• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Tinkle $$ Selvig

citygriz said:
should huse's be more than binford?

I wondered the same thing.

Coaches are generally measured on three things. The successfulness of the program (wins/losses/championship), longevity at the program and money the program brings in.

So far record very similar, but Binford has one more year in the program. The men's programs does pull in more fans to games and fund-raises a little better, so on the money side the men's programs is doing a little better. On merit I would think they should be very close, on money pulled in the side Men's does have an advantage.

A fourth item that sometimes effects a coaches salary is, does a program take their coach for granted or will someone else offer him/her more.
 
can't ignore the marketplace. and the market for men's salaries is going into the stratosphere. calapari got $31 million over eight years, and oregon reportedly offered tom izzo even more. if the griz get these recruits, and do as well over the next year or two as i believe they can, tinkle will be a hot property, you can bet on that.

marketplace rules.
 
The head coach doesn't control attendance. He puts an exciting product on the floor, people show up. Tinkle did his part of the deal. The fans didn't.

And there are much bigger "big picture" things to consider than beating the Bobcats. This is D-1 basketball. There are only 2-3 Montanans in the game, anyway.

I think city is right. In the next 5 years we might find out exactly how deep TInkle's UM/Missoula roots run.
 
IronMountainGriz&Cat said:
Absolutely not. What are about the other apparently minor areas: beating the cats, attendance, consistency, and winning the Big Sky regular season.
You have got to be kidding. So if we took up badminton and always beat the cats... I don't care if Selvig beats them 1000 times it's still women's basketball. I hope you don't think I'm putting women down but they are not in the same league as men's BB.
 
General Disarray said:
The head coach doesn't control attendance. He puts an exciting product on the floor, people show up. Tinkle did his part of the deal. The fans didn't.

Except for the eve of Feb 27. The fans showed up, Tinkle didn't.
 
Hammer said:
General Disarray said:
The head coach doesn't control attendance. He puts an exciting product on the floor, people show up. Tinkle did his part of the deal. The fans didn't.

Except for the eve of Feb 27. The fans showed up, Tinkle didn't.

Yes, true. One time out of 17 it went the other way.
 
General Disarray said:
Yes, true. One time out of 17 it went the other way.

A win that night would have been huge for Griz BBall. It was a missed opportunity to start getting the fans back.

But, with the BSC championship game and great showing in the NCAA I think the fans will start coming back and if the future is as bright as some claim and the Griz start winning consistently then they will come back. Exciting product can only do so much, ya gotta win.
 
Hammer said:
General Disarray said:
Yes, true. One time out of 17 it went the other way.

A win that night would have been huge for Griz BBall. It was a missed opportunity to start getting the fans back.

But, with the BSC championship game and great showing in the NCAA I think the fans will start coming back and if the future is as bright as some claim and the Griz start winning consistently then they will come back. Exciting product can only do so much, ya gotta win.

Yeah it was a huge missed chance to boost fan interest since Griz games are rarely televised locally and going by the numbers, about 4,000 of the fans that night very rarely attend games. To the very casual fan that might only pay attention during the "big" games, they may have seen the Griz go 0-3 last year, or 1-4 if they caught the Big Sky champ game, but it was actually a really exciting season, IMO.
 
Back
Top