grizcountry420 said:No need to cherry pick a bunch of stats. Here is where out defense ranked among the rest of the FCS. Its pretty average if you ask me, especially with all of the talent he had to work with. Not even in the top 30 for christ sakes with Gregorak in charge. Breske did a nice job while he was here and Paulsen didn't do much better than Gregorak and PR wants to say we were better than average? Maybe in our conference we were decent but on a national level our defense was average at best with a few good years in between.
Total Defense under Gregorak
57th 2015-2016
39th 2014-2015
56th 2013-2014
66th 2012-2013
Average: 54.5
Total Defense under Breske
26th 2011-2012
10th 2010-2011
Average: 18
Total Defense under Paulsen
69th 2009-2010
45th 2008-2009
32nd 2007-2008
9th 2006-2007
41st 2005-2006
102nd 2004-2005
Average: 49.6
Source:
http://stats.ncaa.org/rankings/change_sport_year_div
http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp
It isn't cherry picking to compare against playoff teams. It is not relevant that the stats of weak teams from weak conferences are "better" than UM's. Maybe you think the stats of teams like the following show that they are better defensive teams, but I don't.
NC A&T, various Ivies, Campell, SC St, Alcorn, Gardner-Webb, Kennesaw St, Hampton, St Francis (are you telling us that St Francis has a better defense than the Griz), San Diego, Robert Morris, Jacksonville, Drake, Eastern Kentucky, Bucknell, Morgan St., Bethune-Cookman, SE La., Sacred Heart, Butler, NC Central, Citadel, Marist, Monmouth, Dayton, Bryant, Alabama St, Tenn. St., Stetson, Presbyterian, Norfolk St, Holy Cross.
Bloomberg and Hook, why don't you point out a half dozen of these teams that you believe had a better defense than UM, and then maybe we can focus on them.