• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Transfers and net loss/gain

Wolf777

Well-known member
Maybe I should throw this in the Toure thread, but I think there was a fair amount of discussion about the negative impacts of the transfer portal, and the detrimental effects it will have on FCS football which seems to be in for a drastic overhaul anyways(like all of college football).

One of the big concerns were programs finding the diamonds in the rough and having them poached away, or having athletes not be loyal to their commitment for their entire career (which is happening at every level and even brand name programs). Given the number of athletes in football and basketball in the transfer portal that aren't finding homes, coupled with the shortage of scholarships due to COVID, it seems at least for today that losing one stud like Toure while gaining several transfers at key positions (i.e. DE, CB, OL) will still continue to be more advantageous for those programs below that are picking up guys that can't make the 2 or 3 deep at the upper level, versus the true standout phenom on a lower level team.
 
I know they all got an extra year of eligibility (which just screws up incoming classes for the next four years), but if I had a scholarship at a school, I’d be locking that bitch down. There are way more players in the portal than there are slots available...in all sports. Fully 1/3 of all NCAA basketball rosters have entered the portal. It’s gotten crazy, and lots of those kids are gonna be left without a home when the music stops.
 
Assuming full health, the majority of our starters on both sides of the ball are transfers.
4 out of 5 starters on O-line (assuming Pillans), plus QB and RB (assuming Knight) makes 6.
Seems like even more on D: two safeties, both corners, both D-ends, and a LB.
 
garizzalies said:
Assuming full health, the majority of our starters on both sides of the ball are transfers.
4 out of 5 starters on O-line (assuming Pillans), plus QB and RB (assuming Knight) makes 6.
Seems like even more on D: two safeties, both corners, both D-ends, and a LB.

Interesting. Thx.
 
PlayerRep said:
garizzalies said:
Assuming full health, the majority of our starters on both sides of the ball are transfers.
4 out of 5 starters on O-line (assuming Pillans), plus QB and RB (assuming Knight) makes 6.
Seems like even more on D: two safeties, both corners, both D-ends, and a LB.

Interesting. Thx.

The cupboards were left bare...except for WR’s.
 
Back
Top