• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

MBBALL Tonight's Big Sky games

Griz til I die

Well-known member
DONOR
The Griz are off tonight preparing for the Brawl on Saturday, but we still got 4 games tonight:

Idaho vs. UNC
Eastern vs. NAU
SAC vs. Idaho State
PSU vs. Weber State

The marquee game of the night is down in Moscow between Idaho and UNC. I know we swept the season series with Idaho, but I think they present some matchup problems for UNC. Mitchell and Mims especially I think could be tough for UNC to handle. If Idaho is dialed in from 3 tonight, then this will be a heck of a game. UNC has played (and won) a lot of really close games so far. Tonight feels like their best opportunity for a loss in some time.
 
The Griz are off tonight preparing for the Brawl on Saturday, but we still got 4 games tonight:

Idaho vs. UNC
Eastern vs. NAU
SAC vs. Idaho State
PSU vs. Weber State

The marquee game of the night is down in Moscow between Idaho and UNC. I know we swept the season series with Idaho, but I think they present some matchup problems for UNC. Mitchell and Mims especially I think could be tough for UNC to handle. If Idaho is dialed in from 3 tonight, then this will be a heck of a game. UNC has played (and won) a lot of really close games so far. Tonight feels like their best opportunity for a loss in some time.
Good call in your later comments -- which don't show in my quote. Close (77-75 UI), and the Spuds were behind most of the way. Kudos for pulling it out at the very end.
 
The Griz are off tonight preparing for the Brawl on Saturday, but we still got 4 games tonight:

Idaho vs. UNC
Eastern vs. NAU
SAC vs. Idaho State
PSU vs. Weber State

The marquee game of the night is down in Moscow between Idaho and UNC. I know we swept the season series with Idaho, but I think they present some matchup problems for UNC. Mitchell and Mims especially I think could be tough for UNC to handle. If Idaho is dialed in from 3 tonight, then this will be a heck of a game. UNC has played (and won) a lot of really close games so far. Tonight feels like their best opportunity for a loss in some time.
Idaho came back from being 10 down to as much as down 13 to beat NC by 3 points on a last second 3 pointer by a freshman. He scored 25 for the game including 24 in the second half. Sorry forgot his name. He only scored 5 against us Monday night. NC still looks very good.
 
Well great night for the Griz! Idaho beat UNC on a buzzer beater to bring us back within a game of the Bears, and Sac State who was down 3 starters last night, was able to hang on to beat Idaho State which puts us in sole possession of second place. Portland State is a half game behind us but tomorrow they host Idaho State. That game is tomorrow at 3 and an ISU win plus a Griz win would mean we would have a full game lead on everyone for second place
 
Thought this was as good a place as any to plug this, rather than starting a new topic.

Several threads have comments that the Griz are too prone to long scoring droughts, and that complaint does have some merit. In both conference losses, the Griz had at least one long drought … over 7 mins. against Idaho State and about 4 mins. against Northern Colorado.

But are the Griz “prone” to such long droughts? That partly depends upon your definition of ”long.” In their six wins, the Griz suffered no drought over 4 mins., and only one over 3 mins. (3:19). The rest saw 2 mins. or less. Ironically, the over 3 min drought was more than balanced by a 3:59 min drought by Idaho.

A common comment notes that such droughts are a part of basketball. Naturally, I wondered if the data supported that assertion. Since there were a ton of games yesterday, I decided to do a survey. I applied one main criteria: the game had to end relatively close, say less than 10 points difference. Even within that restriction, I didn’t look at every result, but I think I got a good sampling. The results are instructive.

In the games I examined, over half showed droughts of at least 3 mins. In fact, about a third of the sample had droughts of over 4 mins. Moreover, the teams with the longest drought was not always the loser. Duke, for example, scored only a single point for almost 7 mins coming out of halftime, but won by 7 points anyway. Of course, many droughts did result in a loss. Example: North Carolina State fell behind by scoring just one point during almost 7 mins. leading into halftime. They made it closer toward the end, but still lost at home, 57-63 (to SMU). The Rhode Island at La Salle game must have been painful: early in the second half, both suffered droughts at more or less the same time – over 4 mins. (La Salle) and over 5 mins (RI). Between them, they scored just one point over that 4-5 min span. Ouch!

I also looked at all the Big Sky games from yesterday. There were no long droughts for either team in the NAU at Idaho game. Not quite a drought in the Weber State game because the Wildcats did keep scoring. But they had a 21 point lead with 7:40 left in the game. Then Sac State got hot and whittled that down to just 6 points at the end.

Portland State gave Idaho State some early hope by having a 5:33 drought midway through the first half. They began to pull away in the second half, then the Bengals sealed their fate with a 3 min drought midway through the second half.

EWU hung with Northern Colorado, leading at several points. However, a 6-point lead went away with a 3:21 drought with about 9 mins. left in the game. It was close after that, but the Bears won with a spurt in the last minute. Very much a woulda, coulda, shoulda.

The Griz built a pretty good lead over the kitties, with no long dry spells. Still, MSU was slowly closing the gap until they hit a 2 min drought with around 3 mins. left in the game. They gained ground after that and made the end nerve wracking, to say the least.

Conclusion from all this: Spurts and dry spells are the norm in basketball, and the Griz are in no way unusual (good or bad) in this regard.
 
Good breakdown. We think about those things after close games and particularly when we lose those games. BB is a game of streaks and runs. Those things happen on both sides of the ball. Good teams find ways to pull out the wins in those close games, close them out. Having one or two players who can get to good shots, on their own or with the help of their team mates, Is very important. Being lucky here and there is also a big help.
 
Good breakdown. We think about those things after close games and particularly when we lose those games. BB is a game of streaks and runs. Those things happen on both sides of the ball. Good teams find ways to pull out the wins in those close games, close them out. Having one or two players who can get to good shots, on their own or with the help of their team mates, Is very important. Being lucky here and there is also a big help.
When I started my survey, I had the vague notion that the top-level teams, with more 4- and 5-star players, would not have as many droughts. I kinda figured they should have more "candidates" who could step up to stop a lull. That turned out to be wrong. Ranked teams were "well represented" among those that fell into 4- or 5-min. shooting slumps.
 
EWU hung with Northern Colorado, leading at several points. However, a 6-point lead went away with a 3:21 drought with about 9 mins. left in the game. It was close after that, but the Bears won with a spurt in the last minute. Very much a woulda, coulda, shoulda.
Sigh, this feels like the story of the year for EWU. I'm not basketball guru, but I attribute it to a lack of depth, seeing that the coach had to rebuild our roster in the period of a few weeks since EWU's previous team is playing for WSU.

Still going with the glass half full mentality for next year though.
 
Back
Top