Growler1 said:Tokyogriz said:The Kaiman article is one gals view on a drunken episode from her own admission. If both people are intoxicated and considering the nature of her own admission getting into bed in her panties with a guy while both were drunk the TRUTH may not exactly be what she claims. The thing is people often "Remember" or "Interpret" events that happened when they were drunk very differently than another person at the same event.
It would take very little for her version of events to not be the rape she claims. I am not saying it was not, I was not there. But this "Case" if she chose to pursue it would be mighty tough to actually prove. How read everything she wrote and conclude she was raped with 100% certainty? It would be impossible really unless you just assume everything a woman says about a man is true no matter what evidence or lack thereoff.
What we have now at UM is the Guilty until proven innocent for all athletes. If the guy in the Kaiman case was an athlete he could never actually prove his innocence even if it was true. Therefore he gets punished on a womans say so without due process. This is as much a travesty on our American life as the crime of rape is.
Please keep your ongoing agenda out of this thread. You have ruined yet another thread with your obsession.
But still hasnt caused egriz to close it's doors completely, like you did to Gordon Terpe and the UGMB! Shot anyone lately, chump?