• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

UM hires lawyer to shepherd it through NCAA investigation

UofMGrizFan

Well-known member
http://billingsgazette.com/sports/c...cle_312c1155-f056-573e-b18c-9280d257be65.html

UM hires lawyer to shepherd it through NCAA investigation

MISSOULA — The University of Montana has hired a $225-an-hour sports lawyer to shepherd it through an NCAA investigation, which will extend beyond the expected six months.

The NCAA notified UM on Monday that its review continues.

"Members of the NCAA enforcement staff are making every effort to complete the necessary interviews to ensure that full information is developed," said the letter from Julie Roe Lach, the NCAA's vice president of enforcement.

The NCAA told UM on Jan. 30 it was investigating the Grizzlies football program - although it said at the time that "new information often is developed during an investigation that leads to expanded inquiries."

The NCAA also said then that it expected to complete its work by spring. That same notification also said that the organization would apprise UM of its progress every six months - which Monday's letter did.

In releasing that information, UM also announced it had hired the sports law firm of Michael L. Buckner of Pompano Beach, Fla.

"They have a level of expertise that has helped us be much more responsive. They know what to expect. They're really looking out for us," said Jean Gee, UM's interim athletic director.

UM signed an engagement letter with Buckner on Monday that sets an hourly rate of $225, with a maximum of $750 per day for office activities and $1,000 per day for field work. Buckner will work with UM until the NCAA's investigation is complete, she said.

UM President Royce Engstrom said Monday that UM will continue to fully cooperate with the NCAA. "Getting outside help will allow us to do that more effectively," he said of the decision to hire Buckner.

Gee said the NCAA gave no hint as to how long its investigation might take. The football team starts practice Monday, and its first game is Sept. 1 against South Dakota.

"It's certainly on everyone's mind," said Gee of the investigation. "I just don't know what kind of impact it will have on the program."

But it leaves everyone wondering, "What is this, what could happen?" she said.

"It would be nice to have it over with before then, but I don't see that that is going to happen," Engstrom said. "We have to move forward with the season and wish the Grizzlies the best."

Those questions gained urgency earlier this month after the NCAA severely sanctioned Penn State in connection with that school's failure to deal with former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky's abuse of young boys. The NCAA hit Penn State with a $60 million fine and a four-year ban on postseason games. And it scrubbed all of the school's victories back to 1998.

David Ridpath, an assistant professor of sports management at Ohio University, at the time noted parallels between the situations at Penn State and UM. Given the NCAA action against Penn State, "I cannot see how they could justify not punishing (UM) for the criminal issues," he said.

At UM, the NCAA investigation came on the heels of allegations of rape and sexual assault, both on and off campus, some allegedly by members of the football team. (The university also commissioned its own investigation of the allegations.)

In March, Engstrom fired both athletic director Jim O'Day and head football coach Robin Pflugrad. He has given no reason for those firings. Last week, interim coach Mick Delaney was named UM's head football coach and given a two-year contract.

At the announcement, Delaney said he will work to restore the school's reputation - beginning by recruiting the right kind of players.

"I can guarantee you we will recruit kids of high character No. 1, good academics No. 2 ... and No. 3, they have to be able to play a little bit, too," he said. "We do not have the time or the resources to chase guys around who will not do the right thing."

Buckner, the attorney UM has hired, is a former consultant to the NCAA, according to his website.

Gee said the firm specializes in smaller schools, something that made it attractive to UM.

Buckner writes a blog, where earlier this month he termed the then-anticipated NCAA sanctions against Penn State "an unprecedented, and perhaps unconstitutional, course of action."

After the sanctions were formally announced, he wrote that such issues "would be best left in the expert hands of the criminal and civil courts, the federal Departments of Justice and Education, the Pennsylvania General Assembly and the relevant accrediting agencies."

Investigations by the Justice and Education departments already are under way at UM. The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division is investigating how the UM police, the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Attorney's Office handle reports of rape and sexual assault. The Education Department is investigating allegations of harassment by members of the football team.
 
I really don't know why this is front page news of the Missoulian; it make sense to hire someone who has experience in this area and I'm surprised they didn't hire someone earlier. IMO it was a bigger news story that UM waited until after the JJ hearing to hire Randy Cox to guide them through that debacle.
 
UofMGrizFan said:
http://billingsgazette.com/sports/c...cle_312c1155-f056-573e-b18c-9280d257be65.html

UM hires lawyer to shepherd it through NCAA investigation

David Ridpath, an assistant professor of sports management at Ohio University, at the time noted parallels between the situations at Penn State and UM. Given the NCAA action against Penn State, "I cannot see how they could justify not punishing (UM) for the criminal issues," he said.

This would have been a great point in the article for Fwen Glorio to list the criminal charges leveled against Montana athletes. Oh yeah, that's right. There are none other than Stuberg's, which is the charge Glorio almost never raises.

This entire Missoulian diatribe is built on the assumption that someone will be charged with something eventually. And yet the days fly by..
 
as you can see it takes very little for the n.c.a.a. to determine there's been a coverup.

Emails exchanged by the administrators in February 2001 and now released to CNN disclose some disturbing information. Schultz, the VP, proposed to do three things after he and Curley met with McQueary: talk to Sandusky, notify The Second Mile, and contact the Pennsylvania Department of Welfare, which had undertaken the 1998 investigation. The administrators were legally obliged to do the latter.

But then Curley had some reservations. "After giving it more thought and talking it over with Joe yesterday, I am uncomfortable with what we agreed were the next steps," he wrote to Schultz and Spanier. He recommended instead that they simply talk to Sandusky (always referred to as "the individual") and help him "get professional help." Only if the former defensive coordinator were "uncooperative" would they inform The Second Mile and outside authorities.

The President agreed. "The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed," he replied. For Schultz, too, this was " a more humane and upfront way to handle" the case, though he recommended telling the charity, whether or not Sandusky agreed.

It's hard to avoid the impression that it was Paterno's advice that helped steer Penn State down a very slippery slope.

the charges in both cases are similarly disgusting and should the n.c.a.a. find something like what you just read above, then brace yourself.
 
The crappy thing about the NCAA is that they don't really have to follow any guidelines. Each case is different and doesn't have a lot to do with another one. They really do have no consistency, so looking at prior cases typically does not help very much. It's frustrating.
 
PTGrizzly said:
The crappy thing about the NCAA is that they don't really have to follow any guidelines. Each case is different and doesn't have a lot to do with another one. They really do have no consistency, so looking at prior cases typically does not help very much. It's frustrating.

Agreed. They punish people and fans who have absolutely nothing to do with any of the alleged infractions. Penn State should pay through the ying yang for their inaction, but the athletes and the entire athletic program will suffer because Der Fuhrer Emmert dropped the hammer of vengence.

On another note, I am actually surprised that UM didn't hire self-proclaimed NCAA and legal expert PlayerRep.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top