigger said:
PlayerRep said:
ordigger said:
Actually they will....they will see how the candidates performed in the bigger games. You don't believe that Maziel's performance against Alabama last year garnished him many of those votes?

When HOF voters look to vote people, are they looking at how a player did in the minors? Of course not. Ichiro will probably be the first to get credit for his Japanese numbers when voted on for consideration, however his MLB numbers will be enough to get him in. True stats are how you do against your level.

And there is a difference between a "stat" and a "stat analysis".
Click to expand...

No, they won't. You have no clue how Heisman voters vote, or what they analyze.
Click to expand...

Actually I do.....do your really want to go there Mr I Stayed At a Holiday Inn Last Night? Remember last time you thought I didnt know somebody, who looked foolish then? Although I must admit this time its not a relative. Unlike you, I don't name drop, and strut over the fact that I may know this person or that person.
Click to expand...

You are an odd duck, and truly delusional. Do you think anyone is following your goofy stat analysis discussion at this point? I can't imagine anyone is. Go luck at the first post. I just posted the stats. There was no stat analysis, whatever that is.
Click to expand...

True you posted the stats, but then went off the deep end from there. Not arguing the stats are a fact, only stating that a true statistician doing a statistical analysis would apply sampling to this, the best stat will always be the conference stats, no matter who uses them or who cares.

Nice to know you admit you don't know about something. That has to be a first.
 
Ursa Major said:
CDAGRIZ said:
mcg said:
CDAGRIZ said:
You must want to watch the world burn.
Click to expand...

It's a discussion board, right? I'm discussing. :D
Click to expand...

It's much bigger than that. It's a revolution. Get on board against season stat totals, or be left behind. Simple.
Click to expand...

This! Your grandchildren will laugh and be embarrassed of you. In 20 years, season stat totals will be taken as seriously as bloodletting, phrenology and the female orgasm.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the nightmares. That said, one ex-girlfriend was a squirter. Cool, but then super inconvenient.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
Ursa Major said:
CDAGRIZ said:
mcg said:
It's a discussion board, right? I'm discussing. :D
Click to expand...

It's much bigger than that. It's a revolution. Get on board against season stat totals, or be left behind. Simple.
Click to expand...

This! Your grandchildren will laugh and be embarrassed of you. In 20 years, season stat totals will be taken as seriously as bloodletting, phrenology and the female orgasm.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the nightmares. That said, one ex-girlfriend was a squirter. Cool, but then super inconvenient.
Click to expand...

Sorry, you should be having nightmares of Stanford this week.
 
Ursa Major said:
CDAGRIZ said:
Ursa Major said:
CDAGRIZ said:
It's much bigger than that. It's a revolution. Get on board against season stat totals, or be left behind. Simple.
Click to expand...

This! Your grandchildren will laugh and be embarrassed of you. In 20 years, season stat totals will be taken as seriously as bloodletting, phrenology and the female orgasm.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the nightmares. That said, one ex-girlfriend was a squirter. Cool, but then super inconvenient.
Click to expand...

Sorry, you should be having nightmares of Stanford this week.
Click to expand...

Solid recon. BH will have the boys in order. Trees are falling on the farm.
 
CDAGRIZ said:
Ursa Major said:
CDAGRIZ said:
mcg said:
It's a discussion board, right? I'm discussing. :D
Click to expand...

It's much bigger than that. It's a revolution. Get on board against season stat totals, or be left behind. Simple.
Click to expand...

This! Your grandchildren will laugh and be embarrassed of you. In 20 years, season stat totals will be taken as seriously as bloodletting, phrenology and the female orgasm.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the nightmares. That said, one ex-girlfriend was a squirter. Cool, but then super inconvenient.
Click to expand...

:lol: :x :lol:
 
How come the stat critics are not in the CP Scouting Report thread, telling Wahlberg that stats are not meaningful, only conference-only stats might be meaningful, and in order to mention stats you need to perform "stat analysis"? Also, they should be writing letters to the editor to the Missoulian and every media source in the country, all of whom are using full-season stats.
 
Honestly, I could care less about stats.. Just win the games you are scheduled to play..

Now.. NFL fantasy football thats a different story..
 
Lies-Statistics.png
 
I noticed this week in MLB they are using playoff stats as the primary stat. WHY? Why would they use a stat they only represents a few games, when clearly they could be using the regular season stats. Could it be that, there is recognition that those numbers of how they perform in the playoffs is more indicative of how they performed during the season. Another form of sampling, and another version of stat analysis.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top